Umeå University's logo

umu.sePublications
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
What is the "right thing to do" to achieve sustainable development?: understanding the emergence of sustainable categories
Umeå University, Faculty of Social Sciences, Umeå School of Business and Economics (USBE), Business Administration.ORCID iD: 0000-0003-4436-356X
(English)Manuscript (preprint) (Other academic)
Abstract [en]

Sustainable categories, such as “Circular business model”, represent what are seen as solutions to sustainable issues, thus guiding actors in determining what are “the right things to do”. When representing solutions that genuinely address these issues, these categories can support sustainable development. However, if misrepresenting the wrong phenomenon as solutions,they can cause harm. Thus, studying these categories emergence is crucial, which requires focusing on moral legitimacy since it is what determines if a category is sustainable. Despite its relevance, this topic has been overlooked. I address this limitation by focusing on discursive practices, and asking: how do actors discursively construct a category as morally legitimate? Based on a case study, I identify six discursive practices working through three mechanisms. I contribute to theory by providing an explanation of how categories can emerge as sustainable independently if the solution they represent are, identifying new practices and mechanisms, and substantiating previous work. I support practitioners by highlighting the need for critically assessing categories and providing a discursive toolbox.

Keywords [en]
categories, circular business model, discourse, moral legitimacy, sustainable categories, sustainable development
National Category
Business Administration
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:umu:diva-230994OAI: oai:DiVA.org:umu-230994DiVA, id: diva2:1906837
Available from: 2024-10-19 Created: 2024-10-19 Last updated: 2024-11-10
In thesis
1. Making it sustainable: understanding how business model types come to be viewed as sustainable
Open this publication in new window or tab >>Making it sustainable: understanding how business model types come to be viewed as sustainable
2024 (English)Licentiate thesis, comprehensive summary (Other academic)
Abstract [en]

Sustainability issues, such as climate change, have increasingly been studied in relation to business model types (BMTs), that is generic ways of creating and capturing value. Although research on this topic is extensive, it has largely overlooked the question of how BMTs come to be viewed as sustainable and lacks the theoretical vocabulary needed to adequately explore this question. Addressing it is critical because these BMTs play a key role in shaping firm behavior by serving as a source of legitimacy and working as templates on which firms can draw. Moreover, it is important because a BMT being viewed as sustainable is not necessarily the same as being sustainable. Consequently, BMTs can contribute positively or negatively to addressing sustainability issues through the way they shape the behavior of firms.

In my licentiate, I advance the understanding of how BMTs come to be viewed as sustainable. I do this through a systematic integrative review, conceptual development, and a case-study of the BMT Circular business model in the Swedish apparel industry. Through these methods, I make two main theoretical contributions. First, I improve the theoretical vocabulary related to how BMTs come to be viewed as sustainable, by refining existing concepts, particularly BMT, and introducing a conceptualization of "being viewed as sustainable". Second, I improve the understanding of what practices actors take and why they matter, by identifying six discursive practices and proposing three related mechanisms. I contribute to practitioners by emphasizing the need for greater reflexivity in assessing why certain BMTs are viewed as sustainable, and by providing a discursive toolbox.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Umeå: Umeå University, 2024. p. 82
Series
FE-publikationer: Handelshögskolan vid Umeå universitet, ISSN 0349-2230 ; 211
Keywords
business model, business model types, categories, discourse, moral legitimacy, sustainable categories
National Category
Business Administration
Identifiers
urn:nbn:se:umu:diva-230996 (URN)978-91-8070-507-3 (ISBN)978-91-8070-508-0 (ISBN)
Presentation
2024-10-25, NBET.A.101, Norra Beteendevetarhuset, Humanioragränd 5, 901 87 Umeå, 09:00 (English)
Opponent
Supervisors
Note

Felaktig serietillhörighet angiven i publikationen / Incorrect series affiliation indicated in the publication. 

Available from: 2024-10-21 Created: 2024-10-19 Last updated: 2025-09-10Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Authority records

Alves, Sergio

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Alves, Sergio
By organisation
Business Administration
Business Administration

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

urn-nbn

Altmetric score

urn-nbn
Total: 188 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf