Umeå University's logo

umu.sePublications
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Vietnamese health professionals’ views on the status of the fetus and maternal and fetal health interests: a regional, cross-sectional study from the Hanoi area
Umeå University, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Clinical Sciences, Obstetrics and Gynecology.ORCID iD: 0000-0003-2985-1135
Department of Dermatology and Venereology, Hanoi Medical University, Hanoi, Viet Nam.
Institute of Mathematics, Vietnam Academy of Science and Technology, Hanoi, Viet Nam.
Umeå University, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Nursing. Umeå University, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Clinical Sciences, Obstetrics and Gynecology. Judith Lumley Centre, School of Nursing and Midwifery, La Trobe University, Melbourne, Australia.ORCID iD: 0000-0003-3391-2308
Show others and affiliations
2024 (English)In: PLOS ONE, E-ISSN 1932-6203, Vol. 19, no 9, article id e0310029Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Obstetric ultrasound is an important tool in managing pregnancies and its use is increasing globally. However, the status of the pregnant woman and the fetus may vary in terms of clinical management, views in the community and legislation. To investigate the views and experiences of Vietnamese health professionals on maternal and fetal health interests, priority setting and potential conflicts, we conducted a cross-sectional study using a structured questionnaire. Obstetricians/gynecologists, midwives and sonographers who manage pregnant women in maternity wards were invited to participate. We purposively chose public health facilities in the Hanoi region of Vietnam to obtain a representative sample. The final sample included 882 health professionals, of which 32.7% (n = 289) were obstetricians/ gynecologists, 60.7% (n = 535) midwives and 6.6% (n = 58) sonographers. The majority of participants (60.3%) agreed that “The fetus is a person from the time of conception” and that maternal health interests should always be prioritised over fetal health interests in care provided (54.4%). 19.7% agreed that the fetus is never a patient, only the pregnant woman can be the patient, while 60.5% disagreed. Participants who performed ultrasounds were more likely to agree that fetal health interests are being given more weight in decision-making the further the gestation advances compared to those who did not perform ultrasounds (cOR 2.47, CI 1.27–4.79: n = 811). A significant proportion of health professionals in Vietnam assign the fetus the status of being a person, where personhood gradually evolves during pregnancy. While the fetus is often considered a patient with its own health interests, a majority of participants did give priority to maternal health interests. Health professionals appear to favour increased legal protection of the fetus. Strengthening the legal status of the fetus might have adverse implications for maternal autonomy. Measures to restrict maternal autonomy might require close observation to ensure that maternal reproductive rights are protected.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Public Library of Science (PLoS), 2024. Vol. 19, no 9, article id e0310029
National Category
Gynaecology, Obstetrics and Reproductive Medicine
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:umu:diva-229924DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0310029ISI: 001310339200001PubMedID: 39259744Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-85203624300OAI: oai:DiVA.org:umu-229924DiVA, id: diva2:1900382
Funder
Umeå UniversityRegion VästerbottenSwedish Research Council, 2014-2672Forte, Swedish Research Council for Health, Working Life and WelfareAvailable from: 2024-09-23 Created: 2024-09-23 Last updated: 2025-04-24Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

fulltext(892 kB)78 downloads
File information
File name FULLTEXT01.pdfFile size 892 kBChecksum SHA-512
a619a0f8a935df1e7fbd00af09647aae039be8d5fa35b1d11b3c3d13918e3539cc96e4f0fb1207f6718a11463d6afeef91803fbc8edd89e39f888ff987cd9dd9
Type fulltextMimetype application/pdf

Other links

Publisher's full textPubMedScopus

Authority records

Mogren, IngridHolmlund, SophiaSemasaka Sengoma, Jean PaulBergström, Cecilia

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Mogren, IngridHolmlund, SophiaSemasaka Sengoma, Jean PaulBergström, Cecilia
By organisation
Obstetrics and GynecologyDepartment of Nursing
In the same journal
PLOS ONE
Gynaecology, Obstetrics and Reproductive Medicine

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
Total: 79 downloads
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn
Total: 237 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf