Umeå University's logo

umu.sePublications
Operational message
There are currently operational disruptions. Troubleshooting is in progress.
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Surgical tips of right posterior superior mesenteric artery approach for pancreatoduodenectomy
Umeå University, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Diagnostics and Intervention. Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, Institute of Science Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan.
Umeå University, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Diagnostics and Intervention. Department of Surgery, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy.
Umeå University, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Diagnostics and Intervention.
Umeå University, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Diagnostics and Intervention.
Show others and affiliations
2025 (English)In: Journal of Visualized Experiments, E-ISSN 1940-087X, Vol. 225, article id e69054Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Pancreatoduodenectomy (PD) is a complex operation, particularly when tumors involve major vessels, including the portal vein and superior mesenteric vein (SMV) or major arteries. To achieve radical surgery, venous resection is often required, and with advancements in neoadjuvant therapy, aggressive surgical approaches, including arterial divestment and resection, are becoming more common. Ideally, a standardized technique should be applied for resectable tumors. In our institution, the right posterior superior mesenteric artery (SMA) approach is routinely performed. This study presents the details of the right posterior SMA approach. The protocol outlines the patient selection criteria, surgical positioning, and step-by-step technical procedures. The right posterior SMA approach begins with exposing the SMV, followed by dissection of the peripancreatic plexus (PLph II) posteriorly from a caudal direction. After anterior dissection of the SMV groove and PLphI, the specimen is removed. This technique enables a clear anatomical boundary, facilitating better visualization and safer resection. Standardizing this approach might enhance oncological outcomes, improve surgical reproducibility, and reduce intraoperative bleeding.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
MyJoVE Corporation , 2025. Vol. 225, article id e69054
National Category
Surgery
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:umu:diva-247590DOI: 10.3791/69054ISI: 001634923100011Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-105024193206OAI: oai:DiVA.org:umu-247590DiVA, id: diva2:2023129
Available from: 2025-12-18 Created: 2025-12-18 Last updated: 2025-12-18Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Other links

Publisher's full textScopus

Authority records

Yoshino, JunScandavini, Chiara M.Sotirova, IraGkekas, IoannisValente, RobertoFranklin, OskarHalimi, Asif

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Yoshino, JunScandavini, Chiara M.Sotirova, IraGkekas, IoannisValente, RobertoFranklin, OskarHalimi, Asif
By organisation
Department of Diagnostics and Intervention
In the same journal
Journal of Visualized Experiments
Surgery

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
urn-nbn
Total: 26 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf