Pathological response to pembrolizumab-based neoadjuvant therapy in ER-low vs. ER-zero breast cancer: a Swedish population-based cohort studyDepartment of Clinical Pathology, Uppsala University Hospital, Uppsala, Sweden; Department of Immunology, Genetics and Pathology, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.
Department of Pathology, Kalmar County Hospital, Region Kalmar, Kalmar, Sweden; Department of Clinical Sciences Lund, Division of Pathology, Lund University, Lund, Sweden.
Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, Region Jönköping County Hospital, Jönköping, Sweden.
Department of Clinical Pathology, Department of Biomedical and Clinical Sciences, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden; Centre for Medical Image Science and Visualization, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden.
Department of Pathology and Cytology Dalarna, County Hospital Dalarna, Falun, Sweden.
Department of Laboratory Medicine, Örebro University Hospital, Örebro, Sweden.
Department of Pathology, Växjö Central Hospital, Region Kronoberg, Sweden.
Department of Oncology-Pathology, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden; Breast Center, Theme Cancer, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden.
Department of Oncology-Pathology, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden; Breast Center, Theme Cancer, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden.
Department of Oncology-Pathology, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden; Breast Center, Theme Cancer, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden.
Department of Molecular Medicine and Surgery, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden; Department of Breast, Endocrine Tumors and Sarcoma, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden; Department of Medical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Department of Medical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Department of Oncology-Pathology, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden; Department of Clinical and Surgical Pathology, Unilabs, Stockholm, Sweden.
Department of Clinical Pathology, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Gothenburg, Sweden; Institute of Biomedicine, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden.
Department of Oncology-Pathology, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden; Department of Clinical Pathology and Cancer Diagnostics, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden; MedTechLabs, Karolinska University Hospital, BioClinicum NKS J5:20, Solnavägen 30, Bioclinicum, Solna, Sweden.
Department of Oncology-Pathology, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden; Department of Clinical Pathology and Cancer Diagnostics, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden; MedTechLabs, Karolinska University Hospital, BioClinicum NKS J5:20, Solnavägen 30, Bioclinicum, Solna, Sweden.
Show others and affiliations
2025 (English)In: Breast Cancer Research, ISSN 1465-5411, E-ISSN 1465-542X, Vol. 27, article id 213Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]
Background: Emerging evidence indicates that estrogen receptor-low (ER-low)/human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 negative (HER2-) breast cancer (BC) may more closely resemble ER-negative (ER-zero, < 1%) rather than ER-positive disease in terms of biological and clinicopathological characteristics. In Sweden, ER-low (ER 1–9%) BC is managed as triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) and is thus eligible for neoadjuvant chemo-immunotherapy. We aimed to investigate real-world pathological response to neoadjuvant pembrolizumab combined with chemotherapy in ER-low versus ER-zero BC patients within a Swedish population-based multi-center cohort.
Methods: BC patients with indication to receive neoadjuvant pembrolizumab in combination with chemotherapy in Sweden between 2022 and 2024 were included in the study. Clinicopathological data—including pathological complete response (pCR) status, residual cancer burden (RCB) score, stromal tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (sTILs) levels, and routine tumor characteristics—were retrieved from laboratory information systems. Associations between categorical variables were assessed using chi-squared (χ2) tests and associations between continuous variables and ER status or pCR were analyzed using Mann–Whitney U-test.
Results: The total cohort comprised 441 TNBC cases (ER-zero n = 398; ER-low n = 43). In the ER-zero group, the pCR rate and RCB score 0–1 were 50.5% (95% CI: 45.5% to 55.5%) and 60.8% (95% CI: 55.8% to 65.6%), respectively. In the ER-low group, the corresponding values were 58.1% (95% CI: 42.1% to 73%), and 60.5% (95% CI: 44.4% to 75%), respectively. There were no statistically significant differences in either pCR rate (p = 0.46) or dichotomized RCB score (p = 0.88) between the groups. The ER-low group showed significantly higher sTILs percentage compared to the ER-zero group (median sTILs 25% versus 20%, p = 0.046). However, when sTILs were analyzed as a binary categorical variable using a 30% cut-off, no significant difference was observed (p = 0.33).
Conclusions: We observed no significant difference in pathological response to neoadjuvant chemo-immunotherapy with pembrolizumab between ER-zero and ER-low BCs. These findings support previous evidence suggesting that ER-low tumors behave more similarly to ER-zero than ER-positive.
Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Springer Nature, 2025. Vol. 27, article id 213
Keywords [en]
ER low, Neoadjuvant immunotherapy, Pembrolizumab, Triple negative breast cancer
National Category
Cancer and Oncology
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:umu:diva-247736DOI: 10.1186/s13058-025-02179-3PubMedID: 41316480Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-105023453427OAI: oai:DiVA.org:umu-247736DiVA, id: diva2:2022555
2025-12-172025-12-172025-12-17Bibliographically approved