Umeå University's logo

umu.sePublications
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Asymmetric hearing across varying hearing levels and its impact on rehabilitation in severe-to-profound hearing loss
Faculty of Medicine and Health, Medicine and Health, Örebro University; Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Central Hospital, Karlstad, Sweden.
Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Central Hospital, Karlstad, Sweden.
Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Central Hospital, Karlstad, Sweden.
Umeå University, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Clinical Sciences, Otorhinolaryngology.ORCID iD: 0000-0003-0933-7892
Show others and affiliations
2026 (English)In: Otology and Neurotology, ISSN 1531-7129, E-ISSN 1537-4505, Vol. 47, no 1, p. 40-44Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

OBJECTIVE: Comparison of asymmetric hearing in patients with severe-to-profound hearing loss (STPHL) and those with less pronounced or no hearing loss. The influence of asymmetric hearing on cochlear implantation (CI) was also analyzed.

STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective cohort.

SETTING: Hearing clinics across all regions in Sweden.

PATIENTS: This study included 898,421 adult patients identified using the audiometric software Auditbase and 4286 adult patients from the Swedish National Quality Register for STPHL.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Proportion of patients with asymmetric hearing according to 11 different asymmetry criteria. Adjusted odds ratios for the presence of cochlear implants, adjusted for age, sex, and the highest level of education.

RESULTS: Across the different criteria, asymmetric hearing ranged from 20% to 59% in STPHL patients and 14% to 46% in those with better hearing. Adjusted odds ratios showed that cochlear implants were more common in patients with >15 dB asymmetry in the pure tone average at the base and mid-range frequencies.

CONCLUSION: This study of national audiogram data from Sweden showed that asymmetric hearing was more common in patients with STPHL. The higher proportion of CI in patients with asymmetric hearing indicates that asymmetric hearing is a complicating factor that must be considered in the rehabilitation of STPHL.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Wolters Kluwer, 2026. Vol. 47, no 1, p. 40-44
Keywords [en]
Asymmetric hearing, Audiological rehabilitation, Cochlear implant, Hearing loss
National Category
Oto-rhino-laryngology
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:umu:diva-247907DOI: 10.1097/MAO.0000000000004714ISI: 001636234200026PubMedID: 41191416Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-105024733386OAI: oai:DiVA.org:umu-247907DiVA, id: diva2:2025933
Available from: 2026-01-08 Created: 2026-01-08 Last updated: 2026-01-08Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Other links

Publisher's full textPubMedScopus

Authority records

Westman, Eva

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Westman, Eva
By organisation
Otorhinolaryngology
In the same journal
Otology and Neurotology
Oto-rhino-laryngology

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn
Total: 17 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf