Umeå University's logo

umu.sePublications
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Sample size estimation for local hypothesis testing of functional data in medical studies: method comparison, recommendations, and a web application
Umeå University, Faculty of Social Sciences, Umeå School of Business and Economics (USBE), Statistics.ORCID iD: 0009-0002-3278-5554
Umeå University, Faculty of Social Sciences, Umeå School of Business and Economics (USBE), Statistics.ORCID iD: 0000-0003-1098-0076
Department of Human Health Sciences, Kyoto University Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto, Japan.ORCID iD: 0000-0002-8292-7189
Umeå University, Faculty of Social Sciences, Umeå School of Business and Economics (USBE), Statistics.ORCID iD: 0000-0001-7917-5687
2026 (English)In: BMC Medical Research Methodology, E-ISSN 1471-2288, Vol. 26, no 1, article id 19Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Background  Recent medical studies have shown an increasing interest in inferential methods for analysing functional data, while statistical power analysis for sample size planning for such data is less explored. As a result, researchers often rely on classical scalar approaches to estimate sample size, despite working with functional data. This can substantially underestimate the required sample sizes. Moreover, there are no guidelines to assist researchers in planning, conducting, and reporting sample size estimation for studies analysing functional data.

Methods  Two functional data sets from medical sciences are used in a simulation study to explore a functional approach for sample size planning. These data represent two distinct patterns in mean function differences. Six wellknown local inferential methods are evaluated for two-population comparisons of functional data. The evaluation focuses on the sample sizes required to achieve the target statistical power, under different data characteristics and assuming equal group sizes and stationary noise in the data generation process. We have also developed an interactive web-based application that helps researchers in performing a priori power analysis by allowing them to explore how changes in data characteristics affect statistical power, and consequently, the required sample size.

Results  Our comparison revealed distinct patterns in the estimated sample sizes for different data characteristics and inferential methods. Even when based on the same baseline data, the required sample sizes to achieve a target statistical power of 0.80 differed noticeably, ranging from very small to moderately large sample sizes, depending on the mean function pattern, underlying noise characteristics, and inferential approach.

Conclusions  Overall, our results emphasise the importance of appropriate sample size planning and inferential method selection for valid inference in medical studies that include functional data analysis. Based on these findings, we provide guidance for researchers to follow, from study design conception through to reporting.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
BioMed Central (BMC), 2026. Vol. 26, no 1, article id 19
Keywords [en]
Functional data analysis, Hypothesis test, Power analysis, Sample size, Statistical power
National Category
Probability Theory and Statistics
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:umu:diva-249195DOI: 10.1186/s12874-026-02772-wISI: 001675834500001PubMedID: 41572178Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-105029019923OAI: oai:DiVA.org:umu-249195DiVA, id: diva2:2033669
Available from: 2026-01-29 Created: 2026-01-29 Last updated: 2026-02-12Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

fulltext(4804 kB)33 downloads
File information
File name FULLTEXT01.pdfFile size 4804 kBChecksum SHA-512
2d4a1852933d44449253745e19be2a3f3b6f516ba9950c25fcb4a98a5dc92b8c42b3f2bd3319fbfb3d94c7364fcabf5c5cd59524aa8aeb8bfb50a26e6c7a7a29
Type fulltextMimetype application/pdf

Other links

Publisher's full textPubMedScopus

Authority records

Seydi, Mohammad RezaStrandberg, JohanSchelin, Lina

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Seydi, Mohammad RezaStrandberg, JohanPataky, Todd C.Schelin, Lina
By organisation
Statistics
In the same journal
BMC Medical Research Methodology
Probability Theory and Statistics

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn
Total: 3305 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf