When I becomes We
2023 (Engelska)Övrigt (Övrigt vetenskapligt) [Forskning på konstnärlig grund]
Resurstyp
Blandat innehåll
Fysisk beskrivning [en]
Experiment and performance concerning networked social interaction using the Nuna machine, a kind of teleprompter with specific software and a robotic camera. The Nuna allows users to authentically experience eye contact in the virtual world, transforming online meetings into personal connections. Nuna provides unique control over eye contact and time delay, factors that are central in the human awareness for being together in a moment.
Abstract [en]
Press release:
The performance will see artists experiment with new forms of networked social interaction. At the heart of the installation will be the Nuna machine itself, a kind of teleprompter with specific software and a robotic camera. The Nuna allows users to authentically experience eye contact in the virtual world. It is designed to identify new opportunities for transforming detached online meetings into “real” personal connections. Major ventures within the same realm have recently been launched by Google (Project Starline) and Apple (Vision Pro). What makes the Nuna stand out (except that it works, right now) is the immediate control over eye contact and time delay, factors that are central in the human system for being together in a moment, and in its extension gives clearer understanding of what’s missing in normal online interactions. Combining the Nuna technology with an artistic investigation of the phenomena of interpresence, this project breakes new ground within multiple fields.
Working across design, art, AI, psychology, neuroscience, and mathematics, the Interpresence Intstitute are using all available methods for putting focus on that special feeling of being present, together. The team: Christoffel Kuenen, Umeå Institute of Design; Gabriel Bohm Calles, Academy of Fine Art ;Niclas Kaiser, Dept of Psychology; David Risberg, Umeå Institute of Design; Performers: Amalia Wänman, Peter Andersson (friday & saturday), Lollo Aurell (friday), Sef Aurell (saturday).
Abstract [en]
Summary of the performance/exeperiment:
When the sound stops working in the middle of a concert. When a speaker is interrupted by a member of the audience and chooses to listen and respond. The show we expected stops and another kind of contact becomes possible. When the form is broken, we become visible, or rather, our capacity for contact comes to the fore and becomes apparent to us. Niclas Kaiser's and Emily Butler's theory of social breathing focuses on this ability which, like hearing, is something we cannot turn off and which shapes our entire world without us noticing.
During the 70s, the artist Dan Graham worked with mirrors, video cameras and monitors to create shifts in our perception of time, the present, and ourselves. In Time Delay Room, he shifted the viewer's experience away from the work to their experience of themself as a viewer. On a wall, two monitors show the room they are mounted in but from two different angles. When the visitor enters, they expect to see themselves on the screens but the room remains empty. Only after an eight-second delay do they see themselves stepping into the left monitor while the right keeps showing an empty room. Only after another eight seconds do they appear on the right one as well. Eight seconds is the limit of what we can hold in our immediate memory and perceive as the present. The result is that the visitor can never fully identify with what they see on the screens, but instead gets stuck in a constant observation of themselves.
The artist Janet Cardiff has worked with hearing and sound as a starting point for over 30 years. In installations and audiowalks (voice-guided walks), she has explored both the associative power of sound and hearing as one of our primary senses. In the work The 40 part motet we encounter the sound recording of a choral piece, but Cardiff has recorded each of the singers alone and presents the work with a loudspeaker for each voice. 40 speakers in a ring together manifest the striking discrepancy between the embodied voice and our expected experience of a sound recording.
What is happening here and how is it related to our work? The philosopher and dancer Susan Kozel has for many years worked on formulating phenomenological experiences of a technologically expanded corporeality. In her book Closer, she describes what phenomenologists call the 'pre-reflective' state. A state that allows us to step around preconceived notions and meet and experience something new. We can visit this state (never dwell) in several ways. Partly by simply arresting our assessing and categorizing the situation, but also through, for example, improvisation. As a performing artist, Kozel easily draws parallels to music and dance when she describes the role of improvisation in her work and that of others. By changing, among other things, rhythm and tempo, an experience can go from slow and contemplative to fast and changing. She further says that improvisation can be used to break up the everyday and thus make the invisible visible. There is a strong relation between improvisation and play.
Graham and Cardiff both manage to engage their viewers bodily. The works are open in such a way that any meaning is subordinate to the fact that in a pre-reflective stage we know how to deal with them and simply start to play. In documentation of Graham's Time Delay Room, we see visitors bewilderedly waving to themselves with no response. Once they realize what is going on, many laugh and get caught up in a kind of strange game of contact with themselves.
Visitors to The 40 Part Motet immediately begin to interact with the work. They walk along the rows of speakers, approach them from behind, try to create their own sections and find the nearest voices. Some experiment with walking past the speakers at different speeds. Others are left standing with a big smile on their face.
Nuna provides the possibility of eye contact in a screen conversation. Here, Nuna breaks the expected, normal experience and potentially enables a contact previously reserved for the direct meeting between people in the same room. This is a technique that until now only existed in science fiction. In Star Trek where Captain Picard addresses alien captains directly through the 'main viewer'. But also in 1984 where the training instructor suddenly addresses Smith personally and scolds him for not performing the movements correctly. The fact that the technology is new creates a window for spontaneous play. The same isolation of a particular experience of what it means to be human occurs here as in Graham's and Cardiff's work. By further handing over the ability to manipulate both the degree of eye contact and the delay of sound and image to the visitors, we hope to create a similar environment of play. By shaking up the form, our natural ability for making and keeping contact comes to the fore. When is it there? When does it break? How do we maintain it and what tests can it withstand?
This is our first experiment with Nuna, which will form the basis for developing artistic investigations based in clinical psychology of the natural and automatic processes that enable all human contact.
Ort, förlag, år, sidor
Umeå: Umeå University, 2023.
Kanal
UmArts Open Studio, June 16-17, 2023
Nyckelord [en]
being together; aesthetics, artistic research, presence, interpresence
Nationell ämneskategori
Design Scenkonst Människa-datorinteraktion (interaktionsdesign) Psykologi
Forskningsämne
estetik
Identifikatorer
URN: urn:nbn:se:umu:diva-236171OAI: oai:DiVA.org:umu-236171DiVA, id: diva2:1942858
Anmärkning
Performance script by Gabirel Bohm Calles:
The performance:
Three performers will have the library as their base. They will engage in various activities. Mainly talking. They will take turns being closest to the Nuna so that when someone at Smedjan looks in to the one there, there will be someone at the other end already engaged in an activity by themselves or with others out of view. The performer will then engage the new participant in conversation. After a short while they will propose a shared activity: 1.Continue talking (which they will just do. They won't present it as a task) but go into bigger or more personal questions of a not unsettling or offensive nature, but still closer than we are used to. 2.Mimic each other wordlessly (?). Here is an excellent opportunity to mess with the connection. 3.Each answer a question that is written in an envelope in front of the Nuna at Smedjan. They will then come up with a new question together for the Smedjan participant to write down and place in the envelope (we will save these questions afterwards). 4.Draw each other. It would be great to switch off the eye tracking here after a while to see how they deal with the fact that the angle have changed. 5.With out breaking eye contact, telling each other who they are. 6.Dance. The three performers perform a simple and slow dance, but now they invite the person to come down to the library to experience it there instead of through the Nuna. There, they will be given the choice to participate and given the very simple instructions. The dance is simply three or four gestures that signal either confusion, searching for contact or contemplation. The performers look straigt ahead and use their periferal vision to determine what their colleagues are doing, to which they will adapt. At any point can any one of them decide to shift movement. The others will then adapt in their own time. The performers are encouraged to put into words with each other, their experiences and can at any point start sharing them with each other. At these times they will place themselves so that one is directly in front of the Nuna. They can also seat themselves the same way and just talk about whatever they want. This can be good to normalize the situation sometimes and make them feel in control of their space more. They can then invite anyone who shows up in front of the Nuna to join their conversation. At some times the performers are encouraged to take out their phones and break contact with the Smedjan participants, just to see what happens when the contact is broken (two screens removed hehe). At some points one of the performers can also leave the library and join us at Smedjan for a short while. It would be great if they could find a person they had already talked to and re-perform a task they did together earlier.
What do we do at Smedjan? We monitor what's happening with the Nunas. We talk to people who've just used it. We can suggest new tasks or changes to the performers if we come up with them. If there are very few people there, I suggest we first let everyone look at what's happening at the Nuna. Then after one interaction or after a few minutes of one, we encourage the other people to join us in conversation about what is going on rather and give the participants some privacy. We encourage them to try it themselves if they want to know what it was like. If there are a lot of people I think we should sort of do the same, so that we create a different focus point in the room. If there aren't already other things happening at the same time. We don't know this yet. I would propose that we sometimes hold on to some papers or que cards, as if we are about to speak (or maybe lead a game show). We should at least try it, to see what it does to how people percieve us (are you free to talk to? Is something already going on? Are you 'really here'?). I have some other ideas for similar subtle signals to play with to see if we can change the connection with people as well. We could also go down when they are dancing and join in as well. But not all of us at the same time. A possibility is to perform the dance together in the space as an ending. Might be cheezy. I'm not sure. I'm watching a lot of Teletubbies so my perception of what is cheezy or over the top is a bit skewed.
2025-03-062025-03-062025-03-11Bibliografiskt granskad