A transdisciplinary, comparative analysis reveals key risks from Arctic permafrost thawAustrian Polar Research Institute (APRI), Vienna, Austria; b.geos, Korneuburg, Austria.
CEARC Research Center, Université Paris Saclay, Orsay, France.
Geotop Research Center in Earth System Dynamics, Département des Sciences de la Terre et de l’Atmosphère, Université du Québec à Montréal, QC, Montréal, Canada.
Department of Physical Geography and Bolin Centre for Climate Research, Stockholm University, Stockholm, Sweden.
Permafrost Research Section, Alfred Wegener Institute Helmholtz Centre for Polar and Marine Research, Potsdam, Germany.
Stefansson Arctic Institute and University of Akureyri, Akureyri, Iceland.
Nordregio, Stockholm, Sweden.
Permafrost Research Section, Alfred Wegener Institute Helmholtz Centre for Polar and Marine Research, Potsdam, Germany; Institute of Geosciences, University of Potsdam, Potsdam, Germany.
Stefansson Arctic Institute and University of Akureyri, Akureyri, Iceland.
Institute of Polar Sciences, National Research Council, Venice, Italy; Department of Environmental Sciences, Informatics and Statistics, Ca’ Foscari University of Venice, Venice, Italy.
Austrian Polar Research Institute (APRI), Vienna, Austria; Centre for Microbiology and Environmental Systems Science, University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Department of Geography and Environmental Sciences, Northumbria University, Newcastle, United Kingdom.
Max Planck Institute for Meteorology, Hamburg, Germany; Center for Earth System Research and Sustainability, University of Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany.
Permafrost Research Section, Alfred Wegener Institute Helmholtz Centre for Polar and Marine Research, Potsdam, Germany.
Department of Social and Cultural Anthropology, University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; Austrian Polar Research Institute (APRI), Vienna, Austria.
Research Unit of Biomedicine and Internal Medicine, University of Oulu, Oulu, Finland.
Department of Social and Cultural Anthropology, University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; Austrian Polar Research Institute (APRI), Vienna, Austria.
Department of Earth Sciences, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands; School of Environmental Studies, University of Victoria, BC, Victoria, Canada.
Department of Environmental & Resource Engineering, Technical University of Denmark, Kongens Lyngby, Denmark.
Biomedicine and Internal Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Oulu, Oulu, Finland.
Laboratoire CEARC, Paris Saclay University, Université de Versailles Saint-Quentin-en-Yvelines, Guyancourt, France; Centre for the Study of the Sciences and the Humanities, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway.
Department of Earth Sciences, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands.
Grid Arendal, Arendal, Norway.
Department of Environmental & Resource Engineering, Technical University of Denmark, Kongens Lyngby, Denmark.
Visa övriga samt affilieringar
2025 (Engelska)Ingår i: Communications Earth & Environment, E-ISSN 2662-4435, Vol. 6, nr 1, artikel-id 21Artikel i tidskrift (Refereegranskat) Published
Abstract [en]
Permafrost thaw poses diverse risks to Arctic environments and livelihoods. Understanding the effects of permafrost thaw is vital for informed policymaking and adaptation efforts. Here, we present the consolidated findings of a risk analysis spanning four study regions: Longyearbyen (Svalbard, Norway), the Avannaata municipality (Greenland), the Beaufort Sea region and the Mackenzie River Delta (Canada) and the Bulunskiy District of the Sakha Republic (Russia). Local stakeholders' and scientists' perceptions shaped our understanding of the risks as dynamic, socionatural phenomena involving physical processes, key hazards, and societal consequences. Through an inter- and transdisciplinary risk analysis based on multidirectional knowledge exchanges and thematic network analysis, we identified five key hazards of permafrost thaw. These include infrastructure failure, disruption of mobility and supplies, decreased water quality, challenges for food security, and exposure to diseases and contaminants. The study's novelty resides in the comparative approach spanning different disciplines, environmental and societal contexts, and the transdisciplinary synthesis considering various risk perceptions.
Ort, förlag, år, upplaga, sidor
Springer Nature, 2025. Vol. 6, nr 1, artikel-id 21
Nationell ämneskategori
Klimatvetenskap
Identifikatorer
URN: urn:nbn:se:umu:diva-236122DOI: 10.1038/s43247-024-01883-wISI: 001401402600003PubMedID: 39830898Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-85218114608OAI: oai:DiVA.org:umu-236122DiVA, id: diva2:1942952
Forskningsfinansiär
EU, Horisont 2020, 773421EU, Horisont 2020, 101133587Finlands Akademi, 356604
Anmärkning
Correction: Gartler, S., Scheer, J., Meyer, A. et al. Author Correction: A transdisciplinary, comparative analysis reveals key risks from Arctic permafrost thaw. Commun Earth Environ 6, 234 (2025). DOI: 10.1038/s43247-025-02204-5
2025-03-072025-03-072025-04-15Bibliografiskt granskad