Protocol for development of a checklist and guideline for transparent reporting of cluster analyses (TRoCA) Department of Statistics and Actuarial Science, University of Waterloo, ON, Waterloo, Canada.
Department of Statistics, The University of British Columbia, BC, Vancouver, Canada.
Department of Psychiatry, Statistics and Biostatistics, University of Pittsburgh, PA, Pittsburgh, United States.
Unit for Data Science and Computing, North-West University, Potchefstroom, South Africa.
Department of Research in Biomedicine and Health, University of Split School of Medicine, Split, Croatia.
University of Canberra, ACT, Canberra, Australia.
Department of Computer Science, Universitat de València, Valencia, Spain.
Japan Advanced Institute of Science and Technology, Nomi, Japan.
Big Data Institute, Shenzhen University College of Computer Science and Software Engineering, Guangdong, Shenzhen, China.
Department of Statistical Sciences 'Paolo Fortunati', University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy.
Department of Psychometrics and Statistics, University of Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands.
GION Education/Research, Department of Pedagogical and Educational Sciences, University of Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands.
KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
Krefting Research Centre, Institute of Medicine, University of Gothenburg, Sahlgrenska Academy, Gothenburg, Sweden; University of Gothenburg, Wallenberg Centre for Molecular and Translational Medicine, Gothenburg, Sweden.
Department of Biomedical Data Science, Stanford University, CA, Stanford, United States.
Visa övriga samt affilieringar
2025 (Engelska) Ingår i: BMJ Open, E-ISSN 2044-6055, Vol. 15, nr 8, artikel-id e099609Artikel i tidskrift (Refereegranskat) Published
Abstract [en]
Introduction Cluster analysis, a machine learning-based and data-driven technique for identifying groups in data, has demonstrated its potential in a wide range of contexts. However, critical appraisal and reproducibility are often limited by insufficient reporting, ultimately hampering the interpretation and trust of key stakeholders. The present paper describes the protocol that will guide the development of a reporting guideline and checklist for studies incorporating cluster analyses - Transparent Reporting of Cluster Analyses. Methods and analysis Following the recommended steps for developing reporting guidelines outlined by the Enhancing the QUAlity and Transparency Of health Research Network, the work will be divided into six stages. Stage 1: literature review to guide development of initial checklist. Stage 2: drafting of the initial checklist. Stage 3: internal revision of checklist. Stage 4: Delphi study in a global sample of researchers from varying fields (n=≈) to derive consensus regarding items in the checklist and piloting of the checklist. Stage 5: consensus meeting to consolidate checklist. Stage 6: production of statement paper and explanation and elaboration paper. Stage 7: dissemination via journals, conferences, social media and a dedicated web platform. Ethics and dissemination Due to local regulations, the planned study is exempt from the requirement of ethical review. The findings will be disseminated through peer-reviewed publications. The checklist with explanations will also be made available freely on a dedicated web platform (troca-statement.org) and in a repository.
Ort, förlag, år, upplaga, sidor BMJ Publishing Group Ltd, 2025. Vol. 15, nr 8, artikel-id e099609
Nyckelord [en]
Health informatics, Information management, Information technology
Nationell ämneskategori
Datavetenskap (datalogi)
Identifikatorer URN: urn:nbn:se:umu:diva-243639 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2025-099609 Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-105013770031 OAI: oai:DiVA.org:umu-243639 DiVA, id: diva2:1993222
Forskningsfinansiär Hjärt-Lungfonden, 20200832 Hjärt-Lungfonden, 20220724 Vetenskapsrådet, 2019‐00247 2025-08-292025-08-292025-08-29 Bibliografiskt granskad