Umeå University's logo

umu.sePublications
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Exploring the acceptability of a risk prediction tool for cardiometabolic risk (gestational diabetes and hypertensive disorders of pregnancy) for use in early pregnancy: a qualitative study
Monash Centre for Health Research and Implementation, School of Clinical Sciences, Monash University, Victoria, Australia.
Centre for Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, University of Melbourne, VIC, Melbourne, Australia; Department of General Practice and Primary Care, University of Melbourne, VIC, Melbourne, Australia.
Monash Centre for Health Research and Implementation, School of Clinical Sciences, Monash University, Victoria, Australia.
Monash Centre for Health Research and Implementation, School of Clinical Sciences, Monash University, Victoria, Australia; Department of General Practice and Primary Care, University of Melbourne, VIC, Melbourne, Australia.
Show others and affiliations
2025 (English)In: Midwifery, ISSN 0266-6138, E-ISSN 1532-3099, Vol. 141, article id 104270Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Problem/ Background: The acceptability of providing women with personalised cardiometabolic risk information using risk prediction tools early in pregnancy is not well understood.

Aim: To explore women's and healthcare professionals’ perspectives of the acceptability of a prognostic, composite risk prediction tool for cardiometabolic risk (gestational diabetes and/or hypertensive disorders of pregnancy) for use in early pregnancy.

Methods: Semi-structured interviews were conducted to explore the acceptability of cardiometabolic risk prediction tools, preferences for risk communication and considerations for implementation into antenatal care. The Theoretical Framework of Acceptability informed interview questions. Transcripts were thematically analysed.

Findings: Women ≤24 weeks’ gestation (n = 13) and healthcare professionals (n = 8), including midwives (n = 2), general practitioners (n = 2), obstetricians (n = 2), an endocrinologist (n = 1) and cardiologist (n = 1) participated. Participants indicated that providing personalised risk information is only appropriate when preventative measures can be initiated to mitigate risks. Differentiating the risk for each condition (single risk outputs) was often preferred to composite risk outputs to enable targeted monitoring and management. Defining conditions and risks to mother/baby, visually depicting personalised risk scores, and providing clear, patient-centred clinical management plans were recommended. Supportive clinical policy changes, staff engagement/training, and integration into electronic health records were suggested to facilitate uptake into routine antenatal care.

Conclusion: Women and healthcare professionals suggested that early pregnancy cardiometabolic risk prediction tools may be acceptable when preventative interventions are available to reduce risks. Risk prediction tools with integrated patient-centred education materials may promote timely access and engagement with preventative interventions to optimise women's current and future health.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Elsevier, 2025. Vol. 141, article id 104270
Keywords [en]
Diabetes, Gestational, Hypertension, Pregnancy Outcomes, Pregnancy-Induced, Prenatal Care, Risk Communication
National Category
Gynaecology, Obstetrics and Reproductive Medicine
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:umu:diva-233841DOI: 10.1016/j.midw.2024.104270ISI: 001398956600001PubMedID: 39755013Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-85213874047OAI: oai:DiVA.org:umu-233841DiVA, id: diva2:1926506
Available from: 2025-01-13 Created: 2025-01-13 Last updated: 2025-02-11Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Other links

Publisher's full textPubMedScopus

Authority records

De Silva, Kushan

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
De Silva, Kushan
By organisation
Department of Diagnostics and Intervention
In the same journal
Midwifery
Gynaecology, Obstetrics and Reproductive Medicine

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn
Total: 53 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf