Umeå University's logo

umu.sePublications
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Feedback in mathematics education research: a systematic literature review
Umeå University, Faculty of Science and Technology, Umeå Mathematics Education Research Centre (UMERC). Umeå University, Faculty of Science and Technology, Department of Science and Mathematics Education. (Formativ bedömning)ORCID iD: 0000-0002-2863-0499
Umeå University, Faculty of Science and Technology, Umeå Mathematics Education Research Centre (UMERC). Umeå University, Faculty of Science and Technology, Department of Science and Mathematics Education. (Formativ bedömning)ORCID iD: 0000-0003-0895-8232
2024 (English)In: Research in Mathematics Education, ISSN 1479-4802, E-ISSN 1754-0178Article in journal (Refereed) Epub ahead of print
Abstract [en]

Research shows that feedback can have large positive effects on student achievement, but that effects vary considerably. Some of the variables that influence feedback’s effects are the characteristics of the feedback. When making decisions on which research to pursue, knowledge about the focus of previous research is useful. We conducted a systematic literature review of studies that address feedback in mathematics. The aim was to identify which feedback characteristics are addressed in the reviewed publications, which characteristics have been given ample research attention and which have been neglected. We searched for publications from 2012–2021 in three bibliographic databases: ERIC, Psychinfo, and Academic Search Premier. We identified 12 feedback categories and 5 variables which together describe the characteristics of the feedback in the publications found in the literature search. Feedback about the correctness of students’ answers and solution processes were common characteristics, while feedback on students’ self-regulation was uncommon.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Routledge, 2024.
National Category
Pedagogical Work Didactics
Research subject
didactics of mathematics
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:umu:diva-231982DOI: 10.1080/14794802.2024.2401488ISI: 001314917800001Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-85204202614OAI: oai:DiVA.org:umu-231982DiVA, id: diva2:1914618
Available from: 2024-11-20 Created: 2024-11-20 Last updated: 2025-07-15

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Other links

Publisher's full textScopus

Authority records

Söderström, SharminPalm, Torulf

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Söderström, SharminPalm, Torulf
By organisation
Umeå Mathematics Education Research Centre (UMERC)Department of Science and Mathematics Education
In the same journal
Research in Mathematics Education
Pedagogical WorkDidactics

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
urn-nbn
Total: 288 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf