Boulders are globally widespread and influence processes across many landscapes including hillslopes, coasts, rivers and extra-terrestrial settings. Boulders are described as particles, sufficiently large, that they have a disproportionate effect on the surrounding landscape. Moving beyond this conceptual definition, however, requires a somewhat arbitrary decision of how to define a minimum boulder size. The implications of boulder definition on study findings are rarely considered. We investigate the suitability of five boulder definitions, two based on fixed sizes: (1) 0.26 m and (2) 1 m, and three definitions which vary based on system characteristics: (3) grain mobility, (4) grain protrusion and (5) surface grain size distribution (> 84th percentile, D84). We consider the impact of definition on calculated boulder metrics, and, for the >1m and >D84 definitions, their association with channel and catchment characteristics across 20 boulder-bed streams in northern Sweden. We also surveyed river managers responsible for restoring these rivers, to gain a practitioner insight on boulder size definition. We found that boulder definition matters; for metrics relating to the number or density of boulders, the >D84 and >1m size definitions were negatively correlated. Surveys indicated the importance of communicating boulder definition. We conclude that, whilst the best choice of boulder size definition will vary based on the questions of interest and techniques employed, evaluating the implications of the chosen boulder size definition and communicating the reasoning behind boulder definition choice is crucial.