Umeå universitets logga

umu.sePublikationer
Ändra sökning
Avgränsa sökresultatet
1 - 15 av 15
RefereraExporteraLänk till träfflistan
Permanent länk
Referera
Referensformat
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Annat format
Fler format
Språk
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Annat språk
Fler språk
Utmatningsformat
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Träffar per sida
  • 5
  • 10
  • 20
  • 50
  • 100
  • 250
Sortering
  • Standard (Relevans)
  • Författare A-Ö
  • Författare Ö-A
  • Titel A-Ö
  • Titel Ö-A
  • Publikationstyp A-Ö
  • Publikationstyp Ö-A
  • Äldst först
  • Nyast först
  • Skapad (Äldst först)
  • Skapad (Nyast först)
  • Senast uppdaterad (Äldst först)
  • Senast uppdaterad (Nyast först)
  • Disputationsdatum (tidigaste först)
  • Disputationsdatum (senaste först)
  • Standard (Relevans)
  • Författare A-Ö
  • Författare Ö-A
  • Titel A-Ö
  • Titel Ö-A
  • Publikationstyp A-Ö
  • Publikationstyp Ö-A
  • Äldst först
  • Nyast först
  • Skapad (Äldst först)
  • Skapad (Nyast först)
  • Senast uppdaterad (Äldst först)
  • Senast uppdaterad (Nyast först)
  • Disputationsdatum (tidigaste först)
  • Disputationsdatum (senaste först)
Markera
Maxantalet träffar du kan exportera från sökgränssnittet är 250. Vid större uttag använd dig av utsökningar.
  • 1.
    Fernandez, Naiara
    et al.
    Helmholtz Centre Potsdam GFZ German Research Centre for Geosciences, Section 4.5 – Basin Modelling, Potsdam, Germany .
    Scheck-Wenderoth, Magdalena
    Helmholtz Centre Potsdam GFZ German Research Centre for Geosciences, Section 4.5 – Basin Modelling, Potsdam, Germany; RWTH Aachen, Faculty of Georesources and Material Engineering, Aachen, Germany.
    Bott, Judith
    Helmholtz Centre Potsdam GFZ German Research Centre for Geosciences, Section 4.5 – Basin Modelling, Potsdam, Germany .
    Cacace, Mauro
    Helmholtz Centre Potsdam GFZ German Research Centre for Geosciences, Section 4.5 – Basin Modelling, Potsdam, Germany .
    Gholamrezaie, Ershad
    Umeå universitet, Samhällsvetenskapliga fakulteten, Institutionen för informatik.
    Insights into the 3D lithospheric structure below the Sea of Marmara region from seismic tomography and forward gravity modeling2022Ingår i: EGU General Assembly 2022: Session programme, 2022, artikel-id EGU22-5475Konferensbidrag (Refereegranskat)
    Abstract [en]

    The North Anatolian Fault Zone (NAFZ) extends for about 1500 km in the Eastern Mediterranean region, from eastern Anatolia to the northern Aegean. The NAFZ is characterized by strong and frequent seismic activity, increasing the seismic hazard in the region. In the Sea of Marmara area (NW Turkey), the North Anatolian Fault splits into three main branches. The northern branch of the fault, the Main Marmara Fault (MMF), has produced several major earthquakes (M7+) in the past, with a recurrence time of about 250 years. At present, there is a 150 km seismic gap along the MMF which has not ruptured since 1766. The observed fault segmentation, with creeping and locked segments, is indicative of along-strike variability in the fault strength along the seismic gap.

    Previous modeling studies in the Sea of Marmara have revealed how crustal heterogeneities effectively affect the thermal and mechanical states of the lithosphere and can likely explain the observed fault segmentation in the area. Therefore, constraining the 3D structure of the deeper crust and upper mantle below the Sea of Marmara is crucial to better assess the mechanical stability of the fault and the possible seismic hazards in the area. In this study, we make use of seismic tomography models and forward gravity modelling to gain insights into the 3D lithospheric structure below the Sea of Marmara. Two tomographic models are used to compute a 3D density model of the area relying on two distinct approaches for the crust and the lithospheric mantle. The results showcase a heterogeneous and rather complex crustal density distribution in the study area[m1] . The 3D density distributions are used in a second step to forward model the gravity response. The results from this new tomography-constrained 3D gravity modelling are then compared to published gravity data and iteratively corrected to fit the overall gravity signals. The final 3D lithospheric-scale density model of the study area will be the basis for thermo-mechanical modeling experiments aimed at improving our current understanding of the present-day geomechanical state of the Sea of Marmara and the MMF and its implications for the seismic hazard of the region.

  • 2.
    Fernandez, Naiara
    et al.
    Helmholtz Centre Potsdam GFZ—German Research Centre for Geosciences Potsdam Germany.
    Scheck‐Wenderoth, Magdalena
    Helmholtz Centre Potsdam GFZ—German Research Centre for Geosciences Potsdam Germany; Institute of Applied Geosciences Technische Universität Berlin Berlin Germany.
    Cacace, Mauro
    Helmholtz Centre Potsdam GFZ—German Research Centre for Geosciences Potsdam Germany.
    Gholamrezaie, Ershad
    Umeå universitet, Humanistiska fakulteten, Institutionen för idé- och samhällsstudier. Helmholtz Centre Potsdam, GFZ—German Research Centre for Geosciences, Potsdam, Germany.
    The inherited crustal structure and lithospheric thermal field beneath the Sea of Marmara (NW Türkiye): observations from 3D gravity modeling and seismic tomography analysis2024Ingår i: Journal of Geophysical Research - Solid Earth, ISSN 2169-9313, E-ISSN 2169-9356, Vol. 129, nr 12, artikel-id e2024JB030336Artikel i tidskrift (Refereegranskat)
    Abstract [en]

    The North Anatolian Fault (NAF) extends for over 1,000 km across Türkiye and poses significant seismic hazard in the region. The Main Marmara Fault (MMF) segment of the NAF in the Sea of Marmara (NW Türkiye), exhibits along‐strike segmentation in its interseismic strain accumulation. Constraining the lithospheric configuration below the MMF is critical to understand its segmentation and assessing seismic hazard in the area. We present a new 3D lithospheric‐scale density of the Sea of Marmara, that combines gravity modeling and seismic tomography analysis. Using forward and inverse gravity modeling with free‐air gravity data and available constraints of geological units we derived the intra‐crustal density structure. Shear‐wave velocity tomography models provided insights into the temperature and density configuration of the uppermost mantle, and the geometry of the 1330°C isotherm. Our results highlight significant crustal density variations: lower‐density crust in the Sakarya Zone and Strandja Massif, and denser crust below the Istanbul Zone, which overlies a relatively hotter lithospheric mantle. This lithospheric configuration reflects both ongoing tectonic processes and inheritance from past geological events, including the drifting of the Istanbul Zone crustal blockand the signature of past subduction events. The extent of the Istanbul Zone denser crust spatially correlates with the locked segment of the MMF. The bimaterial nature of the fault segment likely influences its interseismic and coseismic behavior. The denser, stiffer Istanbul Zone crust would promote interseismically locked conditions in contrast to the adjacent, more compliant crustal block and could result in asymmetric rupture with a preferred directivity.

    Ladda ner fulltext (pdf)
    fulltext
  • 3.
    Gholamrezaie, Ershad
    et al.
    Umeå universitet, Humanistiska fakulteten, Institutionen för idé- och samhällsstudier.
    Buckland, Philip I.
    Umeå universitet, Humanistiska fakulteten, Institutionen för idé- och samhällsstudier.
    Mähler, Roger
    Umeå universitet, Humanistiska fakulteten, Humlab.
    von Boer, Johan
    Umeå universitet, Humanistiska fakulteten, Humlab.
    Weegar, Rebecka
    Umeå universitet, Humanistiska fakulteten, Humlab. Umeå universitet, Humanistiska fakulteten, Institutionen för idé- och samhällsstudier, Miljöarkeologiska laboratoriet.
    Sjölander, Mattias
    Umeå universitet, Humanistiska fakulteten, Institutionen för idé- och samhällsstudier, Miljöarkeologiska laboratoriet.
    Engqvist, Carl-Erik
    Umeå universitet, Humanistiska fakulteten, Humlab.
    A swedish national infrastructure for interdisciplinary environmental research integrating archaeological and quaternary geological data2024Ingår i: EGU General Assebly 2024: Programme, 2024, artikel-id EGU24-15957Konferensbidrag (Refereegranskat)
    Ladda ner fulltext (pdf)
    fulltext
  • 4.
    Gholamrezaie, Ershad
    et al.
    Helmholtz Centre Potsdam GFZ German Research Centre for Geosciences, Section 4.5 – Basin Modelling, Potsdam, Germany; Institute of Geosciences, University of Potsdam, Potsdam, Germany.
    Scheck-Wenderoth, Magdalena
    Helmholtz Centre Potsdam GFZ German Research Centre for Geosciences, Section 4.5 – Basin Modelling, Potsdam, Germany; Faculty of Georesources and Material Engineering, RWTH Aachen, Aachen, Germany.
    Bott, Judith
    Helmholtz Centre Potsdam GFZ German Research Centre for Geosciences, Section 4.5 – Basin Modelling, Potsdam, Germany .
    Heidbach, Oliver
    Helmholtz Centre Potsdam GFZ German Research Centre for Geosciences, Potsdam, Germany .
    Bohnhoff, Marco
    Helmholtz Centre Potsdam GFZ German Research Centre for Geosciences, Potsdam, Germany .
    Strecker, Manfred R.
    Institute of Geosciences, University of Potsdam, Potsdam, Germany.
    3-D lithospheric-scale rheological model of the Sea of Marmara2020Ingår i: EGU General Assembly 2020: Session programme, 2020, artikel-id EGU2020-4264Konferensbidrag (Refereegranskat)
    Abstract [en]

    The North Anatolian Fault (NAF) below the Sea of Marmara, also known as the Main Marmara Fault (MMF), has repeatedly produced major (M>7) earthquakes in the past. Currently, the MMF corresponds to a seismic gap between the locus of the most recent M>7 ruptures of the 1912 Ganos (M 7.3) and 1999 Izmit (M 7.4) earthquakes. This seismic gap has a recurrence time of approximately 250 years and has not ruptured since 1766. Consequently, it poses a major seismic hazard to the Marmara region, including the megacity Istanbul. The Marmara seismic gap is considered to be locked in the eastern and central segments of the MMF, while the western segment is partly creeping. In the context of seismic hazard and risk assessment, one of the main questions is, if either the Marmara seismic gap will rupture in a single large earthquake or in several ones due to segmentation along the MMF. In part this depends on the physical properties of the lithosphere below the Sea of Marmara as they are a key control of the contemporary stress state. To contribute to this discussion, we present 3‑D lithospheric-scale thermal and rheological models of the Sea of Marmara. These models are based on published 3‑D density models that indicate lateral and vertical crustal heterogeneities below the Sea of Marmara (Gholamrezaie et al., 2019). The density models consist of two layers of sediments, upper and lower crystalline crustal layers, and two crustal dome-shaped, high-density bodies that spatially correlate with major bends along the MMF. We show that these crustal heterogeneities may cause the lithospheric strength to vary significantly along the MMF, supporting the hypothesis that the fault is mechanically segmented. In addition, our results indicate a spatial correlation between observed aseismic fault patches (Wollin et al., 2018) and the location of the high-density bodies. These bodies are colder and stronger than the surrounding crystalline crust, and may thus represent the lateral bounds of the locked MMF segment.

  • 5.
    Gholamrezaie, Ershad
    et al.
    GFZ German Research Centre for Geosciences, Telegrafenberg, Potsdam, Germany; Institute of Earth and Environmental Science, University of Potsdam, Potsdam, Germany.
    Scheck-Wenderoth, Magdalena
    GFZ German Research Centre for Geosciences, Telegrafenberg, Potsdam, Germany; Faculty of Georesources and Materials Engineering, RWTH Aachen, Aachen, Germany.
    Bott, Judith
    GFZ German Research Centre for Geosciences, Telegrafenberg, Potsdam, Germany.
    Heidbach, Oliver
    GFZ German Research Centre for Geosciences, Telegrafenberg, Potsdam, Germany.
    Strecker, Manfred R.
    Institute of Earth and Environmental Science, University of Potsdam, Potsdam, Germany.
    3-D crustal density model of the Sea of Marmara2019Ingår i: Solid Earth, ISSN 1869-9510, E-ISSN 1869-9529, Vol. 10, nr 3, s. 785-807Artikel i tidskrift (Refereegranskat)
    Abstract [en]

    The Sea of Marmara, in northwestern Turkey, is a transition zone where the dextral North Anatolian Fault zone (NAFZ) propagates westward from the Anatolian Plate to the Aegean Sea Plate. The area is of interest in the context of seismic hazard of Istanbul, a metropolitan area with about 15 million inhabitants. Geophysical observations indicate that the crust is heterogeneous beneath the Marmara basin, but a detailed characterization of the crustal heterogeneities is still missing. To assess if and how crustal heterogeneities are related to the NAFZ segmentation below the Sea of Marmara, we develop new crustal-scale 3-D density models which integrate geological and seismological data and that are additionally constrained by 3-D gravity modeling. For the latter, we use two different gravity datasets including global satellite data and local marine gravity observation. Considering the two different datasets and the general non-uniqueness in potential field modeling, we suggest three possible “end-member” solutions that are all consistent with the observed gravity field and illustrate the spectrum of possible solutions. These models indicate that the observed gravitational anomalies originate from significant density heterogeneities within the crust. Two layers of sediments, one syn-kinematic and one pre-kinematic with respect to the Sea of Marmara formation are underlain by a heterogeneous crystalline crust. A felsic upper crystalline crust (average density of 2720 kg m−3) and an intermediate to mafic lower crystalline crust (average density of 2890 kg m−3) appear to be cross-cut by two large, dome-shaped mafic high-density bodies (density of 2890 to 3150 kg m−3) of considerable thickness above a rather uniform lithospheric mantle (3300 kg m−3). The spatial correlation between two major bends of the main Marmara fault and the location of the high-density bodies suggests that the distribution of lithological heterogeneities within the crust controls the rheological behavior along the NAFZ and, consequently, maybe influences fault segmentation and thus the seismic hazard assessment in the region.

    Ladda ner fulltext (pdf)
    fulltext
  • 6.
    Gholamrezaie, Ershad
    et al.
    Helmholtz Centre Potsdam GFZ German Research Centre for Geosciences, Section 4.5 – Basin Modelling, Potsdam, Germany; Institute of Earth and Environmental Science, University of Potsdam, Germany .
    Scheck-Wenderoth, Magdalena
    Helmholtz Centre Potsdam GFZ German Research Centre for Geosciences, Section 4; Faculty of Georesources and Material Engineering, RWTH Aachen, Aachen, Germany.5 – Basin Modelling, Potsdam, Germany; .
    Bott, Judith
    Helmholtz Centre Potsdam GFZ German Research Centre for Geosciences, Section 4.5 – Basin Modelling, Potsdam, Germany .
    Heidbach, Oliver
    Helmholtz Centre Potsdam GFZ German Research Centre for Geosciences, Potsdam, Germany .
    Strecker, Manfred R.
    Institute of Earth and Environmental Science, University of Potsdam, Germany.
    The lithospheric strength along the Main Marmara Fault based on 3D density and thermal modelling2019Ingår i: Geophysical Research Abstracts, European Geosciences Union (EGU), 2019, Vol. 21, artikel-id EGU2019-13065Konferensbidrag (Refereegranskat)
    Abstract [en]

    In Northwest Anatolia, the dextral North Anatolian Fault Zone (NAFZ) goes through the Sea of Marmara and creates a section which is known as the Main Marmara Fault (MMF). Due to the NAFZ activity, the Marmara regionis a major earthquake zone. This area hosts the Megacity of Istanbul in the vicinity of a seismic gap (∼ 150 kmlong) in the MMF which has not ruptured since 1766. There is an ongoing controversial debate regarding the causeof the seismic gap and if either the fault is locked to a certain depth or is creeping. The main question is if the faultis geomechanically segmented or if the energy will be released over a big single rupture surface. To contribute tothis discussion a detailed description and understanding of the lithosphere thermomechanical behaviour below theSea of Marmara is key. In this study, we present 3D lithospheric-scale thermal and rheological models of the Sea ofMarmara. These models are based on a 3D density model which is obtained from geological and geophysical dataintegration and constrained by gravity modelling. Accordingly, the lithosphere structure consists of six major layers. Two layers of syn- and pre-kinematic sediments with respect to the Sea of Marmara formation with an averagedensity (ρ) of 2000 and 2490 kg.m−3, respectively. These sediments rest on a heterogeneous crust including a felsicupper crystalline crust (ρ = 2720 kg.m−3) and an intermediate to mafic lower crystalline crust (ρ = 2890 kg.m−3).The crystalline crustal units are crosscut by two thick dome-shaped mafic high-density bodies (ρ = 3050 kg.m−3),that spatially correlate with the bending segments of the MMF. Beneath these layers is a homogeneous lithosphericmantle (ρ = 3300 kg.m−3) down to the thermal Lithosphere-Asthenosphere boundary (LAB). Along the MMF,the thermomechanical model generally indicates that the brittle-ductile transition zone occurs within the uppercrystalline crust at a depth of around 18 km b.s.l, which is consistent with the 1999 Izmit earthquake. In contrast,the thermomechanical model indicates that the high-density bodies are colder and stronger than the surroundingcrystalline units. Consequently, the brittle-ductile transition zone occurs, closer to the Moho discontinuity, at thedepth around 23 km b.s.l. In conclusion, these results suggest that crustal heterogeneities significantly affect therheological behaviour of the MMF, and support the hypothesis that the fault is geomechanically segmented.

  • 7.
    Gholamrezaie, Ershad
    et al.
    Helmholtz Centre Potsdam GFZ German Research Centre for Geosciences, Section 4.5 – Basin Modelling, Potsdam, Germany; Institute of Geosciences, University of Potsdam, Germany.
    Scheck-Wenderoth, Magdalena
    Helmholtz Centre Potsdam GFZ German Research Centre for Geosciences, Section 4.5 – Basin Modelling, Potsdam, Germany; Faculty of Georesources and Material Engineering, RWTH Aachen, Aachen, Germany .
    Cacace, Mauro
    Helmholtz Centre Potsdam GFZ German Research Centre for Geosciences, Section 4.5 – Basin Modelling, Potsdam, Germany .
    Bott, Judith
    Helmholtz Centre Potsdam GFZ German Research Centre for Geosciences, Section 4.5 – Basin Modelling, Potsdam, Germany .
    Heidbach, Oliver
    Helmholtz Centre Potsdam–GFZ German Research Centre for Geosciences, Potsdam, Germany.
    Bohnhoff, Marco
    Helmholtz Centre Potsdam–GFZ German Research Centre for Geosciences, Potsdam, Germany; Department of Earth Sciences, Freie University Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
    Strecker, Manfred R.
    Institute of Geosciences, University of Potsdam, Germany.
    Lithospheric strength variations and seismotectonic segmentation below the Sea of Marmara2021Ingår i: Tectonophysics, ISSN 0040-1951, E-ISSN 1879-3266, Vol. 815, artikel-id 228999Artikel i tidskrift (Refereegranskat)
    Abstract [en]

    The Sea of Marmara is a tectonically active basin that straddles the North Anatolian Fault Zone (NAFZ), a major strike-slip fault that separates the Eurasian and Anatolian tectonic plates. The Main Marmara Fault (MMF), which is part of the NAFZ, contains an approximately 150 km long seismotectonic segment that has not ruptured since 1766. A key question for seismic hazard and risk assessment is whether or not the next rupture along this segment is likely to produce one major earthquake or a series of smaller earthquakes. Geomechanical characteristics such as along-strike variations in rock strength may provide an important control on seismotectonic segmentation. We find that variations in lithospheric strength throughout the Marmara region control the mechanical segmentation of the MMF and help explain its long-term seismotectonic segmentation. In particular, a strong crust that is mechanically coupled to the upper mantle spatially correlates with aseismic patches, where the MMF bends and changes its strike in response to the presence of high-density lower crustal bodies. Between the bends, mechanically weaker crustal domains that are decoupled from the mantle indicate a predominance of creeping. These results are highly relevant for the ongoing debate regarding the characteristics of the Marmara seismic gap, especially in view of the seismic hazard (Mw > 7) in the densely populated Marmara region.

  • 8.
    Gholamrezaie, Ershad
    et al.
    Helmholtz Centre Potsdam GFZ German Research Centre for Geosciences, Potsdam, Germany; Helmholtz Centre Potsdam–GFZ German Research Centre for Geosciences, Postdam, Germany.
    Scheck-Wenderoth, Magdalena
    Helmholtz Centre Potsdam GFZ German Research Centre for Geosciences, Potsdam, Germany; Faculty of Georesources and Material Engineering, RWTH Aachen, Aachen, Germany.
    Heidbach, Oliver
    Helmholtz Centre Potsdam GFZ German Research Centre for Geosciences, Potsdam, Germany .
    3D structural model of the Sea of Marmara2018Ingår i: EGU General Assembly 2018: Session programme, 2018, artikel-id EGU2018-10434-1Konferensbidrag (Refereegranskat)
    Abstract [en]

    The North Anatolian Fault Zone (NAFZ) is one of the most famous active strike-slip fault system which is plateboundary between the Anatolian block and the Eurasian plate. The relative plate motion is about 2.5 [cm/a] andthe NAFZ has a length of 1100 km. In its western part, the fault cut through the Sea of Marmara. In this area,basins have been evolving due to the NAFZ in a complex transitional setting. This region represents a seismic gapin the NAFZ where is close to the Megacity of Istanbul with more than 12 million inhabitants.

    Comprehension and detailed description of the geological structure in the Sea of Marmara are essentialkeys to understanding the tectonic processes and geodynamic evolution. In particular, the structural setting isprobably the control for segmentation of the seismic faults and would determine the maximum possible earthquakemagnitude to be expected south of Istanbul in the seismic gap east of the Bay of Izmit where 1999 the last majorearthquake hit the region and which has not ruptured since 1766 over a length of app. 150 km.

    In this study, we integrate different geological and geophysical data such as existing structural models,well data, seismic observations and gravity to build a new 3D lithospheric-scale structural model which isadditionally constrained by 3D gravity modeling. The 3D gravity field indicates significant density heterogeneitiesin the crystalline crust. We have tested different crustal configurations to find the best fit to the observed gravityfield.

    The final 3D structural model suggests that the gravitational anomalies are mostly due to the density contrasts in the upper-middle crust rather than due to the presence of a high-density lower crustal body or the Mohodepth. The derived density structure indicates lithological heterogeneities within the crust that may result indifferent rheological behavior along the NAFZ. This could potentially have an impact on the rupture propagationand segmentation of the fault system.

  • 9.
    Gholamrezaie, Ershad
    et al.
    Helmholtz Centre Potsdam GFZ German Research Centre for Geosciences, Potsdam, Germany; University of Potsdam, Potsdam, Germany.
    Scheck-Wenderoth, Magdalena
    Helmholtz Centre Potsdam GFZ German Research Centre for Geosciences, Potsdam, Germany; RWTH Aachen University, Aachen, Germany.
    Heidbach, Oliver
    Helmholtz Centre Potsdam GFZ German Research Centre for Geosciences, Potsdam, Germany .
    3D structure and conductive thermal field of the sea of Marmara2017Ingår i: EGU General Assembly 2017: Session programme, 2017, artikel-id EGU2017-12710Konferensbidrag (Refereegranskat)
    Abstract [en]

    The Sea of Marmara and its basins mainly evolved due to the activities of the Thrace-Eskisehir Fault Zone (TEFZ)in Neogene and the North Anatolian Fault Zone (NAFZ) in Quaternary. At present-day, the Sea of Marmara is stillevolving due to the NAFZ and the Marmara region is an earthquake danger zone while hosting around 20 million ofinhabitants. For a better understanding of the tectonic processes and geodynamic evolution, it is important to modelthe geological structure and the thermal field of this region. The aim of this study is to build a 3D lithospheric-scalestructural model and a 3D conductive thermal model for the Sea of Marmara and including its adjacent onshoreareas. Therefore, we integrate different geological and geophysical data such as existing structural models, welldata, seismic observations and gravity to build a new 3D lithospheric-scale structural model which is additionallyconstrained by 3D gravity modeling. The final 3D structural model differentiates various sedimentary, crustal andmantle units and is the base for the 3D thermal field calculation. The 3D conductive thermal model is a numerical solution to the Fourier’s law equation in steady-state condition and considering the thermal properties of thecorresponding structural model. Our 3D lithospheric-scale models of the geological structure and the conductivethermal field are the key points for further general research and useful particularly for mechanical modeling, considering variations in rheology and strength of the lithosphere in the Marmara region. In addition, our results haveapplication in geo-resources exploration and would be helpful in risk management and hazard mitigation.

  • 10.
    Gholamrezaie, Ershad
    et al.
    Helmholtz Centre Potsdam GFZ German Research Centre for Geosciences, Potsdam, Germany .
    Scheck-Wenderoth, Magdalena
    Helmholtz Centre Potsdam GFZ German Research Centre for Geosciences, Potsdam, Germany .
    Sippel, Judith
    Helmholtz Centre Potsdam GFZ German Research Centre for Geosciences, Potsdam, Germany .
    Shallow thermal field variations across continental volcanic passive margins that significantly contrast in the breakup age2017Konferensbidrag (Refereegranskat)
    Abstract [en]

    The aim of this research is to analyze the variations of the shallow thermal field across two volcanic continental passive margins contrasting in the breakup age; the Southwest (SW) African margin and the Norwegian margin. The SW African passive margin is significantly (around 75 Ma) older than the Norwegian. By comparing these two differently aged passive volcanic margins, we test the hypothesis if the present-day thermal field is different for the two settings. In this regard, we consider two previously published 3D lithospheric-scale and conductive thermal models for the SW African and the Norwegian passive margins. To compare these thermal models, we respect the surface of the upper thermal boundary as a reference surface for the both models and subsequently extract the temperature-depth distribution in a certain depth (1 km) interval down to 6 km below the upper thermal boundary surface. Finally, we calculate the geothermal gradient for the two settings at 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 and 6 km below the surface of the upper thermal boundary. We interpret the geothermal gradient variations concerning the 3D geological structural models to show how radiogenic heat production, sediment thermal blanketing, and the Lithosphere-Asthenosphere Boundary (LAB) depth play the major roles in the shallow thermal field pattern. Our results indicate that the shallow thermal field con-siderably differs comparing the two margins. In the Nor-wegian margin, the thermal field is mostly dominated by the lithosphere age. In contrast, over the SW African passive margin, the crustal configuration is dominating the pattern of the equilibrated shallow thermal field.

  • 11.
    Gholamrezaie, Ershad
    et al.
    Helmholtz Centre Potsdam GFZ German Research Centre for Geosciences, Potsdam, Germany .
    Scheck-Wenderoth, Magdalena
    Helmholtz Centre Potsdam GFZ German Research Centre for Geosciences, Potsdam, Germany .
    Sippel, Judith
    Helmholtz Centre Potsdam GFZ German Research Centre for Geosciences, Potsdam, Germany .
    Variability of geothermal gradients across two differently aged continental passive margins: The Southwest African and the Norwegian margins2016Konferensbidrag (Refereegranskat)
    Abstract [en]

     The sedimentary basin infill of continental passive margins is considered as geo-reactors with temperature-related physical and chemical processes. The aim of this study is to derive regional variations in geothermal gradient at depth for two differently aged passive margins and to explore the controlling factors for these variations. Hence, we analyzed two previously published 3D conductive and lithospheric-scale thermal models of the Southwest (SW) African and the Norwegian passive margins. These 3D models differentiate various sedimentary, crustal and mantle units and integrate different geophysical data such as seismic observations and the gravity field. We extracted the temperature-depth distributions in 1 km intervals down to 6 km below the upper thermal boundary condition (UBC). The geothermal gradient was then calculated for these intervals between the UBC and the respective depth levels (1, 2, 3, 4, 5, and 6 km below the UBC). According to our results, the geothermal gradient decreases with increasing depth and shows different trends and values for these two different margins. It has the least lateral variations over the area at 6 km below the UBC by a range of 16°C/km for the SW African margin and 26°C/km for the Norwegian margin. In the onshore parts of the SW African margins (variably covered by sediments) the geothermal gradient differs by 28-34°C/km and varies with depth. In contrast, the Norwegian onshore domains (with outcropping basement) show a variation as low as 15-17°C/km throughout the different depth intervals. Offshore, at the Norwegian margin, the geothermal gradient increases oceanward. However, at the SW African margin, the geothermal gradient declines from the sedimentary basins towards the distal parts of the shelf and reaches the minimum value in the oceanic crustal domain. These results indicate the ongoing process of oceanic mantle cooling at the young Norwegian margin compared with the old SW African passive margin that seems to be thermally equilibrated.

  • 12.
    Gholamrezaie, Ershad
    et al.
    Institute of Earth and Environmental Science, University of Potsdam, Karl-Liebknecht-Str. 24–25, 14476 Potsdam-Golm, Germany; GFZ German Research Centre for Geosciences, Section 6.1, Telegrafenberg, 14473 Potsdam, Germany .
    Scheck-Wenderoth, Magdalena
    Helmholtz Centre Potsdam GFZ German Research Centre for Geosciences, Potsdam, Germany; Faculty of Georesources and Material Engineering, RWTH Aachen, Aachen, Germany .
    Sippel, Judith
    Helmholtz Centre Potsdam GFZ German Research Centre for Geosciences, Potsdam, Germany .
    Strecker, Manfred R.
    Institute of Earth and Environmental Science, University of Potsdam, Potsdam, Germany.
    Variability of the geothermal gradient across two differently aged magma-rich continental rifted margins of the Atlantic Ocean: the Southwest African and the Norwegian margins2018Ingår i: Solid Earth, ISSN 1869-9510, E-ISSN 1869-9529, Vol. 9, nr 1, s. 139-158Artikel i tidskrift (Refereegranskat)
    Abstract [en]

    The aim of this study is to investigate the shallow thermal field differences for two differently aged passive continental margins by analyzing regional variations in geothermal gradient and exploring the controlling factors for these variations. Hence, we analyzed two previously published 3-D conductive and lithospheric-scale thermal models of the Southwest African and the Norwegian passive margins. These 3-D models differentiate various sedimentary, crustal, and mantle units and integrate different geophysical data such as seismic observations and the gravity field. We extracted the temperature–depth distributions in 1 km intervals down to 6 km below the upper thermal boundary condition. The geothermal gradient was then calculated for these intervals between the upper thermal boundary condition and the respective depth levels (1, 2, 3, 4, 5, and 6 km below the upper thermal boundary condition). According to our results, the geothermal gradient decreases with increasing depth and shows varying lateral trends and values for these two different margins. We compare the 3-D geological structural models and the geothermal gradient variations for both thermal models and show how radiogenic heat production, sediment insulating effect, and thermal lithosphere–asthenosphere boundary (LAB) depth influence the shallow thermal field pattern. The results indicate an ongoing process of oceanic mantle cooling at the young Norwegian margin compared with the old SW African passive margin that seems to be thermally equilibrated in the present day.

  • 13.
    Pilotto, Francesca
    et al.
    Norwegian Institute for Nature Research – NINA .
    Gholamrezaie, Ershad
    Umeå universitet, Humanistiska fakulteten, Institutionen för idé- och samhällsstudier, Miljöarkeologiska laboratoriet. Umeå universitet, Humanistiska fakulteten, Humlab.
    Weegar, Rebecka
    Umeå universitet, Humanistiska fakulteten, Humlab. Umeå universitet, Humanistiska fakulteten, Institutionen för idé- och samhällsstudier, Miljöarkeologiska laboratoriet.
    Rojas, Alexis
    University of Helsinky .
    Buckland, Philip I.
    Umeå universitet, Humanistiska fakulteten, Institutionen för idé- och samhällsstudier, Miljöarkeologiska laboratoriet. Umeå universitet, Humanistiska fakulteten, Humlab.
    Biodiversity shifts: data-driven insights from modern ecology, archaeology, and quaternary sciences2024Konferensbidrag (Övrigt vetenskapligt)
    Abstract [en]

    To understand the implications of past changes in climate, landscape and human activity on contemporary biodiversity patterns, data from modern and palaeoecological studies must be connected. The Strategic Environmental Archaeology Database (SEAD) provides access to big data from archaeology and Quaternary science and is an enormous potential resource for investigating past changes in biodiversity. By linking SEAD to SBDI, past species distributions can be analysed for their implications for landscape and climate change. Recent macroecological research using SEAD/ SBDI illustrates trends in Late Holocene anthropogenic landscape change in north-western Europe. Over the past few thousand years, humans have impacted insect biodiversity as much as climate change did after the last Ice Age. This demonstrates that data from archaeology, and the consequences of human activity, are essential for fulfilling the promi- se of using data driven ecology for guiding future conservation practices in response to climate change. 

  • 14.
    Scheck-Wenderoth, Magdalena
    et al.
    Helmholtz Centre Potsdam GFZ German Research Centre for Geosciences, Section 4.5 – Basin Modelling, Potsdam, Germany; RWTH Aachen University, Aachen, Germany.
    Bott, Judith
    Helmholtz Centre Potsdam GFZ German Research Centre for Geosciences, Section 4.5 – Basin Modelling, Potsdam, Germany .
    Cacace, Mauro
    Helmholtz Centre Potsdam GFZ German Research Centre for Geosciences, Section 4.5 – Basin Modelling, Potsdam, Germany .
    Anikiev, Denis
    Helmholtz Centre Potsdam–GFZ German Research Centre for Geosciences, Potsdam, Germany.
    Gomez Dacal, Maria Laura
    Helmholtz Centre Potsdam GFZ German Research Centre for Geosciences, Section 4.5 – Basin Modelling, Potsdam, Germany .
    Spooner, Cameron
    Helmholtz Centre Potsdam–GFZ German Research Centre for Geosciences, Potsdam, Germany; University of Potsdam, Potsdam, Germany.
    Gholamrezaie, Ershad
    Helmholtz Centre Potsdam - GFZ German Research Centre for Geosciences; Potsdam, Germany; University of Potsdam, Potsdam, Germany.
    Thermal signature of the lithosphere below sedimentary basins in extensional, compressive and transform settings2020Ingår i: EGU General Assembly 2020: Session programme, 2020, artikel-id EGU2020-22518Konferensbidrag (Refereegranskat)
    Abstract [en]

    The configuration of the lithosphere below sedimentary basins varies in response to the basin-forming mechanism, the lifetime of the causative stress fields and the lithological heterogeneity inherited from pre-basin tectonic events. Accordingly, the deep thermal configuration is a function of the tectonic setting, the time since the thermal disturbance occurred and the internal heat sources within the lithosphere. We compare deep thermal configurations in different settings based on data-constrained 3D lithosphere-scale thermal models that consider both geological and geophysical observations and physical processes of heat transfer. The results presented come from a varied range of tectonic settings including: (1) the extensional settings of the Upper Rhine Graben and the East African Rift System, where we show that rifts can be hot for different reasons; (2) the North and South Atlantic passive margins, demonstrating that magma-rich passive margins can be comparatively hot or cold depending on the thermo-tectonic age; (3) the Alps, where we find that foreland basins are influenced by the conductive properties and heat-producing units of the adjacent orogen; and (4)the Sea of Marmara, along the westernmost sector of the North Anatolian Fault Zone, that suggest strike-slip basins may be thermally segmented.

  • 15.
    Scheck-Wenderoth, Magdalena
    et al.
    Helmholtz Centre Potsdam GFZ German Research Centre for Geosciences, Section 4.5 – Basin Modelling, Potsdam, Germany; RWTH Aachen, Faculty of Georesources and Material Engineering, Aachen, Germany.
    Cacace, Mauro
    Helmholtz Centre Potsdam GFZ German Research Centre for Geosciences, Section 4.5 – Basin Modelling, Potsdam, Germany .
    Heidbach, Oliver
    Helmholtz Centre Potsdam GFZ German Research Centre for Geosciences, Section 4.5 – Basin Modelling, Potsdam, Germany .
    Bohnhoff, Marco
    Helmholtz Centre Potsdam GFZ German Research Centre for Geosciences, Section 4.5 – Basin Modelling, Potsdam, Germany .
    Nurlu, Murat
    Disaster and Emergency Management Authority – AFAD, Ankara, Republic of Turkey.
    Fernandez, Naiara
    Helmholtz Centre Potsdam GFZ German Research Centre for Geosciences, Section 4.5 – Basin Modelling, Potsdam, Germany .
    Bott, Judith
    Helmholtz Centre Potsdam GFZ German Research Centre for Geosciences, Section 4.5 – Basin Modelling, Potsdam, Germany .
    Gholamrezaie, Ershad
    Umeå universitet, Samhällsvetenskapliga fakulteten, Institutionen för informatik. Helmholtz Centre Potsdam GFZ, Department 4 Geosystems, Section 4.5 Basin Modeling, Potsdam, Germany.
    Deformation mechanisms along the Main Marmara Fault around the ICDP-site GONAF2022Ingår i: EGU General Assembly 2022: Session programme, 2022, artikel-id EGU22-3538Konferensbidrag (Refereegranskat)
    Abstract [en]

    The Main Marmara Fault (MMF) in NW Turkey south of Istanbul is a segment of the North Anatolian Fault Zone (NAFZ) that constitutes a right-lateral continental transform fault.  Several well-documented strong (M7+) earthquakes indicate that the MMF poses a great risk to the Istanbul metropolitan region. A 150 km long stretch of the MMF has not ruptured since 1766 and the recurrence time of 250 yrs for M7+ events derived from historical records indicate that the fault is overdue. We introduce a new project addressing how the rheological configuration of the lithosphere in concert with active fluid dynamics within the crust and mantle influence the present-day deformation along the MMF in the Marmara Sea region. We test the following hypotheses: (1) the seismic gap is related to the mechanical segmentation along the MMF which originates from the rheological configuration of the crust and lithosphere; (2) variations in deformation mechanisms with depth in response to variations in temperature and (fluid) pressure exert a first-order control on the mode of seismic activity along the MMF, and, (3) stress and strain concentrations due to strength and structural variability along the MMF can be used as an indicator for potential nucleation areas of expected earthquakes. To assess what mechanisms control the deformation along the MMF, we use data from the ICDP GONAF observatory (International Continental Drilling Programme – Geophysical Observatory at the North Anatolian Fault) and a combined work flow of data integration and process modelling to derive a quantitative description of the physical state of the MMF and its surrounding crust and upper mantle. Seismic and strain observations from the ICDP-GONAF site are integrated with regional observations on active seismicity, on the present-day deformation field at the surface, on the deep structure (crust and upper mantle) and on the present-day stress and thermal fields. This will be complemented by numerical forward simulations of coupled thermo-hydraulic-mechanical processes based on the observation-derived 3D models to evaluate the key controlling factors for the present-day mechanical configuration of the MMF and to contribute to a physics-based seismic hazard assessment.

1 - 15 av 15
RefereraExporteraLänk till träfflistan
Permanent länk
Referera
Referensformat
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Annat format
Fler format
Språk
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Annat språk
Fler språk
Utmatningsformat
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf