Umeå University's logo

umu.sePublications
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Implementation strategies for decentralized management of multidrug-resistant tuberculosis: insights from community health systems in Zambia
Department of Health Promotion and Education, School of Public Health, University of Zambia, Lusaka, Zambia; Department of Health Policy and Management, School of Public Health, University of Zambia, Lusaka, Zambia.
Department of Health Promotion and Education, School of Public Health, University of Zambia, Lusaka, Zambia; Department of Health Policy and Management, School of Public Health, University of Zambia, Lusaka, Zambia.ORCID iD: 0000-0001-8920-009X
Department of Community and Family Medicine, School of Public Health, University of Zambia, Lusaka, Zambia.
Umeå University, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Epidemiology and Global Health. Department of Community and Family Medicine, School of Public Health, University of Zambia, Lusaka, Zambia.ORCID iD: 0000-0003-1189-7194
Show others and affiliations
2024 (English)In: Archives of Public Health, ISSN 0778-7367, E-ISSN 2049-3258, Vol. 82, no 1, article id 157Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Background: Decentralized management approaches for multi-drug-resistant tuberculosis (MDR TB) have shown improved treatment outcomes in patients. However, challenges remain in the delivery of decentralized MDR TB services. Further, implementation strategies for effectively delivering the services in community health systems (CHSs) in low-resource settings have not been fully described, as most strategies are known and effective in high-income settings. Our research aimed to delineate the specific implementation strategies employed in managing MDR TB in Zambia.

Methods: Our qualitative case study involved 112 in-depth interviews with a diverse group of participants, including healthcare workers, community health workers, patients, caregivers, and health managers in nine districts. We categorized implementation strategies using the Expert Recommendations for Implementing Change (ERIC) compilation and later grouped them into three CHS lenses: programmatic, relational, and collective action.

Results: The programmatic lens comprised four implementation strategies: (1) changing infrastructure through refurbishing and expanding health facilities to accommodate management of MDR TB, (2) adapting and tailoring clinical and diagnostic services to the context through implementing tailored strategies, (3) training and educating health providers through ongoing training, and (4) using evaluative and iterative strategies to review program performance, which involved development and organization of quality monitoring systems, as well as audits. Relational lens strategies were (1) providing interactive assistance through offering local technical assistance in clinical expert committees and (2) providing support to clinicians through developing health worker and community health worker outreach teams. Finally, the main collective action lens strategy was engaging consumers; the discrete strategies were increasing demand using community networks and events and involving patients and family members.

Conclusion: This study builds on the ERIC implementation strategies by stressing the need to fully consider interrelations or embeddedness of CHS strategies during implementation processes. For example, to work effectively, the programmatic lens strategies need to be supported by strategies that promote meaningful community engagement (the relational lens) and should be attuned to strategies that promote community mobilization (collective action lens).

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
BioMed Central (BMC), 2024. Vol. 82, no 1, article id 157
Keywords [en]
Implementation strategies, Community health systems, Decentralized programmatic management of multidrug-resistant tuberculosis, Zambia
National Category
Public Health, Global Health, Social Medicine and Epidemiology
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:umu:diva-232528DOI: 10.1186/s13690-024-01384-4ISI: 001312142800002PubMedID: 39277746Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-85204178308OAI: oai:DiVA.org:umu-232528DiVA, id: diva2:1917592
Available from: 2024-12-03 Created: 2024-12-03 Last updated: 2024-12-03Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

fulltext(1176 kB)6 downloads
File information
File name FULLTEXT01.pdfFile size 1176 kBChecksum SHA-512
635ab84451d7582bced594d1fb9dd5ed141940e18c7e35061a2d0f6d57ce6243aff75323799c81ab28335a6c9e2cfe17e5daf98993bf2b135e6be445ea7a0348
Type fulltextMimetype application/pdf

Other links

Publisher's full textPubMedScopus

Authority records

Malizgani, Chavula PaulSilumbwe, Adam

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Maritim, PatriciaMalizgani, Chavula PaulSilumbwe, Adam
By organisation
Department of Epidemiology and Global Health
In the same journal
Archives of Public Health
Public Health, Global Health, Social Medicine and Epidemiology

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
Total: 7 downloads
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn
Total: 203 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf