Umeå universitets logga

umu.sePublikationer
Ändra sökning
RefereraExporteraLänk till posten
Permanent länk

Direktlänk
Referera
Referensformat
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Annat format
Fler format
Språk
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Annat språk
Fler språk
Utmatningsformat
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Strategies to evaluate a university–industry knowledge-exchange programme
Umeå universitet, Samhällsvetenskapliga fakulteten, Centrum för utvärderingsforskning (UCER).
Umeå universitet, Samhällsvetenskapliga fakulteten, Sociologiska institutionen. (UCER)
2004 (Engelska)Ingår i: Evaluation, ISSN 1356-3890, E-ISSN 1461-7153, Vol. 10, nr 4, s. 475-492Artikel i tidskrift (Refereegranskat) Published
Abstract [en]

This article discusses different approaches to evaluating a knowledgeexchange programme designed to foster closer university–industry interaction. It shows how the same policy or programme can be understood and thus evaluated in a number of ways. First, a particular knowledgeexchange programme evaluated by the authors is described. The article then outlines four different methodologies that can be used to evaluate the programme, and assesses it from the perspective of each, outlining the respective strengths and weaknesses of the approaches. The first two evaluation approaches, programme theory evaluation and outcome analysis, tend to be applied in ways that privilege the policy/programme makers’ worldview, and in this sense may be considered ‘management-oriented’ approaches; the second two approaches, policy discourse analysis and qualitative network analysis, are often applied in ways that incorporate a critical stance to this worldview, and may in this sense be considered ‘non-management-oriented’ approaches. The validity of a policy or programme evaluation can be enhanced by adopting a multi-methodological design incorporating both types of approach. Stakeholders are more likely to learn from a programme/policy evaluation and to be receptive to its conclusions if their differing perspectives and success criteria are incorporated into the evaluation.

Ort, förlag, år, upplaga, sidor
SAGE , 2004. Vol. 10, nr 4, s. 475-492
Nyckelord [en]
evaluation methodology, innovation policy, knowledge exchange, programme evaluation, university–industry collaboration
Identifikatorer
URN: urn:nbn:se:umu:diva-40085DOI: 10.1177/1356389004050217Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-33749051323OAI: oai:DiVA.org:umu-40085DiVA, id: diva2:397873
Tillgänglig från: 2011-02-21 Skapad: 2011-02-16 Senast uppdaterad: 2023-03-23Bibliografiskt granskad

Open Access i DiVA

Fulltext saknas i DiVA

Övriga länkar

Förlagets fulltextScopus

Person

Hanberger, AndersSchild, Ingrid

Sök vidare i DiVA

Av författaren/redaktören
Hanberger, AndersSchild, Ingrid
Av organisationen
Centrum för utvärderingsforskning (UCER)Sociologiska institutionen
I samma tidskrift
Evaluation

Sök vidare utanför DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
urn-nbn

Altmetricpoäng

doi
urn-nbn
Totalt: 518 träffar
RefereraExporteraLänk till posten
Permanent länk

Direktlänk
Referera
Referensformat
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Annat format
Fler format
Språk
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Annat språk
Fler språk
Utmatningsformat
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf