Umeå University's logo

umu.sePublications
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Relaxivity of gadobutrol and gadoteric acid in cerebrospinal fluid at 3T
Umeå University, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Diagnostics and Intervention.ORCID iD: 0000-0002-7712-5907
Umeå University, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Diagnostics and Intervention.ORCID iD: 0000-0002-0532-232X
Umeå University, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Diagnostics and Intervention.ORCID iD: 0009-0003-3509-2523
Umeå University, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Clinical Sciences, Neurosciences.ORCID iD: 0000-0001-6451-1940
Show others and affiliations
2026 (English)In: Magnetic Resonance in Medicine, ISSN 0740-3194, E-ISSN 1522-2594, Vol. 95, no 6, p. 3409-3415Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Purpose: The aim was to estimate T1 relaxivity of gadobutrol and gadoteric acid in cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) at 3T, to support research on CSF-flow and the glymphatic system in humans utilizing T1 mapping after intrathecal injection.

Methods: Using a phantom, relaxivity was estimated for gadobutrol and gadoteric acid in lumbar CSF and an isotonic solution. All samples were scanned simultaneously using the variable flip angle method with B1 correction, repeated six times on one 3T scanner, and once on a second 3T scanner. Difference in relaxivity between CSF and the isotonic solution were evaluated from the repeated measurements.

Results: There was a significant difference in relaxivity between CSF and the isotonic solution for both gadobutrol and gadoteric acid. The relaxivity for gadobutrol for the respective scanners was estimated to 3.02 ± 0.09 vs. 3.63 L mmol−1 s−1 in CSF and 2.35 ± 0.05 vs. 2.74 L mmol−1 s−1 in isotonic solution. For gadoteric acid, corresponding results were 2.47 ± 0.02 vs. 2.91 L mmol−1 s−1 in CSF and 2.37 ± 0.03 vs. 2.8 L mmol−1 s−1 in isotonic solution. Between the scanners, there was a high correlation (R2 0.998) but an 18% scaling difference in the T1 relaxation rates and corresponding relaxivities.

Conclusions: The relaxivity was higher in CSF than in the isotonic solution, particularly for gadobutrol. Systematic differences in relaxivity between scanners may potentially be corrected using a scaling factor derived from the T1 time of baseline CSF. For CSF studies using T1 mapping with a gadolinium-based contrast agent, we recommend using a CSF-specific relaxivity constant.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
John Wiley & Sons, 2026. Vol. 95, no 6, p. 3409-3415
Keywords [en]
cerebrospinal fluid, MRI contrast media, phantom, relaxivity, T1 mapping
National Category
Analytical Chemistry
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:umu:diva-249654DOI: 10.1002/mrm.70284ISI: 001675566300001PubMedID: 41621851Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-105029059035OAI: oai:DiVA.org:umu-249654DiVA, id: diva2:2038854
Funder
Swedish Research Council, 2021-0071Swedish Foundation for Strategic Research, RMX18-0152Available from: 2026-02-16 Created: 2026-02-16 Last updated: 2026-05-21Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

fulltext(1392 kB)2 downloads
File information
File name FULLTEXT02.pdfFile size 1392 kBChecksum SHA-512
01962165382f22d15324f6e24361b82e1d9a4dfcb4f129b85350e6a4a36c379fb1439a749aed44e43ec6788804af1b870b4f2d5f3b552409cff27188b4278e2e
Type fulltextMimetype application/pdf

Other links

Publisher's full textPubMedScopus

Authority records

Behndig, SofiaGarpebring, AndersMalm, JanWåhlin, AndersEklund, Anders

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Behndig, SofiaGarpebring, AndersDahlgren Lindström, DanielMalm, JanWåhlin, AndersEklund, Anders
By organisation
Department of Diagnostics and InterventionNeurosciencesUmeå Centre for Functional Brain Imaging (UFBI)Department of Applied Physics and Electronics
In the same journal
Magnetic Resonance in Medicine
Analytical Chemistry

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
Total: 39 downloads
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn
Total: 3248 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf