Umeå universitets logga

Introduction: The aim of this study was to evaluate intraocular lens (IOL) tilt, IOL-induced astigmatism (IIA), refractive change, and impact of capsular fibrosis on IOL position after scleral fixation of dislocated IOL using two methods: ab externo scleral suture loop fixation (group A) and a modification, embracing the continuous curvilinear capsulorhexis (group B).

Methods: In this prospective randomized clinical trial conducted at St. Erik Eye Hospital, 117 patients with dislocated IOL were randomized to group A (n = 61) or B (n = 56). Patients with ordinary pseudophakia (n = 60) served as controls. IOL tilt was measured three-dimensionally with anterior segment optical coherence tomography (AS-OCT).

Results: The median IOL tilt was similar with both methods (A: 7.8°; B: 8.3°; p = 0.51) but higher than in ordinary pseudophakia (5.4°; p < 0.001). Both groups showed a myopic shift, p < 0.001. In cases without capsular fibrosis, the median IOL tilt was 15.5° in group A (n = 7) and 7.0° in group B (n = 5), p = 0.19. For each degree of IOL tilt, IIA increased by 0.075 D (p < 0.001). IOL position could be measured with AS-OCT in all patients given that the IOL was visible in the pupil.

Conclusion: After IOL fixation surgery, IOL tilt is higher than in normal pseudophakia. A study involving more patients without capsular fibrosis could clarify whether IOL position is better with method B in this subgroup. IAA is low, but myopic shift is common. AS-OCT is useful for IOL tilt assessment after IOL fixation surgery.

PURPOSE: To assess Uveitis-Glaucoma-Hyphaema syndrome (UGH syndrome) with focus on resolution, glaucoma development and risk factors.

METHODS: This retrospective case-control study with a cross-sectional component was performed to compare three groups with 71 patients each: UGH syndrome, dislocated intraocular lens (IOL) without UGH syndrome and ordinary pseudophakia. Main outcome measures were resolution of the UGH syndrome, best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) and the need of glaucoma therapy. We also assessed the IOL-iris contact signs and the use of blood thinners.

RESULTS: Uveitis-Glaucoma-Hyphaema (UGH) syndrome resolved in 77 % of patients who underwent various kind of IOL surgery. Intraocular pressure (IOP) decreased and BCVA improved in the operated cases (p = 0.02 and p < 0.001, respectively), but not in the cases treated conservatively. Intraocular pressure (IOP) ≥22 mmHg at the first haemorrhage predicted the need of glaucoma therapy after UGH syndrome resolution (p = 0.002, area under the curve = 0.8). Fifty-one per cent of patients without preexisting glaucoma needed glaucoma therapy after UGH syndrome resolution. Pseudophacodonesis was seen more frequently in the UGH group than in the ordinary pseudophakia group (p = 0.001). Iris defects were not more frequent in the UGH group than in the Dislocated group but the types of defects differed (p < 0.0001). Blood thinners were not more frequent in UGH.

CONCLUSION: In UGH syndrome, the results are better with surgical intervention than with conservative treatment, but surgery does not guarantee resolution. Pseudophacodonesis is a risk factor for UGH syndrome, but blood thinners are not, and iris defects are not specific to UGH syndrome. A high IOP at the first haemorrhage increases the risk for needing subsequent IOP-lowering therapy.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of iris suture fixation of out-of-the-bag dislocated three-piece intraocular lenses (IOL).

METHODS: In a retrospective interventional consecutive case series, a chart review was performed in two groups of patients: fourteen patients with a dislocated out-of-the-bag three-piece IOL that underwent IOL fixation to the iris using the Siepser sliding knot technique (Iris group) and 18 patients with in-the-bag dislocation that underwent IOL exchange with a new scleral-sutured IOL (Exchange group). The Iris and Exchange groups were compared regarding surgical safety and efficacy. The median follow-up time was 13.5 months [interquartile range (IQR), 10-20] in the Iris group and 12.5 (IQR, 10-14) in the Exchange group.

RESULTS: The best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) improved significantly in both groups (p = 0.005 and 0.00006, respectively). No difference in final BCVA was seen between the groups. Significantly less surgically induced astigmatism (p = 0.03) and a lower number of postoperative visits (p = 0.0006) was noted in the Iris group. Considering the type of surgery, there were few complications in the present material.

CONCLUSION: In the study, suturing dislocated three-piece IOLs to the iris appeared to be an acceptable surgical management with less surgically induced corneal astigmatism and fewer postoperative visits than IOL exchange. A larger study with a longer follow-up time would be desirable to confirm the results.

Abstract

PURPOSE: To identify preoperative and intraoperative factors associated with a capsule complication; that is, a capsule tear or a zonular dehiscence during cataract surgery. SETTING: Ten ophthalmic surgery departments in Sweden. METHODS: A retrospective review of files of patients with a capsule complication and control patients with no complication operated on in 2003 was performed. RESULTS: The review comprised 324 patients with a capsule complication and 331 control patients. In the logistic regression analyses, preoperative conditions associated with a capsule complication were previous trauma, white and brunescent/hard cataract, and phacodonesis. The intraoperative factors of loose zonules, the use of trypan blue, and miosis were all statistically significantly overrepresented in the capsule complication group. The same was true for eyes operated on by surgeons with the least experience. CONCLUSIONS: By preoperatively identifying cataract cases with the identified risk factors and allocating them to surgeons with the longest experience, the number of capsule complications could be kept low. Operating early in the course of the disease to prevent the cataract from becoming a poor surgical risk and improving training of junior surgeons should further reduce the frequency of capsule complications.

Purpose: To determine whether intracameral acetylcholine can contract pupils dilated with intracameral mydriatics in phacoemulsification cataract surgery. Methods: A total of 60 patients were included in this prospective randomized masked study performed at ornskoldsviks Hospital Eye Clinic. The patients were randomized and were given either topical placebo and an intracameral mydriatic solution (ICM) (cyclopentolate 0.1%, phenylephrine 1.5% and xylocaine 1%) (n=30) or topical mydriatics (TM) (cyclopentolate 0.85% and phenylephrine 1.5%) and xylocaine 1% intracamerally (n=30) at the start of surgery. After intraocular lens (IOL) implantation, 0.15ml 1% acetylcholine was given intracamerally in all cases. The pupil size was registered preoperatively, 45seconds after intracameral injection, after ophthalmic viscosurgical device (OVD) evacuation, 30seconds after acetylcholine injection, 2min after acetylcholine injection and the day after surgery. Results: The pupil contraction and pupil size after acetylcholine injection showed no significant differences at 30seconds (contraction 1.0 +/- 0.4 in ICM group versus 0.9 +/- 0.4 in TM group; p=0.75; size 4.8 +/- 1.1 in the ICM group versus 5.2 +/- 1.1 in the TM group; p=0.24) or at 2min (contraction 1.5 +/- 0.6 in the ICM group versus 1.4 +/- 0.6 in the TM group; p=0.63; size 4.3 +/- 0.9 in the ICM group versus 4.7 +/- 1.0 in the TM group; p=0.13). No difference in baseline pupil size after ophthalmic viscosurgical device (OVD) evacuation was seen between the two groups (5.8 +/- 0.9 in the ICM group versus 6.1 +/- 1.2 in the TM group; p=0.28). Conclusion: We here show that intracameral acetylcholine contracts pupils as effectively after dilatation with intracameral mydriatics as after dilatation with topical mydriatics. Cataract surgeons can feel comfortable and safe when using intracameral mydriatics, even if pupil contraction with acetylcholine should be required.

Importance: A reliable tool for quantification of the biomechanical status of the cornea in conjunction with corneal collagen crosslinking (CXL) treatment is needed.

Objective: To quantify the biomechanical effects of CXL in vivo.

Design, Setting, and Participants: A prospective, open, case-control study was conducted at the Department of Ophthalmology, Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden. Participants included 28 patients (29 eyes) aged 18 to 28 years with progressive keratoconus and corresponding age- and sex-matched healthy individuals serving as controls. All participants were monitored during a 6-month period between October 13, 2009, and November 5, 2012.

Main Outcomes and Measures: Corneal hysteresis after CXL for keratoconus.

Results: A difference in corneal hysteresis between the control group and the patients with keratoconus was found at baseline, both with an applanation resonance tonometer (ART) and an ocular response analyzer (ORA), at mean (SD) values of -1.09 (1.92) mm Hg (99% CI, -2.26 to 0.07; P = .01) and -2.67 (2.55) mm Hg (99% CI, -4.05 to -1.32; P < .001), respectively. Increased corneal hysteresis was demonstrated with an ART 1 and 6 months after CXL, at 1.2 (2.4) mm Hg (99% CI,-0.1 to 2.5; P = .02) and 1.1 (2.7) mm Hg (99% CI, -0.3 to 2.6; P = .04), respectively, but not with ORA. A decrease in corneal thickness was seen 1 and 6 months after treatment (-24 [26] µm, P < .001; and -11 [21] µm, P = .01, respectively), and a corneal flattening of -0.6 (0.7) diopters was seen at 6 months (P < .001). No significant change in intraocular pressure was identified in patients with keratoconus with any method, except for an increase at 1 month with Goldmann applanation tonometry (P = .005).

Conclusions and Relevance: To our knowledge ART is the first in vivo method able to assess the increased corneal hysteresis after CXL treatment. Given the large-scale use of CXL in modern keratoconus treatment, a tool with this capacity has a great potential value. Refinement of the ART method of measuring and quantifying corneal biomechanical properties will be a subject of further studies.

Purpose: To compare refractive changes after corneal crosslinking with and without mechanical compression of the cornea.

Methods: In a prospective, open, randomized case-control study conducted at the Department of Ophthalmology, Umeå University Hospital, Sweden, sixty eyes of 43 patients with progressive keratoconus aged 18-28 years planned for corneal crosslinking and corresponding age- and sex-matched control subjects were included. The patients were randomized to conventional corneal crosslinking (CXL; n = 30) or corneal crosslinking with mechanical compression using a flat rigid contact lens sutured to the cornea during treatment (CRXL; n = 30). Subjective refraction and ETDRS best spectacle-corrected visual acuity (BSCVA), axial length measurement, keratometry and pachymetry were performed before and 1 and 6 months after treatment.

Results: The keratoconus patients had poorer BSCVA, higher refractive astigmatism and higher keratometry readings than the control subjects at baseline (p < 0.01). In the CXL group, BSCVA increased from 0.19 ± 0.26 to 0.14 ± 0.18 logMar (p = 0.03), and the spherical equivalent improved from -1.9 ± 2.8 D to -1.4 ± 2.4 D (p = 0.03). Maximum keratometry readings decreased after CXL from 53.1 ± 4.9 D to 52.6 ± 5.2 D (p = 0.02), and the axial length decreased in the CXL group, likely due to post-treatment corneal thinning (p = 0.03). In the CRXL group, all the above variables were unaltered (p > 0.05).

Conclusion: At 6 months, the refractive results from CRXL did not surpass those of conventional CXL treatment. Rather, some variables indicated a slightly inferior effect. Possibly, stronger crosslinking would be necessary to stabilize the cornea in the flattened configuration achieved by the rigid contact lens.

Purpose: To assess the spatial distribution and time course of increased corneal light scattering after corneal collagen crosslinking (CXL) with riboflavin and ultraviolet-A irradiation.

Setting: Umeå University Hospital Eye Clinic, Umeå, Sweden.

Design: Case series.

Methods: Eyes with keratoconus were examined with Scheimpflug photography before and 1 and 6 months after CXL. Corneal light scattering was quantified throughout the corneal thickness at 8 measurement points 0.0 to 3.0 mm from the central cornea.

Results: The study comprised 11 eyes of 11 patients. Central corneal light scattering increased significantly 1 month after CXL (P<.001). At 6 months, it decreased (P=.002); however, it was still higher than pretreatment values (P<.001). Light scattering at 1 month was more pronounced in the superficialstroma, gradually diminishing to zero at 240 μm depth. It was greater at the corneal center than 1.0 to 3.0 mm from the center. At 6 months, a second peak of light scattering occurred between 240 μm and 340 μm depth. No increased light scattering deeper than 340 μm was seen at either time point.

Conclusions: Corneal light scattering after CXL showed distinctive spatial and temporal profiles. Analysis of corneal light scattering may give an impression of tissue changes, the depth of the CXL treatment effect, and the corneal response to the treatment. Scheimpflug photography appears to be useful for this purpose.

Importance: We describe and evaluate a complementary method to indirectly quantify the treatment effect of corneal cross-linking (CXL). Additional methods to indirectly quantify the treatment effect of CXL are needed.

Objective: To assess the spatial distribution and the time course of the increased corneal densitometry (corneal light backscatter) seen after CXL with riboflavin and UV-A irradiation.

Design, Setting, and Participants: Open-label randomized clinical trial of 43 patients (60 eyes) who were 18 to 28 years of age and had progressive keratoconus and a plan to be treated with CXL at Umeå University Hospital, Umeå, Sweden. The patients were randomized to receive conventional CXL (n = 30) using the Dresden protocol or CXL with mechanical compression of the cornea using a flat rigid contact lens sutured to the cornea during the treatment (CRXL) (n = 30). All participants were followed up during a 6-month period from October 13, 2009, through May 31, 2012.

Interventions: Corneal cross-linking according to the Dresden protocol or CRXL.

Main Outcomes and Measures: Change in corneal densitometry after CXL and CRXL for keratoconus.

Results: Of the original 60 eyes included, 4 had incomplete data. A densitometry increase was seen after both treatments that was deeper and more pronounced in the CXL group (difference between the groups at 1 month in the center layer, zone 0-2 mm, 5.02 grayscale units [GSU], 95% CI, 2.92-7.12 GSU; P < .001). This increase diminished with time but was still noticeable at 6 months (difference between the groups at 6 months in the center layer, zone 0-2 mm, 3.47 GSU; 95% CI, 1.72-5.23 GSU; P < .001) and was proportional to the reduction in corneal steepness (R = -0.45 and -0.56 for CXL and CRXL, respectively).

Conclusions and Relevance: The degree of corneal light backscatter relates to the reduction in corneal steepness after cross-linking and may become a relevant complement to other methods in evaluating the cross-linking effect, for example, when comparing different treatment regimens.

Trial Registration: clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT02425150.

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to quantify the mydriatic and cycloplegic effects from topically applied lidocaine hydrochloride 4% and tetracaine hydrochloride 1% in healthy volunteers. METHODS: Twenty-six (26) healthy volunteers age 23 +/- 2.5 years were included in this double-masked, randomized, intraindividually comparing study. All participants were given a drop of lidocaine 4% in 1 eye and tetracaine 1% in the contralateral eye three times with a 90-sec interval, which was subject to randomization. Before the eye drops, and 15, 30, 45, 60, 90, and 120 min after the application of the last drop, Scheimpflug photography was performed in each eye, and the near point was determined using a near-point ruler. Before the eye drops and at 60 and 120 min, the visual acuity was determined with the ETDRS chart. The extent and time course of the mydriatic and cycloplegic responses were determined. RESULTS: Significant pupil dilation was seen with both substances; an increase from 3.25 +/- 0.48 to 3.52 +/- 0.76 mm (8.8 +/- 3.9%; P = 0.036) at 30 min with lidocaine, and from 3.19 +/- 0.46 to 3.44 +/- 0.49 mm (8.8 +/- 2.9%; P = 0.008) at 45 min with tetracaine. A subgroup analysis revealed that a mydriatic effect could only be detected in eyes with pale irides (P < 0.01). In pigmented irides, a slight miotic effect was noted. A decrease in accommodation was also seen: from 9.8 +/- 1.6 to 9.1 +/- 1.7 D (6.3 +/- 2.9%) at 15 min with lidocaine, and from 9.7 +/- 1.4 to 8.8 +/- 1.5 D (7.8 +/- 3.7%) at 30 min with tetracaine. Again, the effect was more pronounced in pale irides (P < 0.05). Both substances induced a small increase in corneal thickness (P < 0.01). A substantial epithelial opacification was noted with tetracaine, but not with lidocaine. CONCLUSIONS: Lidocaine 4% and tetracaine 1% exhibit significant mydriatic effects upon topical administration in eyes with pale irides. The mydriatic effect is more rapid and prolonged with lidocaine than with tetracaine.

Keratoconus is a corneal thinning disease of largely unknown cause. The disease affects mainly young, healthy individuals, and leads to pronounced refractive errors and visual impairment. Effective treatments for keratoconus are available today, but require an early diagnosis. Awareness of the condition can contribute to it being discovered in time.

A phacoemulsification procedure with implantation of a foldable acrylic intraocular lens in a 31-year-old man with spherophakia is described. The procedure was necessitated by anterior dislocation of the spherophakic lens, with corneal endothelial contact and development of central corneal edema. With a careful approach, the procedure was uneventful and the outcome successful. Modern small-incision cataract surgery techniques are of great benefit in this type of complicated case.

PURPOSE / METHODS: The long-term results obtained by a modified method of scleral suturing of posterior chamber lenses (PCLs) (Behndig & Otto 1997) were retrospectively registered and evaluated. Forty-four patients with insufficient capsular support for ordinary PCL implantation were included. Mean follow-up time was 13.1 +/- 6.4 months and registered parameters included visual acuity, deviation from planned refractive outcome, induced astigmatism, and complications. RESULTS / CONCLUSIONS: The results were comparable to those reported earlier for this type of surgery. It has previously been stated that scleral suturing of posterior chamber lenses is a safe procedure with good long-term results. This modified method produces comparable results while being more surgically simple and reproducible.

Data on practice patterns for prophylaxis against infectious postoperative endophthalmitis (IPOE) during cataract surgery in 9 European countries were searched in national registers and reviews of published surveys. Summary reports assessed each nation's IPOE rates, nonantibiotic prophylactic routines, topical and intracameral antibiotic use, and coherence to the European Society of Cataract & Refractive Surgeons (ESCRS) 2007 guidelines. Although the reliability and completeness of available data vary between countries, the results show that IPOE rates differ significantly. Asepsis routines with povidone iodine and postoperative topical antibiotics are generally adopted. Use of preoperative and perioperative topical antibiotics as well as intracameral cefuroxime varies widely between and within countries. Five years after publication of the ESCRS guidelines, there is no consensus on intracameral cefuroxime use. Major obstacles include legal barriers or persisting controversy about the scientific rationale for systematic intracameral cefuroxime use in some countries and, until recently, lack of a commercially available preparation.

PURPOSE: To report the results from the first iteration of the European Observatory of Cataract Surgery, which was initiated to track changes in surgical, antiseptic, and antibiotic practices in cataract surgery over the coming years. SETTING: Practicing European cataract surgeons (n = 479). DESIGN: Internet-based declarative questionnaire or telephone questionnaire. METHODS: The questionnaire comprised 37 questions divided into 8 categories as follows: screening, surgeon profile, surgical procedure used, product use before arrival at the operating room, techniques for mydriasis and anesthesia, product use during the surgery, product use after the patient leaves the operating room, and surgeon's attitude to guidelines. RESULTS: Cataract surgeons (n = 2700) were initially contacted, of whom 479 (17.7%) were included in the survey. The current baseline survey revealed considerable variation between countries in their implementation of infectious postoperative endophthalmitis (IPOE) prophylaxis. In some countries, adoption of intracameral cefuroxime is almost universal, whereas in others, the use of such prophylaxis is below one half. When intracameral cefuroxime is used, it is generally cefuroxime powder designed for parenteral use. A preparation specifically registered for intracameral use is now available, and this formulation is more commonly used in countries in which intracameral cefuroxime was most widely adopted. CONCLUSION: The baseline results from this ongoing survey suggest a considerable level of heterogeneity between European countries in IPOE prophylaxis. Further iterations of this survey will monitor whether a consensus begins to emerge. Financial Disclosures: This work was supported by Laboratoires Thea, under the supervision of the expert group. Members of the expert group were remunerated by Laboratoires Thea J.F. Stolz, MD, PhD, provided editorial assistance in manuscript preparation, for which he was remunerated by Laboratoires Thea Anders Behndig, Rita Mencucci, and Jacek P. Szaflik report no relevant conflicts of interest.

PURPOSE: To evaluate surgical performance using intracameral mydriatics (ICM) in phacoemulsification surgery in a series of consecutive cases. METHODS: In a series of 198 consecutive procedures 50-200 microl of cyclopentolate 0.1%, phenylephrine 1.5% and lidocaine 1% was given intracamerally for mydriasis and anaesthesia. The previous 198 cases, dilated with topical mydriatics, were studied for comparison. Several pre- intra- and postoperative parameters were registered, and the subjective surgical performance was graded after each procedure. In 41 consecutive cases, the change in pulse and oxygen saturation induced by the ICM injection was registered. RESULTS: No increase in operation time or complication rates was seen with ICM, compared to when standard topical mydriatics were used. The subjective surgical performance was ranked as equally good for both groups. CONCLUSION: From this clinical evaluation, our impression is that ICM performs well in routine phacoemulsification surgery.

Mydriatic eyedrops are the standard method for pupil dilation in cataract surgery, but their limitations have prompted a search for alternative techniques. Two alternatives an ophthalmic insert containing phenylephrine and tropicamide and intracameral injections of various combinations of lidocaine, cyclopentolate, and phenylephrine, with or without epinephrine in the irrigating solution have been assessed in prospective controlled studies, including randomized controlled trials (RCTs). We reviewed the safety and efficacy of mydriatic ophthalmic inserts and intracameral mydriatic injections compared with the safety and efficacy of mydriatic eyedrops using a systematic Pub Med search (1963 to 2014). We identified 9 prospective studies (7 RCTs, 637 patients) of the mydriatic ophthalmic insert and 15 prospective studies (14 RCTs, 1020 patients) of intracameral mydriatic injections; 7 of the RCTs compared intracameral mydriatic injections and mydriatic eyedrops and 7 RCTs studied the optimum intracameral mydriatic injection protocol. The latter showed that a lidocaine and phenylephrine based solution, without irrigating epinephrine, was optimum for intracameral mydriatic injections. The mydriatic ophthalmic insert and intracameral mydriatic injections were consistently shown to be safe and as effective as mydriatic eyedrops. Each method has distinct advantages and limitations. 

PURPOSE: To assess aqueous humor lidocaine concentrations in 2 common regimens of topical anesthesia and after intracameral injection of the anesthetic agent. SETTING: University hospital eye clinic. METHODS: Twenty patients having routine cataract surgery were randomized into 3 groups: 1 given 3 drops of lidocaine 4% before surgery; 1 given 6 drops; 1 given 3 drops plus an intracameral injection of 0.1 mL lidocaine 1%. Lidocaine concentration was measured in aqueous humor samples taken before surgery. RESULTS: With 3 drops, aqueous lidocaine concentration was 1.4 micrograms/mL +/- 0.5 (SD) and with 6 drops, 4.3 +/- 1.5 micrograms/mL (P = .0015). With an intracameral injection, it was 341.8 +/- 152.6 micrograms/mL. CONCLUSION: Measurable amounts of lidocaine entered the anterior chamber in topical anesthesia, and more entered when more drops were given. It is likely that concentrations in this range could anesthetize the iris, but they are far lower than concentrations after an intracameral injection.

Results show that phenylephrine injected intracamerally does not have a linear mydriatic dose-response relationship in humans. At very high concentrations, phenylephrine may bind to and stimulate receptors other than the α(1)-receptor, explaining this phenomenon.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the effect of different viscoelastic substances on the grade and time course of postoperative corneal edema. SETTING: Department of Clinical Sciences/Ophthalmology, Umeå University Hospital, Umeå, Sweden. METHODS: This study comprised 62 patients with otherwise healthy eyes who had routine phacoemulsification and intraocular lens (IOL) implantation. Patients were divided into 3 groups. Group 1 was given Healon GV (sodium hyaluronate 1.4%) at phacoemulsification and IOL implantation. Group 2 was given Viscoat (sodium hyaluronate 3.0%-chondroitin sulfate 4.0%) at phacoemulsification and Healon GV at IOL implantation. Group 3 was given Viscoat at phacoemulsification and Provisc (sodium hyaluronate 1.0%) at lens implantation. The central corneal thickness was measured with ultrasonic pachymetry before surgery and 5 and 24 hours, 1 week, and 1 month after surgery. RESULTS: The mean increase in corneal thickness was significantly greater in Group 1 than in the other 2 groups 5 and 24 hours and 1 week after surgery. CONCLUSIONS: The transient postoperative increase in central corneal thickness was greater in patients receiving Healon GV during phacoemulsification than in patients receiving Viscoat. The use of Provisc or Healon GV for IOL implantation did not affect the postoperative corneal thickness when Viscoat was used for phacoemulsification. The time course of the edema may be explained by a difference between the 2 agents in endothelial protection from ultrasonic, mechanical, or irrigation trauma.

In this study involving 12 patients planned for routine cataract surgery, we used the topography of the anterior chamber depth and the corneal diameter obtained from Orbscan II data to calculate the aqueous humor volume. Prior to the surgical procedure, a small amount of fluorescein was injected into the anterior chamber and an aqueous humor sample was taken, from which the aqueous humor volume could be calculated by fluorometry. The volumes obtained from Orbscan II data were validated by the fluorometric measurements and compared to three theoretical formulas for aqueous humor volume calculation. The aqueous humor volume calculations based on the Orbscan II data aligned better to the fluorometric values (R(2) = 0.890) than the values obtained by Heim's formula (R(2) = 0.677), Brubaker's formula (R(2) = 0.671), and Schenker's formula (R(2) = 0.585), or the assumption of a constant aqueous humor volume.

Purpose

To analyze changes over time in biometry prediction error (BPE) after cataract surgery with special reference to the impact of gender and the intra-ocular lens (IOL) calculation formula.

Methods

About 65% of Swedish cataract surgery units participating in the outcome registration of the National Cataract Register (NCR) were included in this prospective register study. Data for planned and postoperative refraction and keratometry during the month of March 2004-2013 were analyzed, divided by gender. The newly introduced variables axial length and IOL calculation formula were analyzed for March 2013. Gender differences in BPE with correct sign (BPESign) and absolute biometry prediction error (BPEAbs) were compared for the Haigis' and Sanders-Retzlaff-Kraff T (SRK/T) formulas.

Results

The BPEAbs decreased throughout the study period. In 2004-2006, the BPEAbs was larger in women than in men (p<0.05), but this difference disappeared from 2007. For 2004 through 2009, the mean BPESign was -0.1050.79D for women, but -0.003 +/- 0.73D for men. After 2009, this myopic error for women gradually diminished. The Haigis' formula performed better in women than the SRK/T formula (p<0.001); the SRK/T formula rendered a BPESign similar to that from 2004 to 2009 in women. Women had steeper corneas and shorter axial lengths than men (p<0.001).

Conclusion

The myopic BPE in women - associated with steeper corneas and shorter axial lengths - is decreasing, possibly owing to an increased use of the Haigis' formula. Using the Haigis' formula to a higher extent can potentially further reduce the BPEs after cataract surgery.

This review summarizes data collected by the Swedish National Cataract Register, which now contains data pertaining to more than a million cataract surgery procedures, representing 95.6% of the surgeries performed in Sweden during 1992-2009. During this period, the rate of cataract surgery rose from 4.47 to 9.00 per 1000 inhabitants. The mean patient age increased until 1999 but has slowly decreased since then. Preoperative visual acuity has risen steadily. The distribution between the sexes was stable until 2000, after which the proportion of women slowly decreased. Registration of subjective benefit has brought new knowledge regarding indications and expectations. An improved questionnaire, Catquest-9SF has been used since 2008. The outcome register generally shows good results from the surgery. Endophthalmitis has decreased from 0.10% to below 0.040%.

PURPOSE: To assess and analyze refractive outcome after cataract surgery in Sweden from 2008 though 2010. SETTING: Swedish cataract surgery units participating in outcome registration of National Cataract Register. DESIGN: Cohort study. METHODS: Planned and actual postoperative refractions were analyzed for cataract procedures and preoperative and postoperative corneal astigmatism for procedures performed in 2008 though 2010. Induced astigmatism was calculated with Naeser and Behrens polar coordinates. RESULTS: Postoperative refraction was analyzed for 17 056 procedures and corneal astigmatism for 7448 procedures. Emmetropia was targeted in 78.1% of eyes and achieved in 52.7%; 43.0% had less than 1.00 diopter (D) of astigmatism. "Reading myopia" of -3.5 to -1.6 D was targeted in 7.0% of eyes and achieved in 7.8%. Planned hyperopia greater than 1.0 D or myopia greater than -3.5 D was rare. The mean absolute biometry prediction error was 0.402 D +/- 0.338 (SD) in all eyes; however, astigmatic eyes and eyes planned for myopia or hyperopia had higher biometry prediction errors. Younger patients were more often astigmatic and planned for a more myopic outcome. Preoperatively, one third of eyes had more than 1.0 D of corneal astigmatism; postoperatively this figure was largely unaltered. The mean induced astigmatism was 0.525 +/- 0.804 D in all eyes. CONCLUSIONS: Emmetropia (spherical equivalent -0.5 to + 0.5 D and <1.0 D astigmatism) is the goal in most cataract cases but was reached in only 55% of eyes planned for emmetropia. Factors precluding emmetropia included remaining corneal astigmatism and biometry prediction errors in astigmatic and ametropic eyes.

We describe a method of quantifying glistenings in intraocular lenses (IOLs) using Scheimpflug photography. Glistenings in hydrophilic acrylic IOLs implanted over a 10-year period were quantified subjectively at the slitlamp and by digital image analysis of Scheimpflug photographs; the latter involved analysis of glistenings in the anterior and posterior IOL surfaces. Glistenings were seen in all IOLs, with more in those with a longer postoperative period. This association was stronger with Scheimpflug quantification (r(S) = 0.70; P<.000) than with subjective quantification (r(S) = 0.32; P = .11). Anterior and posterior IOL glistenings developed similarly over time. Scheimpflug photography had a higher degree of objectivity than subjective staging of IOL glistenings and also provided information about the axial localization of the glistenings. This investigation indicated that IOL glistenings continued to increase for up to 10 years.

The present review summarizes data collected by the Swedish National Cataract Register (NCR), which by the end of 2021 contained data for more than 2.4 million cataract surgeries between 1992 and 2021. During these 30 years, the cataract surgery rate rose from 3700 to 12 800. The coverage of NCR is very high including 93% of all cataract procedures in Sweden between 2010 and 2021. Independently of demographic changes, the proportion of operations of patients age 60 to 79 has increased while the proportion of 80 to 90+ has decreased. The median visual acuity of the first eye planned for surgery was 0.1 decimal in 1992 and has increased to 0.5 decimal in 2021. Patient-reported outcome measures have been registered with the Catquest-9SF questionnaire since 2008, demonstrating intervention at an earlier stage, but consistently favorable outcomes. Surgical complications have decreased; endophthalmitis has decreased from 0.10% to below 0.02%, and posterior capsule rupture from 2.8% to 0.6%.

PURPOSE: To examine the distribution of the alpha11 integrin chain in the human cornea during fetal development and in normal and diseased adult human corneas.

METHODS: Six fetal corneas, 10 to 20 weeks of gestation (wg), and 18 adult corneas including 3 normal, 7 with keratoconus, 5 with pseudophakic bullous keratopathy (PBK), 2 with Fuchs' corneal dystrophy, and 1 with a scar after deep lamellar keratoplasty (DLKP) were processed for immunohistochemistry with specific antibodies against the alpha11 integrin chain; collagen I, IV, and V; and alpha-smooth muscle actin (alpha-SMA). The cellular source of alpha11 integrin chain was further investigated in cell cultures.

RESULTS: At 10 to 17 wg, the alpha11 integrin chain was predominantly present in the anterior corneal stroma. At 20 wg, in normal adult corneas and in Fuchs' dystrophy corneas there was weak staining in the stroma. The PBK corneas showed variable and weak staining, generally accentuated in the posterior stroma near Descemet's membrane. In contrast, the anterior portion of the stroma in the keratoconus corneas was strongly stained in an irregular streaky pattern. Human corneal fibroblasts/myofibroblasts produced alpha11 integrin chain in culture. Cultures treated with TGF-beta showed higher content of both alpha-SMA and the alpha11 integrin chain.

CONCLUSIONS: The presence of the alpha11 integrin chain during early corneal development and the enhanced expression in scarred keratoconus corneas indicates that this integrin chain is likely to play an important role in collagen deposition during corneal development and in keratoconus with a scarring component and compromised basement membrane integrity.

PURPOSE: To determine whether intracameral mydriatics can redilate pupils that contract during phacoemulsification cataract surgery. METHODS: A total of 80 patients were included in this prospective, randomized, double-blind study performed at Ornsköldsviks Hospital Eye Clinic. Of these, 60 patients had 0.6 microg/ml of epinephrine added to the balanced salt solution (BSS) used for irrigation and 20 patients did not. The patients in each group were randomized and given either an intracameral mydriatics (ICM) solution or placebo intracamerally after phacoemulsification and cortex cleaning. The pupil size was registered preoperatively, after cortex cleaning, 30 seconds after study injection, 2 mins after study injection and the day after surgery. RESULTS: No clinically relevant differences were found preoperatively. In the epinephrine material a significantly longer operation time (p = 0.023) and more procedures requiring Vision Blue and Kelman-type tip in the placebo group might indicate diversity in the grade of cataract. There was a greater degree of contraction in the absence of epinephrine in the irrigation solution (2.3 +/- 1.0 mm in the ICM group and 3.2 +/- 0.7 mm in the placebo group) compared to in the presence of epinephrine. With no epinephrine ICM significantly redilated the pupils at 30 seconds (p < or = 0.001) as well as at 2 mins (p = 0.015). CONCLUSION: We have shown that in cases with an intraoperative pupil contraction, ICM is effective in redilating the pupil. Insufficient adrenergic stimulation of the pupil dilator appears to be a major factor causing intraoperative pupil contraction during phacoemulsification cataract surgery.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to examine the effects of 17β-estradiol on proliferation, cell death and redox status in cultured human lens epithelial cells (HLECs).

METHODS: HLECs were exposed to 17β-estradiol after which cell viability was measured by 3-(4,5-dimethylthiazolyl-2)-2,5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide (MTT) and the number of mitotic and apoptotic cell nuclei was determined after staining with Hoechst 33342. Apoptosis was also determined by measuring caspase-3 activity and propidium iodide was used to determine the proportion of non-viable cells. Pro- and antioxidative effects of 17β-estradiol was investigated by measuring peroxides, superoxides and glutathione, using dichlorofluorescein diacetate (DCFH-DA), dihydroethidium (HET), and monochlorobimane (MCB), respectively. Effects on mitochondrial membrane potential were determined using 5,5',6,6'-tetrachloro-1,1',3,3'- tetraethylbenzimidazolylcarbocyanine iodide (JC-1). The ability of 17β-estradiol to prevent reactive oxygen species (ROS)-production in HLECs after exposure to 25 µM H₂O₂ for 24h was also measured.

RESULTS: This study demonstrates increased mitotic activity in HLECs exposed to physiologic concentrations of 17β-estradiol (1 nM). Pharmacological concentrations of 17β-estradiol caused increased number of apoptotic cell nuclei and caspase-3 activation. Physiologic concentrations of 17β-estradiol (0.1-10 nM) stabilized the mitochondrial membrane potential. Similar or slightly higher concentrations of 17β-estradiol (0.01-1 µM) protected against H₂O₂-induced oxidative stress as evident by decreased levels of peroxides and superoxides.

CONCLUSIONS: The present study demonstrates mitogenic and anti-oxidative effects of 17β-estradiol at physiologic concentrations, whereas pharmacological levels induced oxidative stress and acted pro-apoptotic in cultured lens cells.

Background: Functional polymorphisms in genes encoding antioxidant enzymes may result in reduced enzyme activity and increased levels of reactive oxygen species, such as superoxide radicals, which in turn may contribute to increased risk of age-related disorders. Copper-zinc superoxide dismutases, SOD-1 and SOD-3, and manganese superoxide dismutase, SOD-2, are enzymes involved in the protection against oxidative stress and detoxification of superoxide. In this study, we investigated a number of disease-associated single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) of SOD1, SOD2 and SOD3, in patients with age-related cataract.

Materials and methods: The study included an Estonian sample of 492 patients with age-related cataract, subgrouped into nuclear, cortical, posterior subcapsular and mixed cataract, and 185 controls. Twelve SNPs in SOD1, SOD2 and SOD3 were genotyped using TaqMan Allelic Discrimination. Haplotype analysis was performed on the SNPs in SOD2.

Results: None of the studied SNPs showed an association with risk of cataract. These results were consistent after adding known risk factors (age, sex and smoking) as covariates in the multivariate analyses and after stratification by cataract subtype. Analysis of SOD2 haplotypes did not show any associations with risk of cataract.

Conclusions: If genetic variation in genes encoding SOD-1, SOD-2 and SOD-3 contributes to cataract formation, there is no major contribution of the SNPs analyzed in the present study.

PURPOSE: To compare posterior capsule opacification (PCO) and glistenings 5 to 7 years after cataract surgery with implantation of 2 hydrophobic acrylic intraocular lenses (IOLs) and evaluate the effects on corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA) and contrast sensitivity. SETTING: St. Erik Eye Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden. DESIGN: Randomized clinical trial. METHODS: Cataract surgery with standard phacoemulsification was performed in 1 eye of patients. The patients were randomized to an Acrysof SA60AT (1-piece IOL group) or a Sensar AR40e (3-piece IOL group), both hydrophobic acrylic IOLs with a sharp-edged design. Five to 7 years postoperatively, retroillumination images were obtained and the PCO area and severity (area affected within the capsulorhexis and severity) were evaluated using computer software. High-contrast (100%) and low-contrast (2.5%) CDVAs were measured. The neodymium:YAG laser capsulotomy rates were recorded. Scheimpflug images were obtained to evaluate glistenings, which were graded subjectively at the slitlamp and quantified objectively by digital image analysis using computer software. RESULTS: The study enrolled 80 patients. There were no significant differences in PCO between the 2 groups. The 3-piece IOL group had significantly fewer glistenings (P<.001). There was good correlation between the subjective grading of glistenings and objective computer-processed image grading. The glistenings were not correlated with IOL power, CDVA, or contrast sensitivity. CONCLUSIONS: There were no significant differences in PCO between the 2 acrylic hydrophobic IOLs 5 to 7 years postoperatively. The 1-piece IOL group developed more glistenings than the 3-piece IOL group.

PURPOSE: To compare the pupil dynamics of an intracameral combination of 2 mydriatics and 1 anesthetic (Mydrane) to a standard topical regimen for cataract surgery.

SETTING: Sixty-two centers in Europe and 6 centers in Algeria.

DESIGN: Prospective case series.

METHODS: Pupil size measurements were performed in 2 randomized studies (phase 2 and phase 3) under masked conditions (recorded videography, masked reading center). The outcomes in the phase 2 study supported evaluation of the timeframe to obtain pupil dilation and the phase 3 study provided results on mydriasis stability.

RESULTS: Phase 2 and phase 3 comprised 139 patients and 591 patients, respectively. After intracameral combination administration, 95% of the pupil dilation was achieved within a mean of 28.6 seconds ± 4.6 (SD). At the beginning of capsulorhexis creation, the mean pupil diameter was larger than 7.0 mm in both groups. The intraoperative pupil diameter remained stable in the intracameral combination group and decreased in the topical group. The mean change in pupil size just before capsulorhexis to the end of surgery (just before cefuroxime injection) was -0.22 ± 0.72 mm and -1.67 ± 0.98 mm, respectively. No clinically significant change in pupil diameter (change <1.0 mm) occurred in the majority of the intracameral combination group (89.3%) compared with the topical group (26.8%).

CONCLUSIONS: Intracameral combination of 2 mydriatics and 1 anesthetic is an alternative to topical mydriatics for cataract surgery. The prompt onset of pupil dilation and the stable mydriasis induced by this drug combination improved the intraoperative conditions during crucial steps, such as intraocular lens implantation.

PURPOSE: To quantify the mydriatic effect and side effects of topical lidocaine hydrochloride with different pH values and concentrations in healthy volunteers.

SETTING: Umeå University Hospital Eye Clinic, Umeå, Sweden.

METHODS: In this intraindividual comparison double-masked randomized study, healthy volunteers were given topical lidocaine 8%, lidocaine 8% pH 6.0, or a placebo 3 times at 90-second intervals. Thereafter, a drop of tropicamide 0.5% or placebo was given (tropicamide setting). Another group of healthy volunteers was given topical lidocaine 4%, 8%, or 16% 3 or 6 times at 90-second intervals (dose-response setting). Before and 15, 30, 60, and 180 minutes after eyedrop instillation, the near point was determined and Scheimpflug photography was performed.

RESULTS: The tropicamide setting comprised 26 volunteers (mean age 23.5 years) and the dose-response setting, 10 volunteers (mean age 24.5 years). The direct mydriatic effect of lidocaine was larger at pH 6.0 (mean peak effect 0.61+/-0.06 [SEM] versus 0.42+/-0.04 mm) (P< .05), and the augmentation of tropicamide mydriasis was larger at pH 6.0. Lidocaine 8% had a better direct mydriatic effect than lidocaine 4% and lidocaine 16% (mean peak effect 0.60+/-0.09 mm versus 0.19+/-0.08 mm and 0.28+/-0.10 mm, respectively) (P< .01). Lidocaine 16% given 6 times caused corneal side effects.

CONCLUSIONS: Lidocaine 8% with pH 6.0 had a maximum direct mydriatic effect and gave maximum augmentation of tropicamide mydriasis without causing unwanted corneal side effects and thus should be preferable for topical anesthesia in cataract surgery.

PURPOSE: To assess postoperative intraocular lens (IOL) position in relation to the cornea and iris, compare 2 devices for anterior chamber depth (ACD) measurement, and assess the impact of these factors on postoperative refraction in phacoemulsification. SETTING: Department of Clinical Sciences/Ophthalmology, Umea University Hospital, Umea Sweden. DESIGN: Evaluation of diagnostic test or technology. METHODS: Biometry and measurement of the anterior segment were performed preoperatively and postoperatively with the partial coherence interferometry (PCI)-based IOLMaster and the Pentacam HR Scheimpflug device. Predicted refraction was calculated with ACD estimations according to the Haigis formula and was compared with the actual postoperative refraction. Changes in ACD and the distance between the cornea-iris and the iris-lens/IOL were assessed from Scheimpflug images. The theoretical refractive impact of differences in ACD was calculated. RESULTS: The mean preoperative ACD and refractive prediction error, respectively, was 3.22 mm +/- 0.37 (SD) and 0.41 +/- 0.43 diopters (D) for the PCI device and 3.21 +/- 0.35 mm and 0.41 +/- 0.41 D for the Scheimpflug device; the difference was not statistically significant. The mean ACD, cornea-iris distance, and iris-lens/IOL distance changes were 1.62 +/- 0.38 mm, 0.78 +/- 0.29 mm, and 0.85 +/- 0.27 mm, respectively. The mean predicted refractive outcome from a 1.0 mm difference in ACD was 0.32 D. CONCLUSIONS: No difference was found between the measurement devices. Although the exact postoperative IOL position is difficult to predict, its impact on postoperative refraction was comparatively small compared with the impact of minor corneal curvature or axial length measurement errors.

Purpose: To explore the relationship between acquisition of new spectacles after routine cataract surgery and vision‐related activity limitation (VRAL) postoperatively.

Methods: This cohort study with intervention (survey) included 1329 patients in Sweden who had undergone a second‐eye cataract surgery during March 2013. Data from the Swedish National Cataract Register were used, including evaluations of VRAL through the Catquest‐9SF questionnaire before and 3 months after cataract surgery. Five months after the second‐eye surgery, patients completed another five‐item questionnaire about spectacle use preoperatively and postoperatively including an item on surgeons’ advice about the need for spectacles. These responses were linked to the Rasch‐analysed Catquest‐9SF data to identify correlations with VRAL.

Results: A total of 1239 patients finally participated in the study after excluding those who did not fulfil the inclusion criteria. Patients who were advised about the need for spectacles postoperatively (n = 387) had a greater (p = 0.039) improvement in the postoperative VRAL compared to patients who were not advised (n = 691). Patients who obtained new spectacles postoperatively (n = 512) also had greater improvement (p = 0.032) compared to those who did not (n = 724).

Conclusion: The average improvements in the VRAL after surgery were significantly higher for patients who obtained new distance spectacles postoperatively and for patients who were informed about the need for spectacles by their practitioners.

PURPOSE: To explore patients' obtaining and use of spectacles after routine cataract surgery.

METHODS: The study included 1329 patients who underwent bilateral surgery with the second eye operated during March 2013 at 38 different clinics in Sweden. Five months after the second-eye surgery, patients completed a five-item questionnaire about their spectacle use preoperatively and postoperatively. The responses were linked to data from the registry on multiple variables including postoperative refraction, age and gender.

RESULTS: Of the 387 patients who were advised by their surgeons to obtain distance spectacles postoperatively, most did so (77.3%, n = 299), while of the 691 patients who were not so advised, most did not obtain spectacles (78.9%, n = 545). Nevertheless, almost 50% of patients with both spherical and cylindrical errors exceeding 1 dioptre (D) did not obtain new distance spectacles postoperatively, while about 25% of patients with bilateral emmetropia (spherical error <0.5 D, cylinder <1 D) obtained new distance spectacles postoperatively.

CONCLUSION: Patients' choices regarding obtaining and using new spectacles postoperatively are strongly correlated with advice given by the surgeon about the need for distance correction. The large difference between groups who were and were not advised to obtain spectacles for distance correction was only partially reflected in the postoperative refractive errors. Similarly, the patterns of preoperative spectacle use and gender or age differences did not explain this difference.

PURPOSE: To compare objective refraction using small-zone eccentric laser ray tracing (LRT) wavefront aberrometry to standard autorefraction in keratoconus (KC), and whether the visual acuities achieved with these refractions differ from corresponding values in healthy eyes.

METHODS: Twenty-nine eyes of 29 patients with KC and 29 eyes of 29 healthy controls were included in this prospective unmasked case-control study. The uncorrected (UCVA) and spectacle-corrected (SCVA) Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) visual acuities based on refractions derived from LRT in central and four eccentric zones were compared to those achieved with standard autorefraction. The spherical equivalent (M) and two astigmatic power vectors (C0 and C45) were calculated for all refractions. Pentacam HR(®) was used to generate keratometry readings of the corresponding zones.

RESULTS: In KC, the refraction from the upper nasal zone rendered a higher SCVA than the standard autorefraction more often than in the controls (p < 0.001). There were no significant variation in M between the different LRT measurement points in the control group, but central data provided the best SCVA. The UCVA:s and SCVA:s were worse in KC, and the KC eyes showed inferior myopia and superior hyperopia. Multiple refractions rendered similar SCVA:s in KC. Pentacam HR(®) showed higher keratometry readings infero-temporally, but also lower readings supero-nasally, compared to controls.

CONCLUSION: In KC, eccentric LRT measurements gave better SCVA than standard autorefraction more often than in healthy eyes. Eccentric LRT may become a valuable tool in the demanding task of subjective refraction in KC.

Purpose To investigate the central and paracentral astigmatism and the significance of centration and measurement zone diameter compared to a 3-mm pupil-centred measurement zone in keratoconus and in healthy eyes.

Methods Twenty-eight right eyes from 28 KC patients with an inferotemporal cone were selected according to specified criteria based on Oculus Pentacam HR (R) measurements and were matched with healthy control eyes. The flat (K1) and steep (K2) keratometry readings were registered from the Total Corneal Refractive Power' (TCRP) display as well as the anterior and posterior corneal astigmatism displays (ACA and PCA, respectively). Astigmatic power vectors KP0 and KP45 were calculated and analysed for a 6-mm and two 3-mm zones centred on the corneal apex and the pupil, and for 8 paracentral 3-mm zones.

Results The astigmatism was generally higher in KC. Many astigmatic values in KC differed between the 3-mm pupil-centred and the 3- and 6-mm apex-centred zones in KC. In the controls, no corresponding differences between measurement zones were seen, apart from PCA, which differed. The magnitude and direction of KP0 and KP45 varied greatly between the paracentral measurements in KC.

Conclusion Centration and measurement zone diameter have great impacts on the astigmatic values in KC. A small pupil-centred measurement zone should be considered when evaluating the astigmatism in KC.

Purpose: To evaluate photorefractive intrastromal cross‐linking (PiXL) treatment for low‐grade myopia, comparing three treatment protocols.

Methods: Healthy individuals, 25.6 ± 3.6 years of age, with low‐grade myopia underwent epi‐on PiXL with either: 4‐mm zone treated in high oxygen environment (4 mm‐HIGH; n = 15), 4‐mm/room air (4‐mm LOW; n = 6), or 6‐mm/high oxygen (6‐mm HIGH; n = 6). Efficacy was determined by change in uncorrected visual acuity (UCVA), manifest refractive spherical equivalent (MRSE) and corneal curvature (K_mean) over a 12‐month follow‐up. Safety was determined by best spectacle corrected visual acuity (BSCVA), corneal endothelial cell loss and registration of side‐effects.

Results: Twenty‐seven subjects were included. Due to insufficient effect with the 4‐mm LOW treatment and an unacceptable degree of initial light sensitivity/ocular irritation in the 6‐mm HIGH group, the inclusions to these treatments were stopped after inclusion of 6 patients in each group. The 4‐mm HIGH treatment showed a significantly larger improvement in UCVA (−0.45 ± 0.27 LogMAR) and MRSE (+0.99 ± 0.44 D) at 1, 6 and 12 months compared with the 4‐mm LOW treatment (p < 0.05). At 12 months posttreatment, endothelial cell count and BSCVA were unaltered. More initial side‐effects were noted with the 6‐mm HIGH treatment, compared with the 4‐mm HIGH treatment (p < 0.05).

Conclusion: Epi‐on PiXL may become a safe and effective non‐ablative treatment for low‐grade myopia. The effect is augmented by high oxygen environment and remains stable for 12 months. The initial ocular irritation is acceptable with a 4‐mm treatment zone. The present results justify further clinical studies on PiXL, including refinements of the technique and long‐term results.

Purpose: To analyse the temperature of the corneal surface in keratoconus during corneal customized crosslinking (CXL) with a preserved epithelium (epi-on) under oxygen flow, and epi-off CXL in room air, and to assess the effect of pre-heating the oxygen.

Methods: This masked, intra-individual comparing randomized study included 14 participants with bilateral progressive keratoconus treated with bilateral CXL: one eye with epi-on CXL under a flow of 2.5 L/min oxygen; the fellow eye with epi-off CXL in room air. In a second setting involving 12 healthy participants, room-tempered oxygen was flushed over one eye and oxygen pre-heated to 37°C over the fellow eye. The corneal surface temperature was assessed with infrared photography.

Results: A reduction in corneal surface temperature was seen from the pre-treatment application of topical riboflavin in the epi-off group (−1.1 ± 1.0°C, p < 0.001). The temperature increased during the first half of the CXL treatment in both groups (+0.7 ± 1.2°C, p = 0.041 for epi-on; +0.7 ± 0.9°C, p = 0.023 for epi-off CXL, respectively). In epi-on CXL an overall temperature increase was seen during the treatment (+0.8 ± 1.2°C, p = 0.016). In the second setting, pre-heating the oxygen rendered a surface temperature increase of +1.8 ± 0.2°C (p < 0.001).

Conclusion: In epi-off CXL, the application of topical room-tempered riboflavin decreases the corneal surface temperature, likely due to increased evaporation. A slight temperature increase is seen during CXL with both epi-on and epi-off CXL, albeit far below the corneal safety limit. The corneal temperature can, however, be increased by applying pre-heated oxygen, a possible approach to modify or augment the treatment effect in CXL.

Background: Acute-onset postoperative endophthalmitis after cataract surgery remains a rare but important cause of visual loss. There is no global consensus regarding the optimal strategies for prophylaxis of endophthalmitis and practices vary substantially around the world, especially with respect to the use of intracameral antibiotics. The European Society of Cataract & Refractive Surgeons in a randomized clinical trial (2007) reported an approximately 5-fold reduction in endophthalmitis rates associated with the use of intracameral cefuroxime. Despite this report, the use of intracameral antibiotics has not been universally adopted. Methods: Various endophthalmitis prophylaxis patterns around the world (including the United States, Canada, Australia/New Zealand, Japan, China, India, Indonesia, South Africa, Argentina, Russia, Sweden and Mexico) are compared. Each contributing author was asked to provide similar information, including endophthalmitis rates based on published studies, current practice patterns, and in some cases original survey data. Various methods were used to obtain this information, including literature reviews, expert commentary, and some new survey data not previously published. Results: Many different practice patterns were reported from around the world, specifically with respect to the use of intracameral antibiotics. Conclusion: There is no worldwide consensus regarding endophthalmitis prophylaxis with cataract surgery.

Objective: The objective of this study was to compare systemic exposure to tropicamide/phenylephrine following intracameral or topical administration before cataract surgery.

Patients and methods: Mydriatics exposure was calculated in patients randomized to intracameral fixed combination of mydriatics and anesthetic ([ICMA]: tropicamide 0.02%, phenylephrine 0.31%, and lidocaine 1%, N=271) or mydriatic eye drops ([EDs]: tropicamide 0.5% and phenylephrine 10%, N=283). Additional doses were permitted if required. Mydriatic plasma levels were determined by mass spectrometric HPLC in 15 patients per group before and after administration.

Results: Most ICMA patients (73.6%) received a single dose (200 µL) representing an exposure to tropicamide of 0.04 mg and phenylephrine of 0.62 mg. None of these patients received additional mydriatics. In the control group (three administrations), the exposure was 0.45 (11.3-fold higher than ICMA) and 10.2 (16.5-fold higher) mg. When additional ED was used in this group (9.2% of patients), it was 37.5-fold higher for tropicamide (10 drops, 1.5 mg) and 54.8-fold higher for phenylephrine (10 drops, 34 mg) than the recommended ICMA dose. Tropicamide plasma levels were not detectable at any time point in ICMA patients while it was detectable in all ED patients at 12 and 30 minutes. Phenylephrine was detectable in 14.3% of ICMA patients compared to all ED patients at least at one time point. More ED patients experienced a meaningful increase in blood pressure and/or heart rate (11.2% vs 6.0% of ICMA patients; P=0.03).

Conclusion: Systemic exposure to tropicamide/phenylephrine was lower and cardiovascular (CV) effects were less frequent with ICMA. This could be of particular significance in patients at CV risk.

PURPOSE: To study the incidence, characteristics, and results of retinal detachment (RD) after cataract surgery with a capsule complication.

SETTING: Ten ophthalmic surgery departments in Sweden.

METHODS: In this case-control study, data on cataract surgery cases with a capsule complication (study group) or with no complication (control group) in 2003 were extracted from the Swedish National Cataract Register. Patients with RD during a 3-year follow-up were identified.

RESULTS: The study group comprised 324 patients and the control group, 331 patients. Retinal detachment occurred in 13 study group patients, for a 3-year incidence of 4.0%. In the control group, 1 patient (0.3%) had RD. Multivariate analysis showed an adjusted odds ratio (OR) of 14.8 for RD after capsule complication (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.9-114; P = .01). Subgroup analysis of the study group using a binary logistic regression model showed that male sex (OR, 8.5; 95% CI, 1.7-43.8; P = .001) and lens remnants in the vitreous (OR, 14.4; 95% CI 2.6-78.8; P = .002) were additional risk factors. Axial myopia was significantly associated with an increased risk as a single factor but not as a multiple factor. In general, the final visual outcome for RD after a capsule complication was poor; 3 eyes had a visual acuity of 0.50 or better. Eight eyes (62%) had a final visual acuity worse than 0.10 and 6 eyes, 0.02 or worse.

CONCLUSIONS: The risk for RD after cataract surgery increased significantly when a capsule complication occurred, leading to poor final visual acuity in most cases.

Purpose: To compare the mydriatic effect of intracamerally injected isoprenaline plus phenylephrine to phenylephrine alone and to epinephrine in a porcine eye model, aiming to eventually find the best combination of adrenergic substances for surgical mydriasis in humans.

Methods: In this study, we used 89 intact eyes from newly slaughtered pigs, pretreated with 2.0 mg of intracameral acetylcholine. After waiting 60 seconds for miosis to develop, 0.15 ml 0.3% isoprenaline and 0.15 ml 3.0% phenylephrine were injected sequentially with a 90-second interval in 21 eyes. In another 22 eyes, the same substances were given in the reverse order. In 20 eyes, 0.15 ml of 0.025% epinephrine was injected, and as a negative control 0.15 ml of balanced salt solution was injected in 26 eyes. The pupils were filmed during the treatments, and the mean pupil diameters were measured every 15 seconds from the video recordings.

Results: Phenylephrine injected after isoprenaline had a larger mydriatic effect than epinephrine (p < 0.01). Without isoprenaline pretreatment, the mydriatic effect of phenylephrine was significantly smaller than that of epinephrine (p < 0.05). Isoprenaline also exhibited a small mydriatic effect of its own.

Conclusions: The β-receptor stimulator isoprenaline enhances the mydriatic effect of intracameral phenylephrine, indicating a role for the β-receptor in the mydriatic response. Mydriasis mediated by β-receptors may explain why nonspecific adrenergic stimulators such as epinine and epinephrine can have larger mydriatic effects than the specific α(1) -receptor stimulator phenylephrine.

Purpose:

To investigate the effects of repeated measurements of intraocular pressure (IOP) using Goldmann applanation tonometry (GAT) and applanation resonance tonometry (ART) to identify mechanisms contributing to the expected IOP reduction.

Methods:

A prospective, single-centre study with six healthy volunteers. Consecutive repeated series (six measurements/serie/method) were made alternately on both eyes for 1 hr with oxybuprocaine/fluorescein in the right eye and tetracaine in the left. The left eye was Pentacam((R)) photographed before and repeatedly for 20 min after the IOP measurements. On a separate occasion, the same volunteers received the same amount of anaesthetic drops for 1 hr but without repeated IOP measurements.

Results:

A significant IOP reduction occurred with both ART and GAT in the oxybuprocaine-treated eye, -4.4 mmHg and -3.8 mmHg, respectively and with ART in the tetracaine eye, -2.1 mmHg. There was a significant difference in IOP reduction between the oxybuprocaine and tetracaine eyes with ART. There was a significant drop in anterior chamber volume (ACV) immediately after the IOP measurements, -12.6 mu l that returned to pretrial level after 2 min. After 1 hr of receiving anaesthetic eye drops (without IOP measurements), the IOP decreased significantly in the oxybuprocaine eye for both ART and GAT, -3.1 and -1.7 mmHg, respectively, but not in the tetracaine eye (p = 0.72).

Conclusion:

The IOP reduction cannot be explained solely by aqueous humor being pressed out of the anterior chamber. While significant IOP reduction occurred with both tetracaine and oxybuprocaine after repeated mechanical applanation, the IOP reduction was significantly greater with oxybuprocaine.

PURPOSE: To describe the long-term outcomes after cataract extractions with a capsule rupture included in the Swedish Capsule Rupture Study.

SETTING: Ten ophthalmic surgery departments in Sweden.

METHODS: From the cohort of patients originally selected for inclusion in the Swedish Capsule Rupture Study, cases with a capsule complication (study group) and cases without a complication (control group) were examined approximately 3.5 years postoperatively. Visual acuity and objective and subjective parameters were registered.

RESULTS: The study group comprised 171 patients and the control group, 198 patients. Patients with a capsule complication had a significantly worse visual outcome and a doubled risk for no improvement in preoperative visual acuity. Pupil distortion, iris damage, synechias, and subjective complaints related to the eye were significantly more common in patients with a capsule complication.

CONCLUSION: Capsule complications decreased the probability of good postoperative visual acuity and in general yielded a worse long-term outcome after phacoemulsification surgery