Umeå University's logo

umu.sePublications
System disruptions
There are recurring service disruptions on some of the search portals due to high traffic. We are working to resolve the issue, you may temporarily encounter an error message.
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Paclitaxel-coated versus uncoated devices for infrainguinal endovascular revascularisation in patients with intermittent claudication (SWEDEPAD 2): a multicentre, participant-masked, registry-based, randomised controlled trial
Department of Molecular and Clinical Medicine, Institute of Medicine, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden.
Department of Medical Sciences, Cardiology, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden; Uppsala Clinical Research Center, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.
Department of Biomedical and Clinical Sciences, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden; Department of Surgery, County Hospital Ryhov, Jönköping, Sweden.
Department of Molecular and Clinical Medicine, Institute of Medicine, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden; Department of Surgery, Sunderbyn Hospital, Sunderbyn, Sweden.
Show others and affiliations
2025 (English)In: The Lancet, ISSN 0140-6736, E-ISSN 1474-547X, Vol. 406, no 10508, p. 1115-1127Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Background: Drug-coated devices are widely used to reduce restenosis after lower limb revascularisation in patients with peripheral artery disease, but their effect on patient-centred outcomes remains unclear. We assessed the effect of paclitaxel-coated devices on clinically important outcomes in patients with intermittent claudication undergoing infrainguinal endovascular revascularisation.

Methods: The Swedish Drug-Elution Trial in Peripheral Arterial Disease 2 (SWEDEPAD 2) was a pragmatic, nationwide, multicentre, participant-masked, registry-based, randomised controlled trial conducted at 22 Swedish vascular centres. Adults 18 years or older with intermittent claudication (Rutherford categories 1–3) undergoing infrainguinal endovascular treatment and with no acute thromboembolic disease of the lower limb or infrainguinal aneurysmal disease were eligible for inclusion. Participants were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio after successful guidewire crossing to receive either paclitaxel-coated devices or uncoated balloons or stents. Randomisation was stratified by centre and performed using a computer-generated sequence with allocation concealment via a secure, registry-embedded web system. The primary efficacy endpoint was the between-group difference in quality of life at 1 year, assessed with the six-item Vascular Quality of Life Questionnaire (VascuQoL-6), a peripheral artery disease-specific quality of life instrument. The trial is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT02051088) and the primary analysis is complete; further analyses are ongoing.

Findings: Between Nov 5, 2014, and Sept 27, 2023, a total of 1155 patients were enrolled and randomly assigned across 22 vascular centres in Sweden, of whom 1136 (98·3%) had follow-up data available for analysis. 577 patients were randomly assigned to paclitaxel-coated devices and 578 to uncoated devices, of whom 565 (97·9%) and 571 (98·7%) were included in the intention-to-treat population, respectively. The median age in the analysed cohort was 73·0 years (IQR 68·0–78·0). Of the 1136 patients, 612 (53·9%) were male and 524 (46·1%) were female; and 382 (33·7%) of 1135 had preoperative diabetes (one participant in the paclitaxel-coated device group was missing data). Most patients (677 [59·6%] of 1135) presented with severe claudication (Rutherford category 3). Femoropopliteal interventions were performed in 1092 patients (96·1%). At 1 year, VascuQoL-6 scores did not differ between groups (mean difference –0·02 [95% CI –0·66 to 0·62]; p=0·96). All-cause mortality did not differ over a median 7·1 years (IQR 3·9–8·2); hazard ratio (HR) 1·18 (95% CI 0·94–1·48); p=0·16, although 5-year mortality incidence was higher in patients randomly assigned to the paclitaxel-coated devices group (4·57 vs 3·28 per 100 person-years; HR 1·47 [95% CI 1·09–1·98]; p=0·010).

Interpretation: In patients with Rutherford stage 1–3 peripheral artery disease undergoing infrainguinal endovascular revascularisation, paclitaxel-coated devices did not improve disease-specific quality of life at 1 year compared with uncoated devices. All-cause mortality was not different over the total follow-up time, but significantly higher over 5 years. These findings do not support routine use of paclitaxel-coated devices in this patient population.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Elsevier, 2025. Vol. 406, no 10508, p. 1115-1127
National Category
Surgery Cardiology and Cardiovascular Disease
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:umu:diva-243969DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(25)01584-3ISI: 001575231200007PubMedID: 40902614Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-105014755351OAI: oai:DiVA.org:umu-243969DiVA, id: diva2:1995865
Funder
Swedish Research CouncilSwedish Heart Lung FoundationAvailable from: 2025-09-08 Created: 2025-09-08 Last updated: 2025-11-28Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Other links

Publisher's full textPubMedScopus
By organisation
Department of Radiation Sciences
In the same journal
The Lancet
SurgeryCardiology and Cardiovascular Disease

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn
Total: 88 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf