Umeå universitets logga

umu.sePublikationer
Ändra sökning
RefereraExporteraLänk till posten
Permanent länk

Direktlänk
Referera
Referensformat
  • apa
  • ieee
  • vancouver
  • Annat format
Fler format
Språk
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Annat språk
Fler språk
Utmatningsformat
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Navigating process evaluation in co-creation: A Health CASCADE scoping review of used frameworks and assessed components
Faculty of Psychology, Education and Sport Sciences, Universitat Ramon Llull, Barcelona, Spain.
Department of Movement and Sports Sciences, Ghent University, Gent, Belgium; Department of Public Health and Primary Care, Ghent University, Gent, Belgium.
Department of Public and Occupational Health, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Amsterdam, Netherlands.
School of Health and Life Sciences, Glasgow Caledonian University, Glasgow, United Kingdom.
Visa övriga samt affilieringar
2024 (Engelska)Ingår i: BMJ Global Health, E-ISSN 2059-7908, Vol. 9, nr 7, artikel-id e014483Artikel i tidskrift (Refereegranskat) Published
Abstract [en]

Background: Co-creation is seen as a way to ensure all relevant needs and perspectives are included and to increase its potential for beneficial effects and uptake process evaluation is crucial. However, existing process evaluation frameworks have been built on practices characterised by top-down developed and implemented interventions and may be limited in capturing essential elements of co-creation. This study aims to provide a review of studies planning and/or conducting a process evaluation of public health interventions adopting a co-creation approach and aims to derive assessed process evaluation components, used frameworks and insights into formative and/or participatory evaluation.

Methods: We searched for studies on Scopus and the Health CASCADE Co-Creation Database. Co-authors performed a concept-mapping exercise to create a set of overarching dimensions for clustering the identified process evaluation components.

Results: 54 studies were included. Conceptualisation of process evaluation included in studies concerned intervention implementation, outcome evaluation, mechanisms of impact, context and the co-creation process. 22 studies (40%) referenced ten existing process evaluation or evaluation frameworks and most referenced were the frameworks developed by Moore et al (14%), Saunders et al (5%), Steckler and Linnan (5%) and Nielsen and Randall (5%).

38 process evaluation components were identified, with a focus on participation (48%), context (40%), the experience of co-creators (29%), impact (29%), satisfaction (25%) and fidelity (24%).

13 studies (24%) conducted formative evaluation, 37 (68%) conducted summative evaluation and 2 studies (3%) conducted participatory evaluation.

Conclusion: The broad spectrum of process evaluation components addressed in co-creation studies, covering both the evaluation of the co-creation process and the intervention implementation, highlights the need for a process evaluation tailored to co-creation studies. This work provides an overview of process evaluation components, clustered in dimensions and reflections which researchers and practitioners can use to plan a process evaluation of a co-creation process and intervention.

Ort, förlag, år, upplaga, sidor
BMJ Publishing Group Ltd, 2024. Vol. 9, nr 7, artikel-id e014483
Nyckelord [en]
Health systems evaluation, Public Health, Review
Nationell ämneskategori
Hälso- och sjukvårdsorganisation, hälsopolitik och hälsoekonomi
Identifikatorer
URN: urn:nbn:se:umu:diva-227878DOI: 10.1136/bmjgh-2023-014483ISI: 001265209800001Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-85197806182OAI: oai:DiVA.org:umu-227878DiVA, id: diva2:1884193
Forskningsfinansiär
EU, Horisont 2020, 956501Tillgänglig från: 2024-07-15 Skapad: 2024-07-15 Senast uppdaterad: 2025-04-24Bibliografiskt granskad

Open Access i DiVA

fulltext(745 kB)107 nedladdningar
Filinformation
Filnamn FULLTEXT01.pdfFilstorlek 745 kBChecksumma SHA-512
3dcd99d3f93c09c44311e62f12c4653d80b4335cffdb9877942d1a6b51f7bcac288de4d245064656ed5df30c2f56eb9bb601cf1763159a80d5456ee4f652f05b
Typ fulltextMimetyp application/pdf

Övriga länkar

Förlagets fulltextScopus

Person

An, Qingfan

Sök vidare i DiVA

Av författaren/redaktören
An, Qingfan
Av organisationen
Institutionen för samhällsmedicin och rehabilitering
I samma tidskrift
BMJ Global Health
Hälso- och sjukvårdsorganisation, hälsopolitik och hälsoekonomi

Sök vidare utanför DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
Totalt: 108 nedladdningar
Antalet nedladdningar är summan av nedladdningar för alla fulltexter. Det kan inkludera t.ex tidigare versioner som nu inte längre är tillgängliga.

doi
urn-nbn

Altmetricpoäng

doi
urn-nbn
Totalt: 364 träffar
RefereraExporteraLänk till posten
Permanent länk

Direktlänk
Referera
Referensformat
  • apa
  • ieee
  • vancouver
  • Annat format
Fler format
Språk
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Annat språk
Fler språk
Utmatningsformat
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf