Umeå University's logo

umu.sePublications
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Health professionals' experiences and views on obstetric ultrasound in Victoria, Australia: a cross-sectional survey
Pregnancy Research Centre, Department of Maternal-Fetal Medicine, Royal Women's Hospital, VIC, Melbourne, Australia.
Umeå University, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Clinical Sciences, Obstetrics and Gynecology.ORCID iD: 0000-0003-2985-1135
Umeå University, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Clinical Sciences, Obstetrics and Gynecology.ORCID iD: 0000-0003-0566-0457
Northern Hospital, VIC, Melbourne, Australia; Judith Lumley Centre, School of Nursing & Midwifery, La Trobe University, VIC, Melbourne, Australia.
Show others and affiliations
2025 (English)In: Australian and New Zealand journal of obstetrics and gynaecology, ISSN 0004-8666, E-ISSN 1479-828X, Vol. 65, no 2, p. 190-197Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Background: Obstetric ultrasound is an important tool, aiding in screening, diagnosis, and surveillance throughout pregnancy.

Aims: To explore obstetric doctors', midwives', and sonographers' experiences and views of obstetric ultrasound in Victoria, Australia. To investigate the increasing role of obstetric ultrasound for clinical management, and the adequacy of resources and training for appropriate use of ultrasound in clinical management.

Materials and Methods: This cross-sectional study forms part of a multi-national CROss-Country Ultrasound Study (CROCUS) exploring the views of consumers and health professionals from high-, middle- and low-income countries. Qualitative studies conducted in several countries informed the construction of a quantitative survey. These quantitative surveys were distributed to 16 hospitals across regional and metropolitan Victoria, Australia. Descriptive statistics were analysed from the responses.

Results: There were 354 questionnaires returned from 106 doctors, 222 midwives, and 26 sonographers. Overall, 72% of respondents held concerns about the potential loss of focus on clinical skills with increasing ultrasound use. Midwives were more concerned about the contribution of ultrasound to medicalisation of pregnancy than were doctors (P < 0.001). Many respondents noted that geographical factors (71%), rather than income levels (53%) influenced access to obstetric ultrasound. Over 90% of doctors and midwives believed additional training for their respective professions in ultrasound would enhance its reach and effectiveness.

Conclusions: Our survey findings confirm that clinicians place high levels of trust in the diagnostic findings of obstetric ultrasound antenatal care in Australia. Access to routine ultrasound could be improved for women in rural and lower-income areas.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
John Wiley & Sons, 2025. Vol. 65, no 2, p. 190-197
Keywords [en]
Australia, cross-sectional studies, midwifery, obstetrics, ultrasonography
National Category
Gynaecology, Obstetrics and Reproductive Medicine
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:umu:diva-230160DOI: 10.1111/ajo.13879ISI: 001317209700001PubMedID: 39304317Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-85204633128OAI: oai:DiVA.org:umu-230160DiVA, id: diva2:1901991
Available from: 2024-09-30 Created: 2024-09-30 Last updated: 2025-07-11Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Other links

Publisher's full textPubMedScopus

Authority records

Mogren, IngridBergström, CeciliaHolmlund, Sophia

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Mogren, IngridBergström, CeciliaHolmlund, Sophia
By organisation
Obstetrics and Gynecology
In the same journal
Australian and New Zealand journal of obstetrics and gynaecology
Gynaecology, Obstetrics and Reproductive Medicine

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn
Total: 132 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf