Umeå University's logo

umu.sePublications
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
A qualitative comparison of data infrastructures for COVID-19 health-related data: lessons for the European Health Data Space
Department of Experimental Oncology, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS (IEO), Milan, Italy; Ethox Centre, Nuffield Department of Population Health, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.
Umeå University, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Clinical Microbiology.ORCID iD: 0000-0001-9215-4047
Department of Public Health, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Department of Public Health, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Show others and affiliations
2026 (English)In: Policy Studies, ISSN 0144-2872, E-ISSN 1470-1006, Vol. 47, no 2, p. 338-358Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

The COVID-19 pandemic has represented the first global health emergency to be tackled through widespread data collection via a broad array of digital health technologies. Throughout Europe, data infrastructures for the acquisition, processing, and management of COVID-19 data were either implemented ex novo or "repurposed" towards this end. Analysing and comparing these data practices may hold great value to the upcoming European Health Data Space (EHDS) implementation. This study investigates the implementation of COVID-19 data infrastructures in four European countries–Italy, Sweden, Denmark, and England–to highlight challenges related to technical, ethical, and legal aspects of secondary uses of health-related data, particularly given the implementation of the EHDS. The data infrastructures included in the study reveal profound differences in design and data access practices, partly owing to the social contexts in which they were established. Challenges for data-sharing and integration include fragmentation of standards and requirements, ethical concerns about access by corporate actors to publicly collected datasets, and lack of robust legal bases. Investigating such infrastructures is crucial to probe challenges in data sharing practices within the European context and represents a revealing test case to anticipate opportunities and challenges in aligning current technical and legal standards with EHDS' requirements.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Routledge, 2026. Vol. 47, no 2, p. 338-358
Keywords [en]
COVID-19, Data infrastructures, EHDS, European Health Data Space, Health data sharing
National Category
Health Care Service and Management, Health Policy and Services and Health Economy
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:umu:diva-238752DOI: 10.1080/01442872.2025.2486159ISI: 001461987200001Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-105002642844OAI: oai:DiVA.org:umu-238752DiVA, id: diva2:1961887
Funder
EU, European Research Council, 101096999Available from: 2025-05-28 Created: 2025-05-28 Last updated: 2026-05-20Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Other links

Publisher's full textScopus

Authority records

Fors Connolly, Anne-Marie

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Fors Connolly, Anne-Marie
By organisation
Department of Clinical Microbiology
In the same journal
Policy Studies
Health Care Service and Management, Health Policy and Services and Health Economy

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
urn-nbn
Total: 76 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf