Umeå University's logo

umu.sePublications
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Collaboration on the optimal timing of anticoagulation after ischaemic stroke and atrial fibrillation: a systematic review and prospective individual participant data meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials (CATALYST)
Comprehensive Clinical Trials Unit, Institute of Clinical Trials and Methodology, University College London, London, United Kingdom.
Department of Neurology, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.
Department of Medical Sciences, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.
Dell Medical School, The University of Texas at Austin, Ascension Texas, TX, Austin, United States.
Show others and affiliations
2025 (English)In: The Lancet, ISSN 0140-6736, E-ISSN 1474-547X, Vol. 406, no 10498, p. 43-51Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Background: The optimal timing of oral anticoagulation for prevention of early ischaemic stroke recurrence in people with acute ischaemic stroke and atrial fibrillation remains uncertain. We aimed to estimate the effects of starting a direct oral anticoagulant (DOAC) early (≤4 days) versus later (≥5 days) after onset of ischaemic stroke.

Methods: For this systematic review and meta-analysis we searched the electronic databases PubMed, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and Embase for randomised controlled trials published from inception until March 16, 2025. We included clinical trials if they were pre-registered, randomised, investigated clinical outcomes, and included participants with acute ischaemic stroke and atrial fibrillation who were assigned to either early or later initiation (≤4 days vs ≥5 days) of a DOAC in approved doses. The primary outcome was a composite of recurrent ischaemic stroke, symptomatic intracerebral haemorrhage, or unclassified stroke within 30 days of randomisation. Secondary outcomes included components of the primary composite within 30 days and 90 days. We did a one-stage individual patient data meta-analysis with the use of a generalised linear mixed-effects model, accounting for between-trial differences, to generate treatment effects, which are presented as odds ratios (ORs) and 95% CIs. This study is registered with PROSPERO, CRD42024522634.

Findings: We identified four eligible trials: TIMING (NCT02961348), ELAN (NCT03148457), OPTIMAS (NCT03759938), and START (NCT03021928). After excluding participants who opted out of data sharing or were not randomly assigned to DOAC initiation within 4 days or at day 5 or later, we included 5441 participants (mean age 77·7 years [SD 10·0], 2472 [45·4%] women, median National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale 5 [IQR 3–10]) in the individual patient data meta-analysis. We obtained primary outcome data for 5429 participants. The primary outcome occurred in 57 (2·1%) of 2683 participants who started DOAC early versus 83 (3·0%) of 2746 participants who started later (OR 0·70, 95% CI 0·50–0·98, p=0·039). Early DOAC reduced the risk of recurrent ischaemic stroke (45 [1·7%] of 2683 vs 70 [2·6%] of 2746, OR 0·66, 0·45–0·96, p=0·029). There was no evidence of an increase in symptomatic intracerebral haemorrhage with early DOAC initiation (10 [0·4%] of 2683 vs 10 [0·4%] of 2746, OR 1·02, 0·43–2·46, p=0·96).

Interpretation: For people with acute ischaemic stroke and atrial fibrillation, early DOAC initiation (within 4 days) reduced the risk of the composite outcome of recurrent ischaemic stroke, symptomatic intracerebral haemorrhage, or unclassified stroke within 30 days. These findings support early DOAC initiation in clinical practice.

Funding: The CATALYST collaboration was facilitated by a British Heart Foundation grant for OPTIMAS (grant reference number CS/17/6/33361), with support from researchers at the National Institute for Health and Care Research University College London Hospitals Biomedical Research Centre, and a Swiss National Science Foundation grant for ELAN (32003B_197009; 32003B_169975).

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Elsevier, 2025. Vol. 406, no 10498, p. 43-51
National Category
Neurology Cardiology and Cardiovascular Disease
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:umu:diva-242111DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(25)00439-8Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-105009638918OAI: oai:DiVA.org:umu-242111DiVA, id: diva2:1983332
Available from: 2025-07-10 Created: 2025-07-10 Last updated: 2025-07-10Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

fulltext(634 kB)83 downloads
File information
File name FULLTEXT01.pdfFile size 634 kBChecksum SHA-512
3e2f561d968109bb9fda0815160215a5c4fb18da5f44fa6751229ec5f66660f54a5be30a6a2e5621e6db21fe396a91b0533e42247920a4c530b06659ae263c6a
Type fulltextMimetype application/pdf

Other links

Publisher's full textScopus

Authority records

Wester, Per

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Wester, Per
By organisation
Department of Public Health and Clinical Medicine
In the same journal
The Lancet
NeurologyCardiology and Cardiovascular Disease

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
Total: 85 downloads
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

doi
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
urn-nbn
Total: 437 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf