Umeå University's logo

umu.sePublications
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Thermal runaway induced battery recycling
Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Thermal Management Engineering & Materials, Tsinghua Shenzhen International Graduate School, Tsinghua University, Shenzhen, China.
Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Thermal Management Engineering & Materials, Tsinghua Shenzhen International Graduate School, Tsinghua University, Shenzhen, China.
Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Thermal Management Engineering & Materials, Tsinghua Shenzhen International Graduate School, Tsinghua University, Shenzhen, China.
Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Thermal Management Engineering & Materials, Tsinghua Shenzhen International Graduate School, Tsinghua University, Shenzhen, China.
Show others and affiliations
2025 (English)In: Advanced Energy Materials, ISSN 1614-6832, E-ISSN 1614-6840, Vol. 15, no 44, article id e03381Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Elemental extraction from spent lithium-ion batteries (LIBs) is considered the most mature and inevitable recycling route. However, industrial hydrometallurgy (Hydro) and pyrometallurgy (Pyro) strategies necessitate complex processes with high energy and chemical consumption, leading to significant environmental impacts and reduced profitability. Here, a strategy for low-consumption recycling of spent LIBs using the batteries’ intrinsic energy through thermal runaway is presented. Direct thermal runaway heats the battery to promote cathode thermal reduction, thereby changing the thermodynamics and sluggish kinetics of element extraction. Taking LiMn0.64Ni0.29Co0.07O2 batteries as an example, thermal runaway battery recycling can save at least 37.9% and 55.7%, respectively, in energy and chemical consumption compared to Pyro and Hydro, and can reduce greenhouse gas emissions by 54.6% and 44.5%, respectively. This results in a profit of 1.94 $ kg−1 battery, which is comparatively higher than the 1.14 $ kg−1 for Hydro and 0.79 $ kg−1 for Pyro recovery strategies.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
John Wiley & Sons, 2025. Vol. 15, no 44, article id e03381
Keywords [en]
battery recycling, element extraction, spent lithium ion batteries, thermal runaway
National Category
Energy Engineering Materials Chemistry
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:umu:diva-244987DOI: 10.1002/aenm.202503381ISI: 001575912200001Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-105017161176OAI: oai:DiVA.org:umu-244987DiVA, id: diva2:2004027
Available from: 2025-10-06 Created: 2025-10-06 Last updated: 2025-12-12Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Other links

Publisher's full textScopus

Authority records

Tavajohi Hassan Kiadeh, Naser

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Tavajohi Hassan Kiadeh, Naser
By organisation
Department of Chemistry
In the same journal
Advanced Energy Materials
Energy EngineeringMaterials Chemistry

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
urn-nbn
Total: 67 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf