Umeå universitets logga

umu.sePublikationer
Ändra sökning
RefereraExporteraLänk till posten
Permanent länk

Direktlänk
Referera
Referensformat
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Annat format
Fler format
Språk
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Annat språk
Fler språk
Utmatningsformat
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
IARC Monographs: 40 Years of Evaluating Carcinogenic Hazards to Humans
Visa övriga samt affilieringar
2015 (Engelska)Ingår i: Journal of Environmental Health Perspectives, ISSN 0091-6765, E-ISSN 1552-9924, Vol. 123, nr 6, s. 507-514Artikel i tidskrift (Refereegranskat) Published
Abstract [en]

BACKGROUND: Recently the International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) Programme for the Evaluation of Carcinogenic Risks to Humans has been criticized for several of its evaluations, and also the approach used to perform these evaluations. Some critics have claimed that IARC Working Groups' failures to recognize study weaknesses and biases of Working Group members have led to inappropriate classification of a number of agents as carcinogenic to humans.

OBJECTIVES: The authors of this paper are scientists from various disciplines relevant to the identification and hazard evaluation of human carcinogens. We have examined here criticisms of the IARC classification process to determine the validity of these concerns. We review the history of IARC evaluations and describe how the IARC evaluations are performed.

DISCUSSION: We conclude that these recent criticisms are unconvincing. The procedures employed by IARC to assemble Working Groups of scientists from the various discipline and the techniques followed to review the literature and perform hazard assessment of various agents provide a balanced evaluation and an appropriate indication of the weight of the evidence. Some disagreement by individual scientists to some evaluations is not evidence of process failure. The review process has been modified over time and will undoubtedly be altered in the future to improve the process. Any process can in theory be improved, and we would support continued review and improvement of the IARC processes. This does not mean, however, that the current procedures are flawed.

CONCLUSIONS: The IARC Monographs have made, and continue to make, major contributions to the scientific underpinning for societal actions to improve the public's health.

Ort, förlag, år, upplaga, sidor
2015. Vol. 123, nr 6, s. 507-514
Nationell ämneskategori
Arbetsmedicin och miljömedicin
Identifikatorer
URN: urn:nbn:se:umu:diva-100368DOI: 10.1289/ehp.1409149ISI: 000357296200010PubMedID: 25712798Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-84930511271OAI: oai:DiVA.org:umu-100368DiVA, id: diva2:791812
Tillgänglig från: 2015-03-02 Skapad: 2015-03-02 Senast uppdaterad: 2023-03-24Bibliografiskt granskad

Open Access i DiVA

fulltext(738 kB)1590 nedladdningar
Filinformation
Filnamn FULLTEXT01.pdfFilstorlek 738 kBChecksumma SHA-512
ba6ac6856d9e8fc0b18403bdee0340b47430c38fbf61114dd01967d2965ec640f602bfbd4333d2f4e0e73a6d8414e2b5297b746c4aef888ffd4f0b54f27ab1e2
Typ fulltextMimetyp application/pdf

Övriga länkar

Förlagets fulltextPubMedScopus

Person

Järvholm, Bengt

Sök vidare i DiVA

Av författaren/redaktören
Järvholm, Bengt
Av organisationen
Yrkes- och miljömedicin
I samma tidskrift
Journal of Environmental Health Perspectives
Arbetsmedicin och miljömedicin

Sök vidare utanför DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
Totalt: 1590 nedladdningar
Antalet nedladdningar är summan av nedladdningar för alla fulltexter. Det kan inkludera t.ex tidigare versioner som nu inte längre är tillgängliga.

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn

Altmetricpoäng

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn
Totalt: 423 träffar
RefereraExporteraLänk till posten
Permanent länk

Direktlänk
Referera
Referensformat
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Annat format
Fler format
Språk
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Annat språk
Fler språk
Utmatningsformat
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf