Umeå universitets logga

umu.sePublikationer
Ändra sökning
Avgränsa sökresultatet
1 - 4 av 4
RefereraExporteraLänk till träfflistan
Permanent länk
Referera
Referensformat
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Annat format
Fler format
Språk
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Annat språk
Fler språk
Utmatningsformat
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Träffar per sida
  • 5
  • 10
  • 20
  • 50
  • 100
  • 250
Sortering
  • Standard (Relevans)
  • Författare A-Ö
  • Författare Ö-A
  • Titel A-Ö
  • Titel Ö-A
  • Publikationstyp A-Ö
  • Publikationstyp Ö-A
  • Äldst först
  • Nyast först
  • Skapad (Äldst först)
  • Skapad (Nyast först)
  • Senast uppdaterad (Äldst först)
  • Senast uppdaterad (Nyast först)
  • Disputationsdatum (tidigaste först)
  • Disputationsdatum (senaste först)
  • Standard (Relevans)
  • Författare A-Ö
  • Författare Ö-A
  • Titel A-Ö
  • Titel Ö-A
  • Publikationstyp A-Ö
  • Publikationstyp Ö-A
  • Äldst först
  • Nyast först
  • Skapad (Äldst först)
  • Skapad (Nyast först)
  • Senast uppdaterad (Äldst först)
  • Senast uppdaterad (Nyast först)
  • Disputationsdatum (tidigaste först)
  • Disputationsdatum (senaste först)
Markera
Maxantalet träffar du kan exportera från sökgränssnittet är 250. Vid större uttag använd dig av utsökningar.
  • 1.
    Hedberg, Jakob
    et al.
    Department of Surgical Sciences, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.
    Sundbom, Magnus
    Department of Surgical Sciences, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.
    Edholm, David
    Department of Surgery in Linköping and Department of Biomedical and Clinical Sciences, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden.
    Aahlin, Eirik Kjus
    Department of GI and HPB Surgery, Institute of Clinical Medicine, University of Tromsø, Tromsø, Norway; Department of GI and HPB Surgery, University Hospital of Northern Norway, Tromsø, Norway.
    Szabo, Eva
    Department of Surgery, Örebro University, Örebro, Sweden.
    Lindberg, Fredrik
    Umeå universitet, Medicinska fakulteten, Institutionen för kirurgisk och perioperativ vetenskap, Kirurgi.
    Johnsen, Gjermund
    Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, Norway.
    Tidemann Førland, Dag
    Department of Pediatric and Gastrointestinal Surgery, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.
    Johansson, Jan
    Department of Surgery, Skane University Hospital, Lund, Sweden.
    Kauppila, Joonas H
    Department of Surgery, University of Oulu and Oulu University Hospital, Oulu, Finland.
    Svendsen, Lars Bo
    Department of Surgery and Transplantation, Copenhagen University Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark.
    Nilsson, Magnus
    Department of Clinical Science, Intervention and Technology, Division of Surgery, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden; Nuffield Department of Surgical Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.
    Lindblad, Mats
    Department of Clinical Science, Intervention and Technology, Division of Surgery, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
    Lagergren, Pernilla
    Department of Molecular Medicine and Surgery, Karolinska Institutet, Stockhom, Sweden; Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom.
    Larsen, Michael Hareskov
    Department of Surgery, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark.
    Åkesson, Oscar
    Department of Surgery, Skane University Hospital, Lund, Sweden.
    Löfdahl, Per
    Department of Surgery, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Gothenburg, Sweden.
    Mala, Tom
    Department of Pediatric and Gastrointestinal Surgery, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.
    Achiam, Michael Patrick
    Department of Surgery and Transplantation, Copenhagen University Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark; Department of Clinical Medicine, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
    Randomized controlled trial of nasogastric tube use after esophagectomy: study protocol for the kinetic trial2024Ingår i: Diseases of the esophagus, ISSN 1120-8694, E-ISSN 1442-2050, Vol. 37, nr 6, artikel-id doae010Artikel i tidskrift (Refereegranskat)
    Abstract [en]

    Esophagectomy is a complex and complication laden procedure. Despite centralization, variations in perioparative strategies reflect a paucity of evidence regarding optimal routines. The use of nasogastric (NG) tubes post esophagectomy is typically associated with significant discomfort for the patients. We hypothesize that immediate postoperative removal of the NG tube is non-inferior to current routines. All Nordic Upper Gastrointestinal Cancer centers were invited to participate in this open-label pragmatic randomized controlled trial (RCT). Inclusion criteria include resection for locally advanced esophageal cancer with gastric tube reconstruction. A pretrial survey was undertaken and was the foundation for a consensus process resulting in the Kinetic trial, an RCT allocating patients to either no use of a NG tube (intervention) or 5 days of postoperative NG tube use (control) with anastomotic leakage as primary endpoint. Secondary endpoints include pulmonary complications, overall complications, length of stay, health related quality of life. A sample size of 450 patients is planned (Kinetic trial: https://www.isrctn.com/ISRCTN39935085). Thirteen Nordic centers with a combined catchment area of 17 million inhabitants have entered the trial and ethical approval was granted in Sweden, Norway, Finland, and Denmark. All centers routinely use NG tube and all but one center use total or hybrid minimally invasive-surgical approach. Inclusion began in January 2022 and the first annual safety board assessment has deemed the trial safe and recommended continuation. We have launched the first adequately powered multi-center pragmatic controlled randomized clinical trial regarding NG tube use after esophagectomy with gastric conduit reconstruction.

    Ladda ner fulltext (pdf)
    fulltext
  • 2.
    Jestin Hannan, Christine
    et al.
    Department of Surgical Sciences, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden; Department of Surgery, Visby lasarett, Visby, Sweden.
    Risso, Solange León
    Department of Surgical Sciences, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.
    Lindblad, Mats
    Division of Surgery, Department of Clinical Sciences, Intervention and Technology (CLINTEC), Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
    Loizou, Louiza
    Division of Radiology, Department of Clinical Sciences, Intervention and Technology (CLINTEC), Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
    Szabo, Eva
    Department of Clinical Sciences, Örebro University, Örebro, Sweden.
    Edholm, David
    Department of Clinical Sciences, Örebro University, Örebro, Sweden.
    Bartholomä, Wolf Claus
    Department of Biomedical and Clinical Sciences, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden.
    Åkesson, Oscar
    Department of Surgical Sciences, Lund University, Lund, Sweden.
    Lindberg, Fredrik
    Umeå universitet, Medicinska fakulteten, Institutionen för kirurgisk och perioperativ vetenskap, Kirurgi.
    Strandberg, Sara
    Umeå universitet, Medicinska fakulteten, Institutionen för strålningsvetenskaper, Diagnostisk radiologi. Umeå universitet, Medicinska fakulteten, Institutionen för diagnostik och intervention.
    Linder, Gustav
    Department of Surgical Sciences, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.
    Hedberg, Jakob
    Department of Surgical Sciences, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.
    Inter-rater variability in multidisciplinary team meetings of oesophageal and gastro-oesophageal junction cancer on staging, resectability and treatment recommendation: national retrospective multicentre study2024Ingår i: BJS Open, E-ISSN 2474-9842, Vol. 8, nr 6, artikel-id zrae140Artikel i tidskrift (Refereegranskat)
    Abstract [en]

    BACKGROUND: There are differences in oesophageal cancer care across Sweden. According to national guidelines, all patients should be offered equal care, planned and administrated by regional multidisciplinary team meetings. The aim of the study was to investigate differences between regional multidisciplinary team meetings in Sweden regarding clinical staging and treatment recommendations for oesophageal cancer patients.

    METHODS: All six Swedish regional multidisciplinary teams were each invited to retrospectively include ten consecutive oesophageal cancer cases. After anonymization, radiological investigations were presented, along with the original case-specific medical history, anew at the participating regional multidisciplinary team meetings. Estimation of clinical tumour node metastasis (TNM) classification and treatment recommendation (curative, palliative or best supportive care) were compared between multidisciplinary team meetings as well as with original assessments.

    RESULTS: Five multidisciplinary teams participated and contributed a total of 50 cases presented to each multidisciplinary team. In estimations of cT-stage, the multidisciplinary teams were in total agreement in only eight of 50 cases (16%). For cN-stage, total agreement was seen in 17 of 50 cases (34%) and for cM-stage there was agreement in 34 cases (68%). For cT-stage, the overall summarized κ value was 0.57. For N-stage and M-stage the κ values were 0.66 and 0.78 respectively. Differences in appraisal were not associated with usage of positron emission tomography-computed tomography. In 15 of 50 cases (30%) the multidisciplinary teams disagreed on curative or palliative treatment.

    CONCLUSION: The study shows differences in assessment of clinical TNM classification and treatment recommendations made at regional multidisciplinary team meetings. Increased interrater agreement on clinical TNM classification and management plans are essential to achieve more equal care for oesophageal cancer patients in Sweden.

    Ladda ner fulltext (pdf)
    fulltext
  • 3.
    Jestin Hannan, Christine
    et al.
    Department of surgical sciences, Uppsala University, Sweden; Department of surgery, Visby lasarett, Sweden.
    Risso, Solange León
    Department of surgical sciences, Uppsala University, Sweden.
    Lindblad, Mats
    Department of surgical sciences, intervention and technology (CLINTEC), Karolinska Institutet, Sweden.
    Szabo, Eva
    Department of clinical sciences, Örebro University, Sweden.
    Edholm, David
    Department of biomedical and clinical sciences, Linköping University, Sweden.
    Bartholomä, Wolf Claus
    Department of biomedical and clinical sciences, Linköping University, Sweden.
    Åkesson, Oscar
    Department of surgical sciences, Lund University, Sweden.
    Lindberg, Fredrik
    Umeå universitet, Medicinska fakulteten, Institutionen för kirurgisk och perioperativ vetenskap.
    Strandberg, Sara
    Umeå universitet, Medicinska fakulteten, Institutionen för strålningsvetenskaper, Diagnostisk radiologi.
    Linder, Gustav
    Department of surgical sciences, Uppsala University, Sweden.
    Hedberg, Jakob
    Department of surgical sciences, Uppsala University, Sweden.
    Differences in multidisciplinary team assessment on esophageal cancer patients in Sweden: a multicentre study2022Ingår i: Diseases of the esophagus, ISSN 1120-8694, E-ISSN 1442-2050, Vol. 35, nr Suppl. 2, artikel-id 436Artikel i tidskrift (Refereegranskat)
    Abstract [en]

    There are differences in esophageal cancer care across different counties in Sweden. According to national guidelines, all patients should be offered equal care which should be administrated by regional multidisciplinary cancer conferences (MCCs). The aim of the study was to investigate differences between the six regional MCCs in Sweden regarding clinical stageing and recommended treatment.

    Ten consecutive cases per participating center, 60 cases in total, were planned for inclusion. After anonymization the radiological investigations were presented, along with the original case-specific medical history, anew at the six regional MCCs. Estimation of clinical TNM and treatment allocation (curative, palliative or best supportive care) were compared between MCCs as well as with the original assessment. Interim analysis was performed in April 2022 when ten cases had been presented at five of the six regional MCCs.

    All available cases were assessed at five MCCs in addition to the previous original assessment (60 assessments). The mean age for the first ten cases was 74.8 years (SD ± 9.8 years). Eight out of ten cases were men. In estimations of T- and N-stage the MCCs agreed in only one out of ten cases. In half of the cases more than three different estimations of N-stage were made. For clinical M-stage there was exact agreement in three cases. In determination of recommended treatment, all five MCCs were in agreement on half of the cases.

    Preliminary data show striking differences, both in assessment of TNM as well as treatment recommendation at different MCCs. One patient, recommended curative treatment by one MCC could be allocated to palliative care by another. Inclusion is ongoing and further analysis of these differences are warranted to achieve more equal care for esophageal cancer patients in Sweden.

  • 4. Kjellman, Magnus
    et al.
    Knigge, Ulrich
    Welin, Staffan
    Thiis-Evensen, Espen
    Gronbæk, Henning
    Schalin-Jäntti, Camilla
    Sorbye, Halfdan
    Joergensen, Maiken Thyregod
    Johanson, Viktor
    Metso, Saara
    Waldum, Helge
    Søreide, Jon Arne
    Ebeling, Tapani
    Lindberg, Fredrik
    Umeå universitet, Medicinska fakulteten, Institutionen för kirurgisk och perioperativ vetenskap, Kirurgi. Department of Surgery, Norrland University Hospital, Umeå, Sweden.
    Landerholm, Kalle
    Wallin, Goran
    Salem, Farhad
    Schneider, Maria del Pilar
    Belusa, Roger
    A Plasma Protein Biomarker Strategy for Detection of Small Intestinal Neuroendocrine Tumors2021Ingår i: Neuroendocrinology, ISSN 0028-3835, E-ISSN 1423-0194, Vol. 111, s. 840-849Artikel i tidskrift (Refereegranskat)
    Abstract [en]

    Background: Small intestinal neuroendocrine tumors (SI-NETs) are difficult to diagnose in the early stage of disease. Current blood biomarkers such as chromogranin A (CgA) and 5-hydroxyindolacetic acid have low sensitivity (SEN) and specificity (SPE). This is a first preplanned interim analysis (Nordic non-interventional, prospective, exploratory, EXPLAIN study [NCT02630654]). Its objective is to investigate if a plasma protein multi-biomarker strategy can improve diagnostic accuracy (ACC) in SI-NETs.

    Methods: At the time of diagnosis, before any disease-specific treatment was initiated, blood was collected from patients with advanced SI-NETs and 92 putative cancer-related plasma proteins from 135 patients were analyzed and compared with the results of age- and sex-matched controls (n = 143), using multiplex proximity extension assay and machine learning techniques.

    Results: Using a random forest model including 12 top ranked plasma proteins in patients with SI-NETs, the multi-biomarker strategy showed SEN and SPE of 89 and 91%, respectively, with negative predictive value (NPV) and positive predictive value (PPV) of 90 and 91%, respectively, to identify patients with regional or metastatic disease with an area under the receiver operator characteristic curve (AUROC) of 99%. In 30 patients with normal CgA concentrations, the model provided a diagnostic SPE of 98%, SEN of 56%, and NPV 90%, PPV of 90%, and AUROC 97%, regardless of proton pump inhibitor intake.

    Conclusion: This interim analysis demonstrates that a multi-biomarker/machine learning strategy improves diagnostic ACC of patients with SI-NET at the time of diagnosis, especially in patients with normal CgA levels. The results indicate that this multi-biomarker strategy can be useful for early detection of SI-NETs at presentation and conceivably detect recurrence after radical primary resection.

    Ladda ner fulltext (pdf)
    fulltext
1 - 4 av 4
RefereraExporteraLänk till träfflistan
Permanent länk
Referera
Referensformat
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Annat format
Fler format
Språk
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Annat språk
Fler språk
Utmatningsformat
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf