Umeå University's logo

umu.sePublications
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Exploring effects of resilience-focused debriefing on reflection and teamwork in interprofessional simulation-based education: a mixed method study
Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Institute of Clinical Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden; Simulation Centre, Department of Research, Development, Education and Innovation, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Region Västra Götaland, Diagnosvägen 10, Gothenburg, Sweden.
Simulation Centre, Department of Research, Development, Education and Innovation, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Region Västra Götaland, Diagnosvägen 10, Gothenburg, Sweden.
Institute of Health and Care Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden.
Copenhagen Academy for Medical Education and Simulation (CAMES), Center for Human Resources, Capital Region of Denmark, Herlev Hospital, Herlev, Denmark; Department of Quality and Health Technology, University of Stavanger, Stavanger, Norway; Department of Public Health, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Show others and affiliations
2026 (English)In: Advances in Science and Technology Research Journal, ISSN 2364-3277, E-ISSN 2059-0628, Vol. 11, no 1, article id 4Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Background: Interprofessional simulation-based education (IPSE) holds the potential to prepare healthcare students to handle the complexity of healthcare. However, complexity and resilience are traditionally not addressed deliberately in IPSE. The aim of this study was to explore the effect of resilience-focused debriefing (RFD) that addresses complexity and resilience, on reflection and teamwork in IPSE for pre-graduate healthcare students.

Methods: In a convergent mixed methods intervention study, 149 nursing and medical students in their last semester participated in a full-day IPSE course with five progressively challenging scenarios. Fifteen facilitators were instructed to use RFD. Qualitative date, comprised of transcripts from nine debriefings, were analysed using topic analysis. An intervention check was performed to assess the use of RFD. Quantitative data comprised pre-post ratings of team performance in videorecorded scenarios (1 and 5) from 18 groups using the Team Emergency Assessment Measure (TEAM). Additionally, a study-specific rating scale was employed to assess the extent of participants’ perceived challenges during scenarios.

Results: RFD helped facilitators to guide the students’ attention to the complexity of teamwork and how to manage such complex situations successfully by adapting crisis resource management principles and performing resilient actions (e.g., attunement, adaptive leadership), both as individuals and as teams. Applying RFD brought the students’ attention to how they were able to succeed despite the difficulties they encountered. Although the assessed team performance was on an acceptable level, students initially had difficulties in recognizing and learning from actions that led to successful outcomes. The significant decrease in the degree of challenges experienced suggests that students developed a greater tolerance for complexity. Nevertheless, the quantitative data showed that there was no pre-post difference in team performance as assessed by TEAM.

Conclusions: RFD can be used to increase healthcare students’ attention to the complexity of interprofessional teamwork in acute dynamic situations and help them recognize and learn from both successful actions and overcoming challenging situations. Although we did not find a significant gain in team performance, the integrated results suggest that RFD may potentially improve interprofessional teamwork. Further research is warranted to develop instruments measuring team performance that are sensitive to various aspects of resilience, as well as to deepen the understanding of RFD in the simulation-based education.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
BioMed Central (BMC), 2026. Vol. 11, no 1, article id 4
Keywords [en]
Complexity, Debriefing, Interprofessional education, Learning from success, Patient safety, Patient simulation, Resilient healthcare, Safety II, Team performance
National Category
Pedagogy Didactics
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:umu:diva-249438DOI: 10.1186/s41077-025-00398-4ISI: 001667930500001PubMedID: 41419993Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-105028497026OAI: oai:DiVA.org:umu-249438DiVA, id: diva2:2037345
Funder
Marcus and Amalia Wallenberg FoundationAvailable from: 2026-02-10 Created: 2026-02-10 Last updated: 2026-02-10Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

fulltext(2018 kB)39 downloads
File information
File name FULLTEXT01.pdfFile size 2018 kBChecksum SHA-512
b53c535760eef5a0a9f6c5aedf8a612c36759cc6101cd5e1200d843d3fa395bb9655defa32e7e37896da4bd5edba637c58cbf8a0df689c3b1eafa5c40891a563
Type fulltextMimetype application/pdf

Other links

Publisher's full textPubMedScopus

Authority records

Jonsson, Karin

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Jonsson, Karin
By organisation
Department of Nursing
In the same journal
Advances in Science and Technology Research Journal
PedagogyDidactics

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn
Total: 3959 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf