Umeå universitets logga

umu.sePublikationer
Ändra sökning
RefereraExporteraLänk till posten
Permanent länk

Direktlänk
Referera
Referensformat
  • apa
  • ieee
  • vancouver
  • Annat format
Fler format
Språk
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Annat språk
Fler språk
Utmatningsformat
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Ultrasonic dissection versus electrocautery dissection in laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis: a randomized controlled trial (SONOCHOL-trial)
Department of Clinical Science and Education, Södersjukhuset, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden; Centre for Clinical Research Dalarna, Uppsala University, Falun, Sweden; Department of Surgery, Mora Lasarett, Mora, Sweden.
Department of Clinical Science and Education, Södersjukhuset, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Umeå universitet, Medicinska fakulteten, Institutionen för diagnostik och intervention. Umeå universitet, Medicinska fakulteten, Institutionen för kirurgisk och perioperativ vetenskap, Kirurgi. Division of Orthopedics and Biotechnology, Department of Clinical Science, Intervention and Technology, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.ORCID-id: 0000-0001-8947-4736
Umeå universitet, Medicinska fakulteten, Institutionen för diagnostik och intervention. Umeå universitet, Medicinska fakulteten, Institutionen för kirurgisk och perioperativ vetenskap, Kirurgi.ORCID-id: 0000-0001-6897-2058
Visa övriga samt affilieringar
2024 (Engelska)Ingår i: World Journal of Emergency Surgery, E-ISSN 1749-7922, Vol. 19, nr 1, artikel-id 34Artikel i tidskrift (Refereegranskat) Published
Abstract [en]

BACKGROUND: Laparoscopic cholecystectomy with ultrasonic dissection presents a compelling alternative to conventional electrocautery. The evidence for elective cholecystectomy supports the adoption of ultrasonic dissection, citing advantages such as reduced operating time, diminished bleeding, shorter hospital stays and decreased postoperative pain and nausea. However, the efficacy of this procedure in emergency surgery and patients diagnosed with acute cholecystitis remains uncertain. The aim of this study was to compare outcomes of electrocautery and ultrasonic dissection in patients with acute cholecystitis.

METHODS: A randomized, parallel, double-blinded, multicentre controlled trial was conducted across eight Swedish hospitals. Eligible participants were individuals aged ≥ 18 years with acute cholecystitis lasting ≤ 7 days. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy was performed in the emergency setting as soon as local circumstances permitted. Random allocation to electrocautery or ultrasonic dissection was performed in a 1:1 ratio. The primary endpoint was the total complication rate, analysed using an intention-to-treat approach. The primary outcome was analysed using logistic generalized estimated equations. Patients, postoperative caregivers, and follow-up personnel were blinded to group assignment.

RESULTS: From September 2019 to March 2023, 300 patients were enrolled and randomly assigned to electrocautery dissection (n = 148) and ultrasonic dissection (n = 152). No significant difference in complication rate was observed between the groups (risk difference [RD] 1.6%, 95% confidence interval [CI], - 7.2% to 10.4%, P = 0.720). No significant disparities in operating time, conversion rate, hospital stay or readmission rates between the groups were noted. Haemostatic agents were more frequently used in electrocautery dissection (RD 10.6%, 95% CI, 1.3% to 19.8%, P = 0.025).

CONCLUSIONS: Ultrasonic dissection and electrocautery dissection demonstrate comparable risks for complications in emergency surgery for patients with acute cholecystitis. Ultrasonic dissection is a viable alternative to electrocautery dissection or can be used as a complementary method in laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis.

TRIAL REGISTRATION: The trial was registered prior to conducting the research on  http://clinical.trials.gov, NCT03014817.

Ort, förlag, år, upplaga, sidor
BioMed Central (BMC), 2024. Vol. 19, nr 1, artikel-id 34
Nyckelord [en]
Acute care surgery, Acute cholecystitis, Electrocoagulation, Electrosurgery, General surgery, Laparoscopic cholecystectomy, Minimally invasive surgical procedures, Ultrasonic surgical procedures
Nationell ämneskategori
Kirurgi
Identifikatorer
URN: urn:nbn:se:umu:diva-232216DOI: 10.1186/s13017-024-00565-4ISI: 001353697100001PubMedID: 39538278Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-85209189339OAI: oai:DiVA.org:umu-232216DiVA, id: diva2:1916463
Forskningsfinansiär
Karolinska InstitutetRegion StockholmTillgänglig från: 2024-11-27 Skapad: 2024-11-27 Senast uppdaterad: 2024-12-02Bibliografiskt granskad

Open Access i DiVA

fulltext(1154 kB)59 nedladdningar
Filinformation
Filnamn FULLTEXT01.pdfFilstorlek 1154 kBChecksumma SHA-512
30e1d8bc5d1df22621e56bd66ca7bd4986eb52d0416e636c86972355298ec1894689a74b391ca4bc6409dd88b2e2b55809d1277d6c972ded71a1591ea2936b6e
Typ fulltextMimetyp application/pdf

Övriga länkar

Förlagets fulltextPubMedScopus

Person

Enochsson, LarsCengiz, YücelBayadsi, HaythamHennings, Joakim

Sök vidare i DiVA

Av författaren/redaktören
Enochsson, LarsCengiz, YücelBayadsi, HaythamHennings, Joakim
Av organisationen
Institutionen för diagnostik och interventionKirurgi
I samma tidskrift
World Journal of Emergency Surgery
Kirurgi

Sök vidare utanför DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
Totalt: 60 nedladdningar
Antalet nedladdningar är summan av nedladdningar för alla fulltexter. Det kan inkludera t.ex tidigare versioner som nu inte längre är tillgängliga.

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn

Altmetricpoäng

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn
Totalt: 399 träffar
RefereraExporteraLänk till posten
Permanent länk

Direktlänk
Referera
Referensformat
  • apa
  • ieee
  • vancouver
  • Annat format
Fler format
Språk
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Annat språk
Fler språk
Utmatningsformat
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf