Umeå University's logo

umu.sePublications
System disruptions
There are recurring service disruptions on some of the search portals due to high traffic. We are working to resolve the issue, you may temporarily encounter an error message.
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Carbon emission from the Lower Ob River floodplain during spring flood
BIO-GEO-CLIM Laboratory, Tomsk State University, Tomsk, Russian Federation.
BIO-GEO-CLIM Laboratory, Tomsk State University, Tomsk, Russian Federation.
Umeå University, Faculty of Science and Technology, Department of Ecology and Environmental Sciences.ORCID iD: 0000-0001-5730-0694
Geosciences and Environment Toulouse, UMR 5563 CNRS, 14 Avenue Edouard Belin, Toulouse, France.
2024 (English)In: Science of the Total Environment, ISSN 0048-9697, E-ISSN 1879-1026, Vol. 954, article id 176294Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Carbon emission from Arctic rivers constitutes a positive feedback between the climate warming and C cycle. However, in case of rivers with extensive floodplains, the impacts of temporary water bodies and secondary channels on CO2 exchange with atmosphere, compared to the main stem and tributaries, remain strongly understudied. In order to quantify the relative role of various water bodies of the Arctic river basin in the C cycle, the hydrochemical variables and greenhouse gases GHG concentrations and fluxes were measured within the floodplain of the largest Arctic River, Ob, in its low reaches located in the permafrost zone. These included the main stem, secondary channels, tributaries and floodplain lakes sampled over a 900 km north-south transect (25,736 km2 of the main stem and adjacent floodplain area; 7893 km2 water surface) during peak of spring flood (May 2023). In addition to main stem and tributaries, providing less than a half of overall C flux, floodplain lakes and secondary channels acted as important factor of C emission from the floodplain water surfaces. Multi-parametric statistical treatment of the data suggested two main processes of C emission from the Ob River floodplain waters: terrestrial organic matter-rich flooded wetlands (fens) provided elevated pCO2, whereas the sites of possible groundwater discharge in the secondary channels decreased the CO2 fluxes due to more alkaline environments, rich in labile metals and anionic elements. Based on available high-resolution Landsat-8 images, which matched the period of field work, it was found that the total water coverage of the floodplain during spring 2023 was 30 % of overall territory, compared to 18 % during the baseflow. Based on chamber-measured CO2 fluxes (1.56 ± 0.47 g C-CO2 m−2 d−1), overall CO2 emissions during 2 months of the spring flood from the entire Lower Ob River floodplain water surfaces including the main stem amounted to 0.73 ± 0.25 Tg C. Diffuse CH4 flux represented <1 % of total C flux. The main stem of the Ob River accounted for 34 % and 18 % of CO2 and CH4 emissions, respectively, whereas the floodplain lakes provided 59 % and 50 % of CO2 and CH4 emission, respectively. Considering that the low reaches of the Ob River represent >70 % of total river basin floodplain, and that during some years, the entire floodplain can be covered by water, emissions from the river – if assessed solely from summer (July–August) measurements – can be at least 3 times underestimated. It is therefore important to account for extended water surface during high water levels on Arctic rivers when assessing global riverine C emissions.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Elsevier, 2024. Vol. 954, article id 176294
Keywords [en]
Arctic, CO2, Emission, Permafrost, River, Siberia
National Category
Physical Geography Oceanography, Hydrology and Water Resources
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:umu:diva-230020DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2024.176294ISI: 001320330900001PubMedID: 39284442Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-85204348169OAI: oai:DiVA.org:umu-230020DiVA, id: diva2:1903250
Available from: 2024-10-03 Created: 2024-10-03 Last updated: 2024-10-03Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

fulltext(5784 kB)167 downloads
File information
File name FULLTEXT01.pdfFile size 5784 kBChecksum SHA-512
82652fffe81df83ca18d21fbbfe45b5f19e51dc19e447f200e6fb61c789b3219e66f0aee3536a79072307fdbf77c9ae7d5bf01d0b6ab40ca4cfa648bf4bd574b
Type fulltextMimetype application/pdf

Other links

Publisher's full textPubMedScopus

Authority records

Karlsson, Jan

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Karlsson, Jan
By organisation
Department of Ecology and Environmental Sciences
In the same journal
Science of the Total Environment
Physical GeographyOceanography, Hydrology and Water Resources

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
Total: 169 downloads
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn
Total: 363 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf