Umeå University's logo

umu.sePublications
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Unlocking the potential of biosphere reserves: a review of structural, institutional, and ideational challenges to transformational learning
Umeå University, Faculty of Social Sciences, Department of Political Science.ORCID iD: 0000-0002-7674-6197
Umeå University, Faculty of Social Sciences, Department of Political Science.ORCID iD: 0000-0001-5582-9877
Department of Forest Ecology & Management, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Umeå, Sweden.
2025 (English)In: Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, ISSN 1877-3435, E-ISSN 1877-3443, Vol. 75, article id 101543Article, review/survey (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Addressing the intertwined challenges of biodiversity loss and climate change requires rapid, intentional societal shifts. UNESCO Biosphere Reserves (BRs), established as interdisciplinary learning hubs for sustainable development, offer significant potential to bridge global commitments and local action. However, their effectiveness is hampered by structural, institutional, and perceptional/ideational challenges. This review identifies and categorizes these challenges, highlighting issues such as socioeconomic inequalities, governance constraints, and narrative complexities. Our analysis of 42 recent studies reveals that while BRs could serve as ‘living labs’ for transformative change, their impact is limited by these challenges. There are numerous indications that the development of BRs is at a critical juncture. If the identified challenges are not addressed, there is a risk that the role of BRs will be marginalized in the future, rather than evolving into key arenas that contribute to the transformative change we urgently need.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Elsevier, 2025. Vol. 75, article id 101543
National Category
Political Science (Excluding Peace and Conflict Studies) Environmental Sciences and Nature Conservation
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:umu:diva-240322DOI: 10.1016/j.cosust.2025.101543Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-105007644707OAI: oai:DiVA.org:umu-240322DiVA, id: diva2:1972881
Available from: 2025-06-19 Created: 2025-06-19 Last updated: 2025-06-19Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

fulltext(363 kB)24 downloads
File information
File name FULLTEXT01.pdfFile size 363 kBChecksum SHA-512
4aaa91e3d3647c1d63178997d62032cf5b8075e9c04f0e68732fa8a46e5be02110d9a89bec9928cd217eb332a0d0e9e5658dc57b1a3416e3810c974d3ebb67d5
Type fulltextMimetype application/pdf

Other links

Publisher's full textScopus

Authority records

Sandström, CamillaMancheva, Irina

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Sandström, CamillaMancheva, Irina
By organisation
Department of Political Science
In the same journal
Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability
Political Science (Excluding Peace and Conflict Studies)Environmental Sciences and Nature Conservation

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
Total: 24 downloads
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

doi
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
urn-nbn
Total: 99 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf