Umeå University's logo

umu.sePublications
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Patient and public involvement in healthcare: a systematic mapping review of systematic reviews - identification of current research and possible directions for future research
Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg Centre for Person-Centred Care, Gothenburg, Sweden; Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg Institute of Health and Care Sciences, Gothenburg, Sweden.
Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg Centre for Person-Centred Care, Gothenburg, Sweden; Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg Institute of Health and Care Sciences, Gothenburg, Sweden.
Umeå University, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Medical and Translational Biology.
University of Gothenburg Department of Sociology and Work Science, Gothenburg, Sweden.
Show others and affiliations
2024 (English)In: BMJ Open, E-ISSN 2044-6055, Vol. 14, no 9, article id e083215Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

OBJECTIVES: To provide an overview of patient and public involvement (PPI) in the mesolevel and macrolevel of healthcare (different from PPI in research) and identify directions for future research by mapping contexts, terminology, conceptual frameworks, measured outcomes and research gaps.

DESIGN: Mapping review of systematic reviews. A patient coresearcher (JB) was involved in all stages. A broad search strategy was applied to capture the variation in terminology.

DATA SOURCES: MEDLINE, CINAHL and PsycINFO were searched from 1 January 2001 to 5 December 2022.

ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA: We included systematic reviews of empirical studies focusing on PPI in the mesolevel and macrolevel of healthcare.

DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS: Three independent reviewers used standardised methods to screen studies and extract data. Thematic categories were created inductively through iteration. The results were organised in narrative, visual or tabular formats.

RESULTS: 4419 identified records were screened. 37 systematic reviews were eligible for inclusion. Most studies were narrative syntheses (N=26). Identified context categories were PPI for healthcare quality improvement (22%), patient safety (8%), community-based initiatives (27%), peer support (16 %) and education of healthcare professionals (27%). A wide range of terms was used to discuss PPI, with community participation being the most common. 28 reviews reported on frameworks, conceptual guidance and/or policy documents. Nine different types of outcomes were identified. The research gap pointed out most frequently is the lack of studies of robust designs that allow for replication and long-term follow-up, followed by studies on cost-effectiveness and resources needed. There is a need for consensus on the use of terminology.

CONCLUSIONS: This mapping review sheds light on the evolving landscape of PPI in healthcare. To advance the field, future research should prioritise rigorous study designs, cost-effectiveness assessments and consensus-building efforts to create a more unified and impactful approach for PPI in healthcare.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
BMJ Publishing Group Ltd, 2024. Vol. 14, no 9, article id e083215
Keywords [en]
Health & safety, Health Services, Medical Education & Training, Patient Participation, Patient-Centered Care, Quality in health care
National Category
Health Care Service and Management, Health Policy and Services and Health Economy
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:umu:diva-230140DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-083215ISI: 001318649500001PubMedID: 39304210Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-85204512833OAI: oai:DiVA.org:umu-230140DiVA, id: diva2:1905062
Funder
University of Gothenburg, 234336605Available from: 2024-10-11 Created: 2024-10-11 Last updated: 2024-10-11Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

fulltext(733 kB)136 downloads
File information
File name FULLTEXT01.pdfFile size 733 kBChecksum SHA-512
6fe646d5c0c1d700a6ba4d063e67a4cfdb71849c6cbbebe515a1cbebc66530f13add99b1049aabcba28fa35c18f49b2218a2f9664a16c0bcbff95a88441b34f7
Type fulltextMimetype application/pdf

Other links

Publisher's full textPubMedScopus

Authority records

Crine, Vanessa

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Crine, Vanessa
By organisation
Department of Medical and Translational Biology
In the same journal
BMJ Open
Health Care Service and Management, Health Policy and Services and Health Economy

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
Total: 136 downloads
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn
Total: 348 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf