Umeå University's logo

umu.sePublications
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Implementing evidence-based psychiatric rehabilitation services in rural areas: development and testing of a research practice collaboration
Umeå University, Faculty of Social Sciences, Department of Social Work.ORCID iD: 0000-0001-8802-133X
Umeå University, Faculty of Social Sciences, Department of Social Work.ORCID iD: 0000-0002-6330-5640
Umeå University, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Epidemiology and Global Health.ORCID iD: 0000-0002-5517-0803
Umeå University, Faculty of Social Sciences, Department of Social Work.ORCID iD: 0000-0002-0790-9386
2025 (English)Conference paper, Oral presentation only (Refereed)
Abstract [en]

Background: Rural communities face specific challenges when implementing evidence-based practices (EBPs) due to their size, remoteness from knowledge centers, and broad responsibility for the local population. Studies indicate that these challenges can negatively impact the development of best practice for individuals with serious mental illnesses.

Purpose: The aim of this study was to investigate the utilization of an RPC (Research Practice Collaboration) initiative as a strategy for translation and implementation of psychiatric rehabilitation methods in rural municipalities.

Method:  With the starting point in form of a seminar where the updated National Psychiatry Guidelines were presented, four rural municipalities from the north of Sweden engaged in an RPC process, focusing on implementing specific recovery-oriented EBPs, including Individual Placement and Support and Shared Decision-Making.

Results: In addition to confirming challenges in rural areas, the RPC process helped the participants to understand the relevance of these practices to their own conditions and ambitions for individuals experiencing mental health problems. The municipalities were able to build on their already existing strengths and achieve incremental steps towards providing improved services.

Conclusions: The collaborative nature of the RPC structure, requiring locally relevant, tailored implementation strategies, while considering essential method components in relation to local conditions, led to increased readiness to implement these practices. Research practice collaborations may contribute to the implementation of methods based on best practice in rural areas by increasing their accessibility and relevance in these challenging conditions.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2025.
National Category
Social Sciences Social Work
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:umu:diva-245653OAI: oai:DiVA.org:umu-245653DiVA, id: diva2:2007006
Conference
WAPR2025, XV World Congress of World Association For Psychosocial Rehabilitation (WAPR) & the Canadian PSR Recovery Conference, Vancouver, Canada, September 27-30, 2025
Part of project
Implementation of evidence-based practice in rural Sweden - Exploring innovative strategies for realization of national guidelines for treatment and support for people with schizophrenia, Forte, Swedish Research Council for Health, Working Life and WelfareAvailable from: 2025-10-16 Created: 2025-10-16 Last updated: 2025-10-17Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Authority records

Bergmark, MagnusMarkström, UrbanRichter Sundberg, LindaRosenberg, David

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Bergmark, MagnusMarkström, UrbanRichter Sundberg, LindaRosenberg, David
By organisation
Department of Social WorkDepartment of Epidemiology and Global Health
Social SciencesSocial Work

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

urn-nbn

Altmetric score

urn-nbn
Total: 87 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf