Associations between inclusivity norms and tolerance, contact, and cooperation amid polarization: evidence from 12 European countries Department of Social and Cultural Anthropology, Autonomous University of Barcelona, Bellaterra, Spain.
Department of Psychology, University of Osnabrück, Osnabrück, Germany.
Maastricht Sustainability Institute, Maastricht University, Maastricht, Netherlands.
Interdisciplinary Centre for Mathematical and Computational Modelling, University of Warsaw, Warszawa, Poland.
Institute of Psychology, Jagiellonian University, Kraków, Poland; Department of Social Psychology, University of Granada, Granada, Spain.
Department of Psychology, University of Osnabrück, Osnabrück, Germany.
Department of Sociology, Utrecht University, Utrecht, Netherlands.
Faculty of Psychology, FernUniversität in Hagen, Hagen, Germany.
Institute of Psychology, Jagiellonian University, Kraków, Poland.
Department of Psychology, University of Osnabrück, Osnabrück, Germany.
Faculty of Psychology, FernUniversität in Hagen, Hagen, Germany.
Faculty of Psychology, FernUniversität in Hagen, Hagen, Germany.
Institute of Psychology, Academy of Sciences of the Czech Republic, Brno, Czech Republic.
Department of Sociology, Utrecht University, Utrecht, Netherlands.
Faculty of Social Sciences, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland.
Institute of Psychology, ELTE Eötvös Loránd University, Budapest, Hungary.
Department of Psychology, University of Crete, Rethymno, Greece.
Department of Psychology, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy.
Faculty of Psychology, FernUniversität in Hagen, Hagen, Germany.
Visa övriga samt affilieringar
2026 (Engelska) Ingår i: PNAS Nexus, E-ISSN 2752-6542, Vol. 5, nr 4, artikel-id pgag087Artikel i tidskrift (Refereegranskat) Published
Abstract [en]
Sharp disagreements about social issues have raised concerns about increasing societal polarization in democracies worldwide. While diversity of opinion is vital for democratic engagement and can promote innovative solutions, social science research shows that such disagreements can undermine social cohesion and erode social trust if they turn into identity-based conflicts. The present research examines the potential importance of social norms that promote equality-based respect, dialogue, and unity (inclusivity norms) in mitigating these negative outcomes. In a preregistered, large-scale survey of 12,041 individuals in 12 European countries, we find that perceived inclusivity norms are associated with increased tolerance, greater willingness to collaborate, and lower tendencies to avoid people who hold opposing opinions. In most countries studied, this pattern holds among respondents who strongly disapprove of the opposing viewpoint, endorse antipluralist opinions, hold anti-egalitarian preferences, and identify more strongly with their opinion-based group relative to society. These findings support the potential of inclusivity norms to preserve social trust and cohesion amid opinion diversity.
Ort, förlag, år, upplaga, sidor Oxford University Press, 2026. Vol. 5, nr 4, artikel-id pgag087
Nyckelord [en]
intergroup relations, polarization, social norms
Nationell ämneskategori
Sociologi (Exklusive socialt arbete, socialantropologi, demografi och kriminologi)
Identifikatorer URN: urn:nbn:se:umu:diva-252235 DOI: 10.1093/pnasnexus/pgag087 ISI: 001737090800001 PubMedID: 41969568 Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-105035700106 OAI: oai:DiVA.org:umu-252235 DiVA, id: diva2:2054855
2026-04-222026-04-222026-04-22 Bibliografiskt granskad