Umeå University's logo

umu.sePublications
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Can we trust intraocular pressure measurements in eyes with intracameral air?
Umeå University, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Clinical Sciences, Ophthalmology.ORCID iD: 0000-0003-0218-4563
Umeå University, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Clinical Sciences, Ophthalmology.
Umeå University, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Radiation Sciences, Radiation Physics.ORCID iD: 0000-0002-2031-722X
Umeå University, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Clinical Sciences, Ophthalmology.
Show others and affiliations
2014 (English)In: Graefe's Archives for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology, ISSN 0721-832X, E-ISSN 1435-702X, Vol. 252, no 10, p. 1607-1610Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

PURPOSE: To evaluate the effect of intracameral air on intraocular pressure (IOP) measurements using Goldmann applanation tonometry (GAT) and applanation resonance tonometry (ART) in an in-vitro porcine eye model.

METHODS: IOP was measured on thirteen freshly enucleated eyes at three reference pressures: 20, 30, and 40 mmHg. Six measurements/method were performed in a standardized order with GAT and ART respectively. Air was injected intracamerally in the same manner as during Descemet's stripping endothelial keratoplasty (DSEK) and Descemet's membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK), and the measurements were repeated.

RESULTS: Measured IOP increased significantly for both tonometry methods after air injection: 0.7 ± 2.1 mmHg for GAT and 10.6 ± 4.9 mmHg for ART. This difference was significant at each reference pressure for ART but not for GAT.

CONCLUSIONS: Although slightly affected, this study suggests that we can trust GAT IOP-measurements in eyes with intracameral air, such as after DSEK/DMEK operations. Ultrasound-based methods such as ART should not be used.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Springer, 2014. Vol. 252, no 10, p. 1607-1610
Keywords [en]
intraocular pressure; intracameral air; Goldmann applanation tonometry; applanation resonance tonometry; DSEK; DMEK
National Category
Ophthalmology
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:umu:diva-96875DOI: 10.1007/s00417-014-2720-5ISI: 000344631600012PubMedID: 25030238Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-84925884284OAI: oai:DiVA.org:umu-96875DiVA, id: diva2:769003
Available from: 2014-12-05 Created: 2014-12-05 Last updated: 2024-01-15Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Other links

Publisher's full textPubMedScopus

Authority records

Jóhannesson, GautiLindén, ChristinaEklund, AndersBehndig, AndersHallberg, Per

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Jóhannesson, GautiLindén, ChristinaEklund, AndersBehndig, AndersHallberg, Per
By organisation
OphthalmologyRadiation Physics
In the same journal
Graefe's Archives for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology
Ophthalmology

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn
Total: 618 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf