Umeå University's logo

umu.sePublications
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
From cognitive coherence to political polarization: a data-driven agent-based model of belief change
Royal Holloway, University of London, Egham, United Kingdom.
Complexity Science Hub, Vienna, Austria; Constructor University, Bremen, Germany.
Constructor University, Bremen, Germany.
Umeå University, Faculty of Science and Technology, Department of Computing Science. Centre for Policy Modelling, United Kingdom; UiT Norway University of the Arctic, Tromsø, Norway.
Show others and affiliations
2025 (English)In: Political Psychology, ISSN 0162-895X, E-ISSN 1467-9221Article in journal (Refereed) Epub ahead of print
Abstract [en]

Political polarization represents a rising issue in many countries, making it more and more important to understand its relation to cognitive-motivational and social influence mechanisms. Yet, the link between micro-level mechanisms and macro-level phenomena remains unclear. We investigated the consequences of individuals striving for cognitive coherence in their belief systems on political polarization in society in an agent-based model. In this, we formalized how cognitive coherence affects how individuals update their beliefs following social influence and self-reflection processes. We derive agents' political beliefs as well as their subjective belief systems, defining what determines coherence for different individuals, from European Social Survey data via correlational class analysis. The simulation shows that agents polarize in their beliefs when they have a strong strive for cognitive coherence, and especially when they have structurally different belief systems. In a mathematical analysis, we not only explain the main findings but also underscore the necessity of simulations for understanding the complex dynamics of socially embedded phenomena such as political polarization.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
John Wiley & Sons, 2025.
Keywords [en]
agent-based simulation, belief change, belief systems, cognitive coherence, political polarization
National Category
Psychology (Excluding Applied Psychology) Political Science (Excluding Peace and Conflict Studies) Probability Theory and Statistics
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:umu:diva-248196DOI: 10.1111/pops.70099ISI: 001642356500001Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-105025355450OAI: oai:DiVA.org:umu-248196DiVA, id: diva2:2027267
Funder
EU, European Research Council, 101140741European Social Fund (ESF), ES/S015159/1German Research Foundation (DFG), 396901899Available from: 2026-01-12 Created: 2026-01-12 Last updated: 2026-01-12

Open Access in DiVA

fulltext(2403 kB)99 downloads
File information
File name FULLTEXT01.pdfFile size 2403 kBChecksum SHA-512
68d5bf574e5243ca3cf9b211c6fb623dd926bcf3d194312b6df099697dcf270a8916b772acc3ca86ffca92ceda9d53e0b4ea014a8d079b4da9ee1a39bc10dc2f
Type fulltextMimetype application/pdf

Other links

Publisher's full textScopus

Authority records

Edmonds, Bruce

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Edmonds, Bruce
By organisation
Department of Computing Science
In the same journal
Political Psychology
Psychology (Excluding Applied Psychology)Political Science (Excluding Peace and Conflict Studies)Probability Theory and Statistics

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

doi
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
urn-nbn
Total: 815 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf