Umeå University's logo

umu.sePublications
Operational message
There are currently operational disruptions. Troubleshooting is in progress.
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Conceptualising the nature, origins, and roles of business models (as) types: a systematic integrative review
Umeå University, Faculty of Social Sciences, Umeå School of Business and Economics (USBE), Business Administration.ORCID iD: 0000-0003-4436-356X
BI Norwegian Business School, Norway.ORCID iD: 0000-0001-8340-9853
Umeå University, Faculty of Social Sciences, Umeå School of Business and Economics (USBE), Business Administration.ORCID iD: 0000-0002-0186-0358
(English)Manuscript (preprint) (Other academic)
Abstract [en]

Is a business model (BM) always a BM? While there is an apparent consensus on the definition of BM as the specific way a particular organisation creates and captures value, there is simultaneously a prevalent and often implicit reference in the literature to BMs as generic ways of value creation and capture, i.e., to BMs (as) types (BMTs). However, scholars tend to conflate the two due to the use of the same label and the lack of a clear and coherent conceptualisation of BMTs, leading to faulty conclusions, hindering the accumulation of knowledge, and limiting the ability to pose novel questions. We address this issue through a systematic integrative literature review of 364 articles, focusing on the nature, origins, and roles of BMTs. We conceptualise BMTs, distinguish them from BMs, provide an integrative framework of the extant literature and establish essential avenues for future research. This review’s results offer a refined and extended understanding of BMTs, thereby advancing theory and enabling scholars to develop more rigorous and pertinent research. We also contribute to practice by providing actionable advice and a more refined vocabulary around BM(T)s.

Keywords [en]
business model, business model archetype, business model pattern, business model type, conceptual framework, literature review
National Category
Business Administration
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:umu:diva-230995OAI: oai:DiVA.org:umu-230995DiVA, id: diva2:1906838
Available from: 2024-10-19 Created: 2024-10-19 Last updated: 2024-10-21
In thesis
1. Making it sustainable: understanding how business model types come to be viewed as sustainable
Open this publication in new window or tab >>Making it sustainable: understanding how business model types come to be viewed as sustainable
2024 (English)Licentiate thesis, comprehensive summary (Other academic)
Abstract [en]

Sustainability issues, such as climate change, have increasingly been studied in relation to business model types (BMTs), that is generic ways of creating and capturing value. Although research on this topic is extensive, it has largely overlooked the question of how BMTs come to be viewed as sustainable and lacks the theoretical vocabulary needed to adequately explore this question. Addressing it is critical because these BMTs play a key role in shaping firm behavior by serving as a source of legitimacy and working as templates on which firms can draw. Moreover, it is important because a BMT being viewed as sustainable is not necessarily the same as being sustainable. Consequently, BMTs can contribute positively or negatively to addressing sustainability issues through the way they shape the behavior of firms.

In my licentiate, I advance the understanding of how BMTs come to be viewed as sustainable. I do this through a systematic integrative review, conceptual development, and a case-study of the BMT Circular business model in the Swedish apparel industry. Through these methods, I make two main theoretical contributions. First, I improve the theoretical vocabulary related to how BMTs come to be viewed as sustainable, by refining existing concepts, particularly BMT, and introducing a conceptualization of "being viewed as sustainable". Second, I improve the understanding of what practices actors take and why they matter, by identifying six discursive practices and proposing three related mechanisms. I contribute to practitioners by emphasizing the need for greater reflexivity in assessing why certain BMTs are viewed as sustainable, and by providing a discursive toolbox.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Umeå: Umeå University, 2024. p. 82
Series
FE-publikationer: Handelshögskolan vid Umeå universitet, ISSN 0349-2230 ; 211
Keywords
business model, business model types, categories, discourse, moral legitimacy, sustainable categories
National Category
Business Administration
Identifiers
urn:nbn:se:umu:diva-230996 (URN)978-91-8070-507-3 (ISBN)978-91-8070-508-0 (ISBN)
Presentation
2024-10-25, NBET.A.101, Norra Beteendevetarhuset, Humanioragränd 5, 901 87 Umeå, 09:00 (English)
Opponent
Supervisors
Note

Felaktig serietillhörighet angiven i publikationen / Incorrect series affiliation indicated in the publication. 

Available from: 2024-10-21 Created: 2024-10-19 Last updated: 2025-09-10Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Authority records

Alves, SergioNair, SujithStål, Herman

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Alves, SergioNair, SujithStål, Herman
By organisation
Business Administration
Business Administration

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

urn-nbn

Altmetric score

urn-nbn
Total: 327 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf