Umeå University's logo

umu.sePublications
System disruptions
There are recurring service disruptions on some of the search portals due to high traffic. We are working to resolve the issue, you may temporarily encounter an error message.
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Survival of single-tooth implants in sites with and without history of external cervical root resorption: a register-based cohort study
Department of Endodontology, Institute of Odontology, The Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Medicinaregatan 12 D, Gothenburg, Sweden; Department of Endodontics, Tandvårdens Kompetenscentrum, Public Dental Service, BOX 922, Region Norrbotten, Skeppsbrogatan 22, Luleå, Sweden.
Department of Endodontics, Tandvårdens Kompetenscentrum, Public Dental Service, BOX 922, Region Norrbotten, Skeppsbrogatan 22, Luleå, Sweden.
Umeå University, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Odontology.ORCID iD: 0000-0001-5992-8135
2026 (English)In: BMC Oral Health, E-ISSN 1472-6831, Vol. 26, no 1, article id 1088Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Purpose: To compare the survival of single-tooth implants placed in sites with previous external cervical root resorption (ECRR) to those placed in unaffected sites.

Methods: A retrospective matched cohort study was conducted using data from the Swedish National Dental Health Register (2009–2022). Patients receiving a single-tooth implant in a site with previous ECRR were identified and matched 1:1 to controls without such history by age, sex, tooth position, and timing of implant placement (± 2 years). Implant survival, defined as time from placement to removal, was analyzed using Kaplan–Meier curves and stratified Cox proportional hazards models. Restricted mean survival time (RMST) was estimated up to 10 years. Subgroup and sensitivity analyses assessed robustness.

Results: The final cohort included 605 matched pairs (n = 1,210). The mean age was 52 years, and 56% of implants were placed in the maxillary anterior region. Implant extraction occurred in 12/571 (2.1%) sites with previous ECRR and 21/564 (3.7%) control sites. Ten-year cumulative survival was 97.3% for sites with previous ECRR and 94.4% for controls. The difference was not statistically significant (HR = 0.58; 95% CI: 0.28–1.22; p = 0.15). RMST analysis showed a negligible absolute survival difference (0.11 years; 95% CI: −0.04 to 0.25; p = 0.15).

Conclusions: Within the limitations of registry-based data and a low number of failures, no statistically significant difference in implant survival was detected between sites with and without previous ECRR. These findings suggest comparable survival outcomes but should be interpreted with caution.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
BioMed Central (BMC), 2026. Vol. 26, no 1, article id 1088
Keywords [en]
Cox proportional hazards model, Dental implants, External cervical root resorption (ECRR), Implant survival, Kaplan–Meier analysis, Registry-based cohort study
National Category
Odontology
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:umu:diva-256643DOI: 10.1186/s12903-026-08974-4ISI: 001797627100001PubMedID: 42323610Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-105042363015OAI: oai:DiVA.org:umu-256643DiVA, id: diva2:2086502
Funder
Norrbotten County Council, NLL-981599Available from: 2026-07-14 Created: 2026-07-14 Last updated: 2026-08-05Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

fulltext(1249 kB)18 downloads
File information
File name FULLTEXT01.pdfFile size 1249 kBChecksum SHA-512
c41831041bc30154cd33b15d08483f2e658f64ff6b0ed6dea6dd0d6676fafe49c9bb203c4587268b5931cabcd29fa07ac2868dcadf5dac4990b96c63ae2730d9
Type fulltextMimetype application/pdf

Other links

Publisher's full textPubMedScopus

Authority records

Pettersson, Mattias

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Pettersson, Mattias
By organisation
Department of Odontology
In the same journal
BMC Oral Health
Odontology

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn
Total: 289 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf