Umeå University's logo

umu.sePublications
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Validation of the Danish psychosocial questionnaire (DPQ) in a Swedish healthcare context
Umeå University, Faculty of Social Sciences, Department of Psychology.
Umeå University, Faculty of Social Sciences, Department of Psychology.ORCID iD: 0000-0003-4263-8080
National Research Center for the Work environment, Copenhagen, Denmark.
National Research Center for the Work environment, Copenhagen, Denmark; Copenhagen Business School, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Show others and affiliations
2026 (English)In: BMC Health Services Research, E-ISSN 1472-6963, Vol. 26, no 1, article id 977Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Background: Healthcare organizations in Europe, including Sweden, face ongoing challenges in ensuring a good work environment for their personnel, which is essential for high-quality care and job satisfaction. The Danish Psychosocial Work Environment Questionnaire (DPQ) has proven effective in various contexts but has not yet been validated in Swedish healthcare settings. This study aims to validate a Swedish translation of the DPQ in a healthcare context. We also aim to assess its validity against a broader range of outcomes than previously explored and to evaluate the feasibility of a single-item version for practical use.

Methods: The study was conducted within a public healthcare organization in northern Sweden and included 1,299 employees from four departments. The DPQ was translated into Swedish and subsequently administered, yielding a response rate of 48% at Time 1 (T1). Participants were randomly assigned to two groups: one group received the full DPQ at both time points, while the other received the full DPQ at T1 and a single-item version at Time 2 (T2). Reliability and validity were assessed using confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) whilst the evaluation of the single-item version of DPQ was done by a comparison of correlation coefficients.

Results: The Swedish DPQ demonstrated good reliability and validity, with omega values > 0.70 for all subscales. CFA confirmed the multifactor structure of the instrument. High intercorrelations between some subscales indicated potential overlap. The single-item version showed significant differences in correlation coefficients compared to the full version, suggesting it may not be a suitable alternative.

Conclusions: The Swedish translation of the DPQ is a reliable and valid tool for assessing the psychosocial work environment in healthcare. However, the single-item version may not provide an accurate representation of complex constructs. The study highlights the importance of comprehensive measures for improving working conditions and suggests further research in broader contexts.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
BioMed Central (BMC), 2026. Vol. 26, no 1, article id 977
Keywords [en]
Confirmatory factor analysis, Healthcare, Psychometric properties, Psychosocial work environment, Single-item, Validation
National Category
Epidemiology Public Health, Global Health and Social Medicine
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:umu:diva-256864DOI: 10.1186/s12913-026-15083-zScopus ID: 2-s2.0-105044541939OAI: oai:DiVA.org:umu-256864DiVA, id: diva2:2087461
Funder
Umeå UniversityRegion VästerbottenAvailable from: 2026-07-21 Created: 2026-07-21 Last updated: 2026-07-21Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

fulltext(1599 kB)21 downloads
File information
File name FULLTEXT01.pdfFile size 1599 kBChecksum SHA-512
3399c4ee8fb04a1c2e8f7f44726f1fa0c9673bddc83c6ebb697e42a606b08c9365c24b793a28b81d397a973c02482c85f05be1a22b0a37776c21ba49bfc0cb79
Type fulltextMimetype application/pdf

Other links

Publisher's full textScopus

Authority records

Agrell, AlexanderTafvelin, SusanneWahlström, JensLundmark, Robert

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Agrell, AlexanderTafvelin, SusanneWahlström, JensLundmark, Robert
By organisation
Department of PsychologyDepartment of Epidemiology and Global Health
In the same journal
BMC Health Services Research
EpidemiologyPublic Health, Global Health and Social Medicine

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

doi
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
urn-nbn
Total: 660 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf