Umeå University's logo

umu.sePublications
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Conditions for and potential solutions associated with continuity of care for patients with complex care needs across Swedish regions with differing population densities
Department of Health and Caring Sciences, Linnaeus University, Kalmar, Växjö, Sweden.
Academic Primary Healthcare Centre, Stockholm Health Care Services, Stockholm, Sweden; Department of Learning, Informatics, Management and Ethics, Medical Management Centre, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Department of Health and Caring Sciences, Linnaeus University, Kalmar, Växjö, Sweden; Department of Learning, Informatics, Management and Ethics, Medical Management Centre, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Umeå University, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Epidemiology and Global Health. The Centre for Rural Health, Region Västerbotten, Stationsgatan 3, Storuman, Sweden.ORCID iD: 0000-0003-3220-9557
Show others and affiliations
2025 (English)In: BMC Health Services Research, E-ISSN 1472-6963, Vol. 25, no 1, article id 614Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Background: This study, conducted across three distinct geographical regions in Sweden, highlights the diverse conditions and challenges in healthcare provision. The study focuses on the sparsely populated northern regions of Sweden, the capital city of Stockholm, and the southeast rural area of Sweden. Each location presents unique obstacles to continuity of care, influenced by factors such as population density and geographical disparities. By examining the experiences of patients with complex care needs, their family carers, and healthcare personnel, this study aims to describe the conditions for and identify potential solutions associated with the delivery of continuity in care in different geographical regions of Sweden, with differing population densities.

Method: Secondary analysis was conducted using qualitative content analysis on interview data from two studies, consisting of 53 transcripts from individual, pair, and focus group interviews held between August 2018 and November 2019. The potential solutions identified from participants’ experiences were categorized into region-specific and common themes. Three personas—Vera, Bo, and Inga—were developed, each representing a scenario based on the region-specific analyses.

Results: Despite regional differences, universal solutions to common challenges were identified focusing on relational, management, and informational aspects. Common key obstacles to continuity of care included resource shortages, insufficient information transfer, and privacy regulations. Possible solutions for overcoming these challenges include prioritizing relational continuity, streamlining processes, and advocating for a unified communication system. By collaborating, building trust, understanding patient preferences, and ensuring clear communication, healthcare personnel can effectively promote continuity of care.

Conclusions: Building a stable workforce while prioritizing relational continuity, along with patients’ preferences and needs, is essential for ensuring continuity of care from multiple providers. Digital solutions can enhance collaboration across distances, while coordinating responsibilities within smaller geographical areas can strengthen partnerships among healthcare organizations. Direct dialogue, along with ensuring that everyone has access to relevant information through a unified communication system, is vital for management continuity. By integrating these universal and transferable solutions to the obstacles associated with continuity of care, we can create a cohesive care experience for patients, regardless of geographical and demographic conditions.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2025. Vol. 25, no 1, article id 614
Keywords [en]
Collaboration, Communication, Continuity of patient care, Coordination, Integrated care, Patient care management, Person-centered care
National Category
Health Care Service and Management, Health Policy and Services and Health Economy
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:umu:diva-238605DOI: 10.1186/s12913-025-12649-1PubMedID: 40296109Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-105003826416OAI: oai:DiVA.org:umu-238605DiVA, id: diva2:1958233
Funder
Forte, Swedish Research Council for Health, Working Life and Welfare, 2017–00202]Available from: 2025-05-14 Created: 2025-05-14 Last updated: 2025-05-14Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

fulltext(1524 kB)17 downloads
File information
File name FULLTEXT01.pdfFile size 1524 kBChecksum SHA-512
e0a1b0ccb80848caa1bc666e5af532f4f671f1ae1cef51145ad654ba7735cd1d776e49a4979d1ab11c0166433b19a7974ac815b31eb03bb12e96fb305c539412
Type fulltextMimetype application/pdf

Other links

Publisher's full textPubMedScopus

Authority records

Edin-Liljegren, Anette

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Edin-Liljegren, Anette
By organisation
Department of Epidemiology and Global Health
In the same journal
BMC Health Services Research
Health Care Service and Management, Health Policy and Services and Health Economy

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
Total: 18 downloads
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn
Total: 1468 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf